Just have successfully generated and uploaded all the artifacts for
Apache Ratis 0.1.0-alpha rc0.  Will call a vote in a separated thread.

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/0.1.0-alpha/rc0/

Thanks.
Nicholas

On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 5:23 PM, Tsz Wo Sze <szets...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After a short list of sub-tasks under RATIS-53, we are very close to
> have our first 0.1.0-alpha release.  We may be able to call a vote in
> a week or so.
>
> Again, please let me know if you like to include any particular items
> to the release.
>
> Thanks for the support!
> Nicholas
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 8:39 PM, Tsz Wo Sze <szets...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thanks a lot for the supporting,  Let's roll our first release.  I
>> will start preparing it.  I guess we don't have any particular
>> features need to be included in it (please let me know if I am wrong).
>> However, we still have to make sure the license are fine and the
>> release artifact can be built.  Will file a JIRA.
>>
>> Nicholas
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 3:27 AM, Jing Zhao <ji...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Jitendra Pandey <jiten...@hortonworks.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> 0.1.0-alpha will be better. Three digit versions are better to distinguish
>>>> major, minor and maintenance releases.
>>>>
>>>> On 3/23/17, 2:08 PM, "Tsz Wo Sze" <szets...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >How about the versioning?  Should we start with 0.1-alpha or
>>>> >0.1.0-alpha?  The latter seems better.
>>>> >
>>>> >Tsz-Wo
>>>> >
>>>> >On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 9:42 PM, Jitendra Pandey <jnpan...@gmail.com>
>>>> >wrote:
>>>> >> +1
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Enis Söztutar <enis....@gmail.com>
>>>> >>wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >>> Sounds good. But we have to get the licenses and the rest of release
>>>> >>> process in line (tarballs, etc). Should be doable.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Enis
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Anu Engineer
>>>> >>><aengin...@hortonworks.com>
>>>> >>> wrote:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> > +1, good idea. Early use in SCM will give some real world usage via
>>>> >>> CBlock
>>>> >>> > and Ozone.
>>>> >>> > --Anu
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> > On 3/22/17, 4:10 PM, "Tsz Wo Sze" <szets...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> > >Hi,
>>>> >>> > >
>>>> >>> > >I propose to release 0.1-alpha so that the downstream projects can
>>>> >>> > >start integrating ratis.  One example is HDFS-11519.
>>>> >>> > >
>>>> >>> > >The release is in alpha quality with no guarantee on stability.  We
>>>> >>> > >should add such warning in the README.  What do you think?
>>>> >>> > >
>>>> >>> > >Tsz-Wo
>>>> >>> > >
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>

Reply via email to