>________________________________ > From: Matt Franklin <[email protected]> >To: [email protected]; Woonsan Ko <[email protected]> >Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 8:17 AM >Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Rave 0.19 Release Candidate > >On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Woonsan Ko <[email protected]> wrote: >> I've verified those things and everything seems okay. >> But, I have one minor thing: I'm afraid the fix version for RAVE-818 should >> not be 0.19. >> If we publish the release notes url like we did for 0.18, then including >> RAVE-818 can be misleading. > >Any particular reason? I was thinking we would link to the mongo >documentation from the download section...
Oh, then I must have been confused. Because I noticed its subtasks were unresolved, I just thought the issue has not been resolved yet. If there's a working solution with MongoDB, then it's fair to include it. And, a document link in a comment in the JIRA issue must be helpful. Thanks! Cheers, Woonsan > >> >> Cheers, >> >> Woonsan >> >> >> >> >> >>>________________________________ >>> From: Matt Franklin <[email protected]> >>>To: [email protected] >>>Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 6:35 PM >>>Subject: [DISCUSS] Apache Rave 0.19 Release Candidate >>> >>>Discussion thread for vote on 0.19 release candidate. >>> >>>For more information on the release process, checkout - >>>http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html >>> >>>Some of the things to check before voting are: >>>- can you run the demo binaries >>>- can you build the contents of source-release.zip and svn tag >>>- do all of the staged jars/zips contain the required LICENSE and NOTICE >>>files >>>- are all of the staged artifacts signed and the signature verifiable >>>- is the signing key in the project's KEYS file and on a public server >>> >>> >>> > > >
