On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Woonsan Ko <[email protected]> wrote: > I've verified those things and everything seems okay. > But, I have one minor thing: I'm afraid the fix version for RAVE-818 should > not be 0.19. > If we publish the release notes url like we did for 0.18, then including > RAVE-818 can be misleading.
Any particular reason? I was thinking we would link to the mongo documentation from the download section... > > Cheers, > > Woonsan > > > > > >>________________________________ >> From: Matt Franklin <[email protected]> >>To: [email protected] >>Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 6:35 PM >>Subject: [DISCUSS] Apache Rave 0.19 Release Candidate >> >>Discussion thread for vote on 0.19 release candidate. >> >>For more information on the release process, checkout - >>http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html >> >>Some of the things to check before voting are: >>- can you run the demo binaries >>- can you build the contents of source-release.zip and svn tag >>- do all of the staged jars/zips contain the required LICENSE and NOTICE files >>- are all of the staged artifacts signed and the signature verifiable >>- is the signing key in the project's KEYS file and on a public server >> >> >>
