At Fri, 6 May 2011 10:13:33 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > Is it possible to tell Scribble to use the documentation for one > binding for another binding? For example, Typed Racket has a binding > for `for' which is semantically the same as `for' from `racket/base', > but wraps a trivial type annotation around it.
I don't yet buy this "it's the same, except different" suggestion. If the `for' from `racket/base' doesn't work with Typed Racket, then shouldn't the docs admit that the `for's are different? _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
