+1 for format 0.1.0-alpha On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 8:39 PM, Tsz Wo Sze <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks a lot for the supporting, Let's roll our first release. I > will start preparing it. I guess we don't have any particular > features need to be included in it (please let me know if I am wrong). > However, we still have to make sure the license are fine and the > release artifact can be built. Will file a JIRA. > > Nicholas > > On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 3:27 AM, Jing Zhao <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 > > > > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Jitendra Pandey < > [email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> 0.1.0-alpha will be better. Three digit versions are better to > distinguish > >> major, minor and maintenance releases. > >> > >> On 3/23/17, 2:08 PM, "Tsz Wo Sze" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> >How about the versioning? Should we start with 0.1-alpha or > >> >0.1.0-alpha? The latter seems better. > >> > > >> >Tsz-Wo > >> > > >> >On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 9:42 PM, Jitendra Pandey <[email protected]> > >> >wrote: > >> >> +1 > >> >> > >> >> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Enis Söztutar <[email protected]> > >> >>wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> Sounds good. But we have to get the licenses and the rest of release > >> >>> process in line (tarballs, etc). Should be doable. > >> >>> > >> >>> Enis > >> >>> > >> >>> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Anu Engineer > >> >>><[email protected]> > >> >>> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> > +1, good idea. Early use in SCM will give some real world usage > via > >> >>> CBlock > >> >>> > and Ozone. > >> >>> > --Anu > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > On 3/22/17, 4:10 PM, "Tsz Wo Sze" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >>> > > >> >>> > >Hi, > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > >I propose to release 0.1-alpha so that the downstream projects > can > >> >>> > >start integrating ratis. One example is HDFS-11519. > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > >The release is in alpha quality with no guarantee on stability. > We > >> >>> > >should add such warning in the README. What do you think? > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > >Tsz-Wo > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> > >> >
