I thought that they weren't in the normal distribution, only the full one. Robby
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <sa...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Robby Findler > <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote: >> On Monday, April 25, 2011, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <sa...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: >>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Robby Findler >>> <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote: >>>> I just pushed tests for all non-racket and non-scheme collections that >>>> makes sure that all of the top-level libraries have their exports >>>> fully documented. I left out info.rkt and tried to drop obviously bad >>>> things from this list, but if you spot problems when drdr complains at >>>> you, please just go edit the file to remove libraries that shouldn't >>>> be there. >>> >>> Thanks, this is useful. >>> >>> Is there a benefit to have this spread over all the collections, >>> instead of in a directory under "collects/tests"? >> >> I put them where they are to catch the default responsibilities in >> drdr. But I have no other reason. > > Ah, makes sense. However, this has the drawback that they're in the > distribution. Does that need to be fixed? > -- > sam th > sa...@ccs.neu.edu > _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
