I believe approval of my committer status is in process, but not complete.
When it is complete, do I get access to Jenkins, or do I go ahead and
create a login for myself? And, once I have that, is it clear how to work
with Jenkins? Or am I off to tutorial-land?

On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 5:24 AM, Alex Harui <[email protected]>
wrote:

> OK, I will look into how to do that.
>
> I've pushed enough changes so that you can see the beginnings of a TOC for
> some of the pages.  Committers are welcome to grab the develop branch,
> make the TOC look better, create and fill in the missing pages, etc.
> Hopefully you can see the pattern of what files to create with what names
> from the .MD files that are there and the HREFs in the TOC (in
> _layouts/docpage.html).
>
> Next up for me is to get TOC to start out collapsed and have each page
> highlight its entry in the TOC.  But I'm done for tonight.
>
> The build is here:
> http://apacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/
> RoyaleDocs_Stagin
> g/
> The staged site is here:
> http://apacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/
> RoyaleDocs_Stagin
> g/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/_site/index.html
>
> Later,
> -Alex
>
> On 1/21/18, 4:18 PM, "Andrew Wetmore" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >Bring up the current Apache Royale webpage [1] on a mobile device, or if
> >on
> >a computer reduce the width of the tab to half or less of the screen
> >width.
> >You will see the three-bars icon appear with the ToC behind it.
> >
> >[1]
> >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Froyale.apa
> >che.org%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> 7C41516ef1bd6743c25b9f08d5612
> >daa88%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636521771143519890&sdat
> >a=mLRmN4vAfE2e8i2%2FVjVIQafd7Gdjdh7oYp%2BECd7UCSo%3D&reserved=0
> >
> >On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 8:15 PM, Andrew Wetmore <[email protected]>
> >wrote:
> >
> >> This is interesting progress.
> >>
> >> The normal behavior for the table of contents when a page is seen on a
> >> small screen is for the ToC to be available as a drop-down menu
> >>activated
> >> by clicking an icon that looks like three horizontal lines. The trick
> >>here
> >> will be how the sub-menus appear...I believe they MAY slide out when
> >>their
> >> parent is clicked.
> >>
> >> On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 4:07 AM, Alex Harui <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> FWIW, I believe I have successfully created a develop branch in the
> >>> royale-docs repo and setup the ApacheRoyaleCI to build the repo with
> >>> Jekyll so we can use CI for staging builds.  I didn't see a way to do
> >>> staging with GH-Pages.
> >>>
> >>> I will try to put some sort of layout with the TOC navigation in a left
> >>> pane or something over the next days.  One question:  On a phone in
> >>> portrait, what should happen to the TOC?
> >>>
> >>> My goal is to get some sort of skeleton up, especially around the
> >>>"Build
> >>> your first Royale App in minutes" area and make sure the Express set
> >>>can
> >>> deliver on its promise.
> >>>
> >>> I'm done for tonight.  Should be back online in about 18 hours.
> >>>
> >>> -Alex
> >>>
> >>> On 1/20/18, 6:27 AM, "Andrew Wetmore" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> >Some of the inherited stuff in subversion may be quite useful,
> >>>although
> >>> >not
> >>> >in the first wave of populating the help docs. I see stuff on
> >>> >internationalization, for instance, that I don't think we are touching
> >>> yet
> >>> >in Royale.
> >>> >
> >>> >Going back to questions about helping people start quickly with
> >>>Royale, I
> >>> >think there should be further prominent links on the "getting started"
> >>> tab
> >>> >of the website. People would not have to go down the documentation
> >>>stack
> >>> >to
> >>> >see these options:
> >>> >
> >>> >   - Get Apache Royale
> >>> >   - Build your first Royale app in minutes
> >>> >   - Migrate from Flex/Flash to Royale
> >>> >   - See what Royale can do
> >>> >
> >>> >Each item would link to the appropriate getting-started type material
> >>>in
> >>> >the help docs. The fourth link would lead to running versions of the
> >>> >example apps that we ship, for now, and eventually would lead to
> >>>examples
> >>> >of "real" applications built in Royale.
