The dist-spec works on a per directory basis typically (although it supports what you'd want... we generally don't use that for test), so those files are in the distribution because their parent is in the normal distro.
Jay 2011/4/25 Robby Findler <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu>: > I thought that they weren't in the normal distribution, only the full one. > > Robby > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <sa...@ccs.neu.edu> > wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Robby Findler >> <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote: >>> On Monday, April 25, 2011, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <sa...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: >>>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Robby Findler >>>> <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote: >>>>> I just pushed tests for all non-racket and non-scheme collections that >>>>> makes sure that all of the top-level libraries have their exports >>>>> fully documented. I left out info.rkt and tried to drop obviously bad >>>>> things from this list, but if you spot problems when drdr complains at >>>>> you, please just go edit the file to remove libraries that shouldn't >>>>> be there. >>>> >>>> Thanks, this is useful. >>>> >>>> Is there a benefit to have this spread over all the collections, >>>> instead of in a directory under "collects/tests"? >>> >>> I put them where they are to catch the default responsibilities in >>> drdr. But I have no other reason. >> >> Ah, makes sense. However, this has the drawback that they're in the >> distribution. Does that need to be fixed? >> -- >> sam th >> sa...@ccs.neu.edu >> > > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev -- Jay McCarthy <j...@cs.byu.edu> Assistant Professor / Brigham Young University http://faculty.cs.byu.edu/~jay "The glory of God is Intelligence" - D&C 93 _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
