On 30 May 2012 19:11, Paul Sharples <[email protected]> wrote: > On 30/05/2012 16:52, Jasha Joachimsthal wrote: > >> On 30 May 2012 17:44, Paul >> Sharples<[email protected].**uk<[email protected]>> >> wrote: >> >> On 30/05/2012 16:08, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote: >>> >>> Content preview:> >>>> >>>> Content analysis details: (-10.0 points, 5.0 required) >>>> >>>> pts rule name description >>>> ---- ---------------------- ------------------------------**** >>>> >>>> -------------------- >>>> -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at >>>> http://www.dnswl.org/, >>>> high >>>> trust >>>> [140.211.11.3 listed in list.dnswl.org] >>>> -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover >>>> relay >>>> >>>> domain >>>> -3.0 RCVD_IN_RP_CERTIFIED RBL: Sender is in Return Path Certified >>>> (trusted >>>> relay) >>>> [Return Path SenderScore Certified >>>> (formerly] >>>> [Bonded Sender) -<http://www.** >>>> senderscorecertified.com<http:**//www.senderscorecertified.com<http://www.senderscorecertified.com> >>>> **>>] >>>> >>>> -2.0 RCVD_IN_RP_SAFE RBL: Sender is in Return Path Safe (trusted >>>> relay) >>>> [Return Path SenderScore Safe List >>>> (formerly] >>>> [Habeas Safelist) -<http://www.** >>>> senderscorecertified.com<http:**//www.senderscorecertified.com<http://www.senderscorecertified.com> >>>> **>>] >>>> Return-Path: dev-return-5463-P.Sharples=**bol** >>>> [email protected]**<[email protected]> >>>> >>>> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 May 2012 15:09:06.0689 (UTC) >>>> FILETIME=[284E3710:01CD3E76] >>>> >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> >>>>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jasha >>>>> Joachimsthal >>>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 10:26 AM >>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>> Subject: Re: Team Pages >>>>> >>>>> On 30 May 2012 16:10, Sean Cooper<[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Is anyone currently working on team pages, or working on defining a >>>>> >>>>>> structure for it? >>>>>> >>>>>> I'd like to take a crack at defining it this week, but I don't want to >>>>>> interrupt anyone that might already be working on the problem. >>>>>> >>>>>> -Sean >>>>>> >>>>>> I am planning to work on it, but it's not clear yet when. So if you >>>>>> >>>>> want to >>>>> start, go ahead :) What I need is a concept of a page that is shared >>>>> with a >>>>> group of users, but the users cannot edit the page, only the >>>>> administrator >>>>> of the page. See also [1] >>>>> >>>>> Please add to the proposal http://wiki.apache.org/rave/** >>>> ArchitectureTopics/PageModel<h**ttp://wiki.apache.org/rave/** >>>> ArchitectureTopics/PageModel<http://wiki.apache.org/rave/ArchitectureTopics/PageModel> >>>> > >>>> >>>> I've got some changes&improvements I've made to the page sharing >>> facility >>> >>> (RAVE-103), which probably are relevant to this discussion. >>> (not team pages yet, but the ability to make shared pages non-editable, >>> for instance) >>> Is it okay to commit this or are we too near the next build (i.e. is >>> there >>> a code freeze yet?) >>> >>> There's no code freeze yet, but if you break something now, you have >> less >> than 24 hours to fix it ;) >> Luckily some of the basic features are now covered by the integration >> tests: >> http://rave.apache.org/**integration-tests.html<http://rave.apache.org/integration-tests.html> >> > > Thanks Jasha, I've just comitted the changes. I'd be grateful if some of > the other commiters could take a look. > > Paul > > Good improvements! Without permission to edit the shared page users don't get the false hope to move or add widgets. I even tried to mess with the widget store url and the referring page id, but then you still cannot add widgets :)
In the share page dialog: Shouldn't the "Edit preferences" option be disabled for users that don't have edit permission? IMO it would be even better to remove the disabled options than to show them greyed out. The label "Edit permission" is a bit confusing (what permission can this person edit?). Maybe "Permission to edit" or "Can edit page" are less confusing. It is easy to change the add/remove links into checkboxes? > >> Jasha >> >> >> Paul >>> >>> >>> [1] >>> http://markmail.org/thread/****5dfecb5gk7qynqdc<http://markmail.org/thread/**5dfecb5gk7qynqdc> >>>> <http://**markmail.org/thread/**5dfecb5gk7qynqdc<http://markmail.org/thread/5dfecb5gk7qynqdc> >>>> > >>>> >>>> Jasha >>>>> >>>>> ----- >>>> No virus found in this message. >>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >>>> Version: 2012.0.2178 / Virus Database: 2425/5029 - Release Date: >>>> 05/28/12 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >> ----- >> No virus found in this message. >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >> Version: 2012.0.2178 / Virus Database: 2425/5029 - Release Date: 05/28/12 >> > >
