I think the right way to do this is to use defidthing with a minimal description and a pointer over to the racket for.
Unless it is literally the same binding (re-exported), in which case you can make scribble do that. (Macros can tell the difference, after all.) Robby On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <sa...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: > Is it possible to tell Scribble to use the documentation for one > binding for another binding? For example, Typed Racket has a binding > for `for' which is semantically the same as `for' from `racket/base', > but wraps a trivial type annotation around it. Rather than having an > entry in the TR docs for this, I'd like the documentation to just go > to the docs for the regular `for'. Is this doable? > -- > sam th > sa...@ccs.neu.edu > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev > _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
