The Flex doc is in a branch in Subversion.  You can browse it here:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/flex/site/branches/flexdoc/content/doc/flex/us
ing/

I think you can use Subversion and clone this:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/flex/site
And find it in the branches.

Donations are really painful.  I'd rather not do one again.

-Alex

On 1/19/18, 4:31 PM, "Andrew Wetmore" <[email protected]> wrote:

>It seems to me that there will be a period of heavy lifting as we populate
>the help docs for the first time, and that then the load will diminish
>significantly. I am happy to contemplate updating the ToC by hand a couple
>of times a week indefinitely: small pain for big gain.
>
>I would love to review the Flex stuff we inherited but never published.
>Can
>you point me at it?
>
>How much effort is involved in getting them to donate the rest? Everything
>will have to be rebranded for Royale, of course; and probably a lot of it
>is of limited use. But if it's a gift horse, why not?
>
>a
>
>On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 8:24 PM, Alex Harui <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>
>> I've been wondering if it was worth trying to autogenerate the TOC or
>>not.
>>  The only advantage is that it would allow us to add a page and have it
>> appear without having to also edit the template.  I think I'll give up
>>on
>> auto-generating the TOC.
>>
>> BTW, in 2015, Adobe donated some Flex doc to Apache.  I don't remember
>> what was in it, but Apache Flex never got around to publishing it.  It
>>is
>> sitting in a branch on our site repo.  There appears to be other Adobe
>>doc
>> still on Adobe's site that was not donated that deals with the basics of
>> using MXML and AS3.  I'm not sure if we want to try to get that donated
>>to
>> Apache or not.  We can't use the content from the Adobe site directly.
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 1/19/18, 4:12 PM, "Andrew Wetmore" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >I feel like we are trying to fit ourselves to the limitations of a
>> >template, rather than setting up to do what will present the material
>>in
>> >the best way. I am almost positive that we will have collections of
>>pages
>> >that we can't even anticipate now, but for sure "Flex in a Week" is a
>> >great
>> >example. (I would love to have that one back!)
>> >
>> >What is the virtue of an auto-generated table of contents? We are not
>> >auto-generating the contents...
>> >
>> >On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 8:08 PM, Alex Harui <[email protected]>
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> I've spent the afternoon reading Jekyll doc.
>> >>
>> >> Jekyll has a concept of "Collections" that could be used to help
>> >> auto-generate a TOC, but if there is a "Welcome" collection (and a
>>"Get
>> >> Started" and "Create An Application" and other collections for each
>> >> top-level), the collection pages will be at URLs like
>> >> "apache.github.io/royale-docs/welcome/index.html.  There does not
>>seem
>> >>to
>> >> be a way to have the landing page (when you hit the URL
>> >> apache.github.io/royale-docs) be welcome/index.html.  Unless we put
>>an
>> >> redirect in index.html.
>> >>
>> >> Now we could make the Welcome not a collection and just a set of
>> >>"pages".
>> >> But I'm wondering if we are going to have any other "set" of
>> >>documentation
>> >> served from royale-docs such that the index.html should have a link
>>to
>> >>the
>> >> Welcome collection as our main user document and some other set of
>> >> pages/collections on royals-docs would be considered a different set
>> >>with
>> >> a different link from index.html.  If we generated static ASDoc
>>would we
>> >> stick it all on royale-docs?  There once was a whole series of
>>tutorials
>> >> like "Flex In A Week".  Would that be another "set"?
>> >>
>> >> Thoughts?
>> >> -Alex
>> >>
>> >> On 1/19/18, 1:00 PM, "Andrew Wetmore" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >>I assume that the Welcome page is the main index.html landing page?
>> >>Maybe
>> >> >on its content it will lead you more towards the Get Started page.
>> >> >
>> >> >Yes and yes.
>> >> >
>> >> >On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 4:40 PM, Alex Harui
>><[email protected]>
>> >> >wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> OK, we'll leave it as you have it and see what kind of feedback we
>> >>get.
>> >> >> I
>> >> >> assume that the Welcome page is the main index.html landing page?
>> >>Maybe
>> >> >>on
>> >> >> its content it will lead you more towards the Get Started page.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> -Alex
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On 1/19/18, 9:36 AM, "Andrew Wetmore" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >I am not sure I agree about putting "Getting Started" first. If
>>the
>> >> >>table
>> >> >> >of contents as I propose it appears with its top-level entries
>> >> >>collapsed,
>> >> >> >then "Get started" is the second item the reader sees. I do not
>> >>think
>> >> >>that
>> >> >> >is too big of a hurdle to jump over.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 1:19 PM, Alex Harui
>> >><[email protected]>
>> >> >> >wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> Hi Andrew,
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Thanks for doing this.  I'm wondering if we should have a
>>"Getting
>> >> >> >> Started" before "Features and Concepts".  I would like to see
>>us
>> >> >> >>emphasize
