Hi Justin, This vote has been cancelled and a new vote is in progress, please check it.
Regards, yukon On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Justin Mclean <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > > Staging repos is here[1], please check. > > There’s a lot of files here and it’s hard to know what exactly to review - > that may make it a little more difficult for the IPMC review. > > > BTW, do we need copy all files in [1] to dist/dev? > > No please don't do that. > > Unless any other mentors or PPMC disagree I’d suggest the following: > 1) Canceling this vote. > 2) Preferably fixing the README and incubating site branding issues. While > not required right not sometimes these think have a tendency to slip off > teh radar. If it’s decided not to fix please raise a JIRA so it’s not > forgotten about. > 3) Creating a single convince binary that contains LICENSE, NOTICE, > DISCLAIMER, README and the binary artefacts. That way it’s easy to review > by us and the IPMC. > 4) Calling a new vote. > > This is only my suggestion, you are free to ignore it, and if anyone > thinks differently just say so and I’ll go ahead and review the current > release. > > Why I’m suggesting this is that I’m not 100% certain that this release > would pass IPMC review as the binary artefacts where made after the vote > was called - it may be hard to show they match the released source code. > Again anyone have a different opinion? I still think it's likely to pass, > but if it doesn’t we have to make another release candidate and vote on it. > > I’d also suggest when starting the vote again (or for the next release) > please make a discussion thread so this vote thread doesn’t become polluted > with discussion about the release artifacts. > > Thanks, > Justin
