On 30 May 2012, at 15:35, Sean Cooper wrote: > On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Jasha Joachimsthal <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 30 May 2012 16:10, Sean Cooper <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Is anyone currently working on team pages, or working on defining a >>> structure for it? >>> >>> I'd like to take a crack at defining it this week, but I don't want to >>> interrupt anyone that might already be working on the problem. >>> >>> -Sean >>> >> >> I am planning to work on it, but it's not clear yet when. So if you want to >> start, go ahead :) What I need is a concept of a page that is shared with a >> group of users, but the users cannot edit the page, only the administrator >> of the page. See also [1] > > I was looking through the code and saw what appears to be some > additions into the main page controller for share pages... but that > doesn't fully cover my use case. - same as yours but shared with > everyone, not just a group of users. > > I think we should have a separate controller for these pages to keep > the page controller as simple as possible. In my use cases I'm going > to have a few hundred pages that everyone can read but only the > administrator(s) will have access to update. > > I think we can recycle the methodology for sharing a page with a group > of people that is used in the shared page model, but I'm going to have > to add a flag for world-read-only instead of supplying a group for > read access. If we build in the support for world-read-only then this > would also cover the idea of public pages.
Could "everyone" be a kind of magic group? > > >> >> [1] http://markmail.org/thread/5dfecb5gk7qynqdc >> >> Jasha
