I am with Sam on this one. On May 6, 2011, at 11:06 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Robby Findler > <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote: >> I think the right way to do this is to use defidthing with a minimal >> description and a pointer over to the racket for. > > That's certainly possible, but I don't think it's the right user > experience for someone programming in Typed Racket. If they click > Check Syntax, I'd like the documentation option to go directly to what > they want, rather than through an indirection. > >> Unless it is literally the same binding (re-exported), in which case >> you can make scribble do that. >> >> (Macros can tell the difference, after all.) > > Macros can tell a lot of differences that we don't reflect in the > documentation (such as being the same binding, re-exported). > -- > sam th > sa...@ccs.neu.edu > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
