On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Robby Findler <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote: > I think the right way to do this is to use defidthing with a minimal > description and a pointer over to the racket for.
That's certainly possible, but I don't think it's the right user experience for someone programming in Typed Racket. If they click Check Syntax, I'd like the documentation option to go directly to what they want, rather than through an indirection. > Unless it is literally the same binding (re-exported), in which case > you can make scribble do that. > > (Macros can tell the difference, after all.) Macros can tell a lot of differences that we don't reflect in the documentation (such as being the same binding, re-exported). -- sam th sa...@ccs.neu.edu _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
