On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Robby Findler <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote: > I thought that they weren't in the normal distribution, only the full one.
Sorry, my sentence wasn't clear. The tests/ collection isn't in the normal distribution, but your new tests are. > > Robby > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <sa...@ccs.neu.edu> > wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Robby Findler >> <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote: >>> On Monday, April 25, 2011, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <sa...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: >>>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Robby Findler >>>> <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote: >>>>> I just pushed tests for all non-racket and non-scheme collections that >>>>> makes sure that all of the top-level libraries have their exports >>>>> fully documented. I left out info.rkt and tried to drop obviously bad >>>>> things from this list, but if you spot problems when drdr complains at >>>>> you, please just go edit the file to remove libraries that shouldn't >>>>> be there. >>>> >>>> Thanks, this is useful. >>>> >>>> Is there a benefit to have this spread over all the collections, >>>> instead of in a directory under "collects/tests"? >>> >>> I put them where they are to catch the default responsibilities in >>> drdr. But I have no other reason. >> >> Ah, makes sense. However, this has the drawback that they're in the >> distribution. Does that need to be fixed? >> -- >> sam th >> sa...@ccs.neu.edu >> > -- sam th sa...@ccs.neu.edu _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
