I've verified those things and everything seems okay. But, I have one minor thing: I'm afraid the fix version for RAVE-818 should not be 0.19. If we publish the release notes url like we did for 0.18, then including RAVE-818 can be misleading.
Cheers, Woonsan >________________________________ > From: Matt Franklin <[email protected]> >To: [email protected] >Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 6:35 PM >Subject: [DISCUSS] Apache Rave 0.19 Release Candidate > >Discussion thread for vote on 0.19 release candidate. > >For more information on the release process, checkout - >http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html > >Some of the things to check before voting are: >- can you run the demo binaries >- can you build the contents of source-release.zip and svn tag >- do all of the staged jars/zips contain the required LICENSE and NOTICE files >- are all of the staged artifacts signed and the signature verifiable >- is the signing key in the project's KEYS file and on a public server > > >