> >>> >
> >>> >I would even add a "Get started" link on the landing page that moves
> >>>the
> >>> >visitor to the Getting Started tab (following the "don't make me
> >>>think"
> >>> >principle).
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >a
> >>> >
> >>> >On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 3:12 AM, Alex Harui <[email protected]
> >
> >>> >wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >> The Flex doc is in a branch in Subversion.  You can browse it here:
> >>> >>
> >>> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%
> >>> 3A%2F%2Fsvn.apach
> >>> >>e.org%2Fviewvc%2Fflex%2Fsite%2Fbranches%2Fflexdoc%2F&data=
> >>> 02%7C01%7Caharu
> >>> >>i%40adobe.com%7C04b7f65cebed415f0f8b08d560120114%
> >>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2
> >>> >>c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636520552807919920&sdata=fDlh86CFmxbp
> >>> JXy8a4CQPz5Dlmi
> >>> >>vFgMvYfMGXEsx%2BMs%3D&reserved=0
> >>> >> content/doc/flex/us
> >>> >> ing/
> >>> >>
> >>> >> I think you can use Subversion and clone this:
> >>> >>
> >>> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%
> >>> 3A%2F%2Fsvn.apac
> >>> >>he.org%2Frepos%2Fasf%2Fflex%2Fsite&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com
> >>> %7C04
> >>> >>b7f65cebed415f0f8b08d560120114%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c17
> >>> 8decee1%7C0%7C0
> >>> >>%7C636520552807919920&sdata=%2FTCZADveQlYe6Zgcg%2F5i9lJ%2B
> >>> %2BceAwvTig5qLf
> >>> >>m2stXY%3D&reserved=0
> >>> >> And find it in the branches.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Donations are really painful.  I'd rather not do one again.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> -Alex
> >>> >>
> >>> >> On 1/19/18, 4:31 PM, "Andrew Wetmore" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> >It seems to me that there will be a period of heavy lifting as we
> >>> >>populate
> >>> >> >the help docs for the first time, and that then the load will
> >>>diminish
> >>> >> >significantly. I am happy to contemplate updating the ToC by hand a
> >>> >>couple
> >>> >> >of times a week indefinitely: small pain for big gain.
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >I would love to review the Flex stuff we inherited but never
> >>> published.
> >>> >> >Can
> >>> >> >you point me at it?
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >How much effort is involved in getting them to donate the rest?
> >>> >>Everything
> >>> >> >will have to be rebranded for Royale, of course; and probably a
> >>>lot of
> >>> >>it
> >>> >> >is of limited use. But if it's a gift horse, why not?
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >a
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 8:24 PM, Alex Harui
> >>><[email protected]
> >>> >
> >>> >> >wrote:
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >> I've been wondering if it was worth trying to autogenerate the
> >>>TOC
> >>> or
> >>> >> >>not.
> >>> >> >>  The only advantage is that it would allow us to add a page and
> >>>have
> >>> >>it
> >>> >> >> appear without having to also edit the template.  I think I'll
> >>>give
> >>> >>up
> >>> >> >>on
> >>> >> >> auto-generating the TOC.
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> BTW, in 2015, Adobe donated some Flex doc to Apache.  I don't
> >>> >>remember
> >>> >> >> what was in it, but Apache Flex never got around to publishing
> >>>it.
> >>> >>It
> >>> >> >>is
> >>> >> >> sitting in a branch on our site repo.  There appears to be other
> >>> >>Adobe
> >>> >> >>doc
> >>> >> >> still on Adobe's site that was not donated that deals with the
> >>> >>basics of
> >>> >> >> using MXML and AS3.  I'm not sure if we want to try to get that
> >>> >>donated
> >>> >> >>to
> >>> >> >> Apache or not.  We can't use the content from the Adobe site
> >>> >>directly.
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> -Alex
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> On 1/19/18, 4:12 PM, "Andrew Wetmore" <[email protected]>
> >>>wrote:
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >I feel like we are trying to fit ourselves to the limitations
> >>>of a
> >>> >> >> >template, rather than setting up to do what will present the
> >>> >>material
> >>> >> >>in
> >>> >> >> >the best way. I am almost positive that we will have
> >>>collections of
> >>> >> >>pages
> >>> >> >> >that we can't even anticipate now, but for sure "Flex in a
> >>>Week" is
> >>> >>a
> >>> >> >> >great
> >>> >> >> >example. (I would love to have that one back!)
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >What is the virtue of an auto-generated table of contents? We
> >>>are
> >>> >>not
> >>> >> >> >auto-generating the contents...
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 8:08 PM, Alex Harui
> >>> >><[email protected]>
> >>> >> >> >wrote:
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> I've spent the afternoon reading Jekyll doc.
> >>> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> Jekyll has a concept of "Collections" that could be used to
> >>>help
> >>> >> >> >> auto-generate a TOC, but if there is a "Welcome" collection
> >>>(and
> >>> a
> >>> >> >>"Get
> >>> >> >> >> Started" and "Create An Application" and other collections for
> >>> >>each
> >>> >> >> >> top-level), the collection pages will be at URLs like
> >>> >> >> >> "apache.github.io/royale-docs/welcome/index.html.  There does
> >>> not
> >>> >> >>seem
> >>> >> >> >>to
> >>> >> >> >> be a way to have the landing page (when you hit the URL
> >>> >> >> >> apache.github.io/royale-docs) be welcome/index.html.  Unless
> >>>we
> >>> >>put
> >>> >> >>an
> >>> >> >> >> redirect in index.html.
> >>> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> Now we could make the Welcome not a collection and just a set
> >>>of
> >>> >> >> >>"pages".
> >>> >> >> >> But I'm wondering if we are going to have any other "set" of
> >>> >> >> >>documentation
> >>> >> >> >> served from royale-docs such that the index.html should have a
> >>> >>link
> >>> >> >>to
> >>> >> >> >>the
> >>> >> >> >> Welcome collection as our main user document and some other
> >>>set
> >>> of
> >>> >> >> >> pages/collections on royals-docs would be considered a
> >>>different
> >>> >>set
> >>> >> >> >>with
> >>> >> >> >> a different link from index.html.  If we generated static
> >>>ASDoc
> >>> >> >>would we
> >>> >> >> >> stick it all on royale-docs?  There once was a whole series of
> >>> >> >>tutorials
> >>> >> >> >> like "Flex In A Week".  Would that be another "set"?
> >>> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> Thoughts?
> >>> >> >> >> -Alex
> >>> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> On 1/19/18, 1:00 PM, "Andrew Wetmore" <[email protected]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >>I assume that the Welcome page is the main index.html
> >>>landing
> >>> >>page?
> >>> >> >> >>Maybe
> >>> >> >> >> >on its content it will lead you more towards the Get Started
> >>> >>page.
> >>> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >Yes and yes.
> >>> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 4:40 PM, Alex Harui
> >>> >> >><[email protected]>
> >>> >> >> >> >wrote:
> >>> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> OK, we'll leave it as you have it and see what kind of
> >>> >>feedback we
> >>> >> >> >>get.
> >>> >> >> >> >> I
> >>> >> >> >> >> assume that the Welcome page is the main index.html landing
> >>> >>page?
> >>> >> >> >>Maybe
> >>> >> >> >> >>on
> >>> >> >> >> >> its content it will lead you more towards the Get Started
> >>> page.
> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> -Alex
> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> On 1/19/18, 9:36 AM, "Andrew Wetmore" <[email protected]
> >
> >>> >> wrote:
> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >I am not sure I agree about putting "Getting Started"
> >>>first.
> >>> >>If
> >>> >> >>the
> >>> >> >> >> >>table
> >>> >> >> >> >> >of contents as I propose it appears with its top-level
> >>> entries
> >>> >> >> >> >>collapsed,
> >>> >> >> >> >> >then "Get started" is the second item the reader sees. I
> >>>do
> >>> >>not
> >>> >> >> >>think
> >>> >> >> >> >>that
> >>> >> >> >> >> >is too big of a hurdle to jump over.
> >>> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 1:19 PM, Alex Harui
> >>> >> >> >><[email protected]>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >wrote:
> >>> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> Hi Andrew,
> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks for doing this.  I'm wondering if we should have
> >>>a
> >>> >> >>"Getting
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> Started" before "Features and Concepts".  I would like
> >>>to
> >>> >>see
> >>> >> >>us
> >>> >> >> >> >> >>emphasize
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> the Express components more going forward, which may
> >>>reduce
> >>> >>the
> >>> >> >> >> >>emphasis
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> on PAYG for the newbie.  PAYG is important to the
> >>>framework
> >>> >> >> >> >>developers
> >>> >> >> >> >> >>in
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> order to provide the app developer with more ways to
> >>>tune
> >>> >>their
> >>> >> >> >>app,
> >>> >> >> >> >>but
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> only if they need it.  I'd like to see the doc lead you
> >>>to
> >>> >> >> >> >>downloading
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> Royale and getting some app up and running in, say, 10
> >>> >>minutes.
> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> I hope to spend some time on the doc over the next few
> >>>days
> >>> >>or
> >>> >> >> >>more,
> >>> >> >> >> >>so
> >>> >> >> >> >> >>I
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> will keep this proposal in mind as we explore how to
> >>> >>implement
> >>> >> >>the
> >>> >> >> >> >>doc.
> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks,
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> -Alex
> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> On 1/19/18, 7:38 AM, "Andrew Wetmore"
> >>><[email protected]
> >>> >
> >>> >> >> wrote:
> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >Hi, all:
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >I have started to outline the sort of table of contents
> >>> for
> >>> >> >> >>Royale
> >>> >> >> >> >>user
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >documentation that I as a non-expert developer would
> >>>want
> >>> >>to
> >>> >> >> >>see. I
> >>> >> >> >> >> >>would
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >want the ToC to lead me to information that will help
> >>>me
> >>> >>both
> >>> >> >> >> >>migrate
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >existing Flex projects to Royale and create new
> >>>projects
> >>> >> >>within
> >>> >> >> >>the
> >>> >> >> >> >> >>Royale
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >ecosystem.
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >The outline is in this Google Doc:
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.goog
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >le.com%2Fdocument%2Fd%2F1ap0jzhqfhKITE3F_tFijndz_
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> gpCKXgcZHlnycNSeTGw%2Fedi
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >t%3Fusp%3Dsharing&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> 7C1861f488d46a4134ce4f
> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>>>08d55f52a21a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> 7C6365197308688271
> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >>>31&sdata=3BswQuSRfgKvk7rZX83CXTRJsFhA7SEDWSlFQHkLIrM%3D&
> >>> reserved=0
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >If you use that link you should have editor privileges
> >>>for
> >>> >>the
> >>> >> >> >> >> >>document.
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >I am fairly confident about the contents of the first
> >>> >>column.
> >>> >> >>I
> >>> >> >> >>have
> >>> >> >> >> >> >>not
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >completed building out the second and third columns,
> >>>but I
> >>> >> >>think
> >>> >> >> >>you
> >>> >> >> >> >> >>can
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >get a sense of what you might see as you drill down
> >>>into
> >>> >>the
> >>> >> >>help
> >>> >> >> >> >>docs.
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >I am really good at organizing this sort of stuff and
> >>>at
> >>> >> >>helping
> >>> >> >> >> >> >>explain
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >complex concepts clearly. However, I probably have the
> >>> >>least
> >>> >> >> >> >>technical
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >knowledge of anybody reading this thread, so my role
> >>>must
> >>> >>be
> >>> >> >>in
> >>> >> >