Hi,

After a short list of sub-tasks under RATIS-53, we are very close to
have our first 0.1.0-alpha release.  We may be able to call a vote in
a week or so.

Again, please let me know if you like to include any particular items
to the release.

Thanks for the support!
Nicholas


On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 8:39 PM, Tsz Wo Sze <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks a lot for the supporting,  Let's roll our first release.  I
> will start preparing it.  I guess we don't have any particular
> features need to be included in it (please let me know if I am wrong).
> However, we still have to make sure the license are fine and the
> release artifact can be built.  Will file a JIRA.
>
> Nicholas
>
> On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 3:27 AM, Jing Zhao <[email protected]> wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Jitendra Pandey <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> 0.1.0-alpha will be better. Three digit versions are better to distinguish
>>> major, minor and maintenance releases.
>>>
>>> On 3/23/17, 2:08 PM, "Tsz Wo Sze" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> >How about the versioning?  Should we start with 0.1-alpha or
>>> >0.1.0-alpha?  The latter seems better.
>>> >
>>> >Tsz-Wo
>>> >
>>> >On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 9:42 PM, Jitendra Pandey <[email protected]>
>>> >wrote:
>>> >> +1
>>> >>
>>> >> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Enis Söztutar <[email protected]>
>>> >>wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> Sounds good. But we have to get the licenses and the rest of release
>>> >>> process in line (tarballs, etc). Should be doable.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Enis
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Anu Engineer
>>> >>><[email protected]>
>>> >>> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> > +1, good idea. Early use in SCM will give some real world usage via
>>> >>> CBlock
>>> >>> > and Ozone.
>>> >>> > --Anu
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > On 3/22/17, 4:10 PM, "Tsz Wo Sze" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > >Hi,
>>> >>> > >
>>> >>> > >I propose to release 0.1-alpha so that the downstream projects can
>>> >>> > >start integrating ratis.  One example is HDFS-11519.
>>> >>> > >
>>> >>> > >The release is in alpha quality with no guarantee on stability.  We
>>> >>> > >should add such warning in the README.  What do you think?
>>> >>> > >
>>> >>> > >Tsz-Wo
>>> >>> > >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>>
>>> >
>>>
>>>

Reply via email to