>> >> >> >> the Express components more going forward, which may reduce the
>> >> >>emphasis
>> >> >> >> on PAYG for the newbie.  PAYG is important to the framework
>> >> >>developers
>> >> >> >>in
>> >> >> >> order to provide the app developer with more ways to tune their
>> >>app,
>> >> >>but
>> >> >> >> only if they need it.  I'd like to see the doc lead you to
>> >> >>downloading
>> >> >> >> Royale and getting some app up and running in, say, 10 minutes.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> I hope to spend some time on the doc over the next few days or
>> >>more,
>> >> >>so
>> >> >> >>I
>> >> >> >> will keep this proposal in mind as we explore how to implement
>>the
>> >> >>doc.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Thanks,
>> >> >> >> -Alex
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> On 1/19/18, 7:38 AM, "Andrew Wetmore" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >Hi, all:
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >I have started to outline the sort of table of contents for
>> >>Royale
>> >> >>user
>> >> >> >> >documentation that I as a non-expert developer would want to
>> >>see. I
>> >> >> >>would
>> >> >> >> >want the ToC to lead me to information that will help me both
>> >> >>migrate
>> >> >> >> >existing Flex projects to Royale and create new projects
>>within
>> >>the
>> >> >> >>Royale
>> >> >> >> >ecosystem.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >The outline is in this Google Doc:
>> >> >> >> >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> >> >> >> https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.goog
>> >> >> >> >le.com%2Fdocument%2Fd%2F1ap0jzhqfhKITE3F_tFijndz_
>> >> >> >> gpCKXgcZHlnycNSeTGw%2Fedi
>> >> >> >> >t%3Fusp%3Dsharing&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
>> >> >> >> 7C1861f488d46a4134ce4f
>> >> >> >> >08d55f52a21a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>> >> >> >> 7C6365197308688271
>> >> >> >>
>> >>>31&sdata=3BswQuSRfgKvk7rZX83CXTRJsFhA7SEDWSlFQHkLIrM%3D&reserved=0
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >If you use that link you should have editor privileges for the
>> >> >> >>document.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >I am fairly confident about the contents of the first column.
>>I
>> >>have
>> >> >> >>not
>> >> >> >> >completed building out the second and third columns, but I
>>think
>> >>you
>> >> >> >>can
>> >> >> >> >get a sense of what you might see as you drill down into the
>>help
>> >> >>docs.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >I am really good at organizing this sort of stuff and at
>>helping
>> >> >> >>explain
>> >> >> >> >complex concepts clearly. However, I probably have the least
>> >> >>technical
>> >> >> >> >knowledge of anybody reading this thread, so my role must be
>>in
>> >> >>support
>> >> >> >> >rather than as a first-level knowledge source.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >I will continue building out the second and third columns, but
>> >>feel
>> >> >> >>free
>> >> >> >> >to
>> >> >> >> >pitch in. If you want to suggest things rather than make an
>>edit,
>> >> >> >>adding
>> >> >> >> >comments to the document might be the best way. You can also
>> >>change
>> >> >> >>from
>> >> >> >> >"edit" to "suggest" mode if you want your changes to be
>> >>provisional
>> >> >>and
>> >> >> >> >highlighted.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >a
>> >> >> >> >--
>> >> >> >> >Andrew Wetmore
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> >> >> http%3A%2F%2Fcottage1
>> >> >> >>>4
>> >> >> >> .
>> >> >> >> >blogspot.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
>> >> >> >> 7C1861f488d46a4134ce4f08
>> >> >> >> >d55f52a21a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>> >> >> >> 7C636519730868827131
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>>&sdata=B%2FnPo%2FH6U8AnuJlynjU%2B3eKHfgKu%
>> >> >> 2B3fhOkmENjwjIy4%3D&reserved=0
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >--
>> >> >> >Andrew Wetmore
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> >> http%3A%2F%2Fcottage1
>> >> >>>4
>> >> >> .
>> >> >> >blogspot.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
>> >> >> 7C9c35244ba8004d7e4ebd08
>> >> >> >d55f633d43%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>> >> >> 7C636519802209896361
>> >> >> >&sdata=ssBcUu2uT%2B9HEL9jV1GEy7yodbGfEliCc7B9Qf
>> 1%2BYFA%3D&reserved=0
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >--
>> >> >Andrew Wetmore
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> http%3A%2F%2Fcottage1
>> >>>4
>> >> .
>> >> >blogspot.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
>> >> 7C01f8158134ae46a8b0d408
>> >> >d55f7fc22b%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>> >> 7C636519924691296666
>> >> >&sdata=wOvxJz3fT%2BW%2FD5mu8LesyUX3P6ptS9QiXdSux1cOy6I%3D&reserved=0
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >--
>> >Andrew Wetmore
>> >
>> 
>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcottage1
>>>4
>> .
>> >blogspot.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
>> 7C4949f27ff1064462e03e08
>> >d55f9a8fb3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>> 7C636520039803724615
>> >&sdata=QN4WEAtiJmK68PfEKiyCLeFSF95PKyqSSMvKu09xThI%3D&reserved=0
>>
>>
>
>
>-- 
>Andrew Wetmore
>
>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcottage14.
>blogspot.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C0bae210e5d0e4116c8c808
>d55f9d3815%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636520051271808981
>&sdata=p9nlqU7PE2Bk7nmeAqU0MCf8v%2FHP31A4kC6kJzaKkOg%3D&reserved=0

Reply via email to