On Wednesday, January 9, 2013, Woonsan Ko wrote: > I've verified those things and everything seems okay. > But, I have one minor thing: I'm afraid the fix version for RAVE-818 > should not be 0.19. > If we publish the release notes url like we did for 0.18, then including > RAVE-818 can be misleading.
Are you getting the same error as Chris? > Cheers, > > Woonsan > > > > > > >________________________________ > > From: Matt Franklin <[email protected] <javascript:;>> > >To: [email protected] <javascript:;> > >Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 6:35 PM > >Subject: [DISCUSS] Apache Rave 0.19 Release Candidate > > > >Discussion thread for vote on 0.19 release candidate. > > > >For more information on the release process, checkout - > >http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html > > > >Some of the things to check before voting are: > >- can you run the demo binaries > >- can you build the contents of source-release.zip and svn tag > >- do all of the staged jars/zips contain the required LICENSE and NOTICE > files > >- are all of the staged artifacts signed and the signature verifiable > >- is the signing key in the project's KEYS file and on a public server > > > > > >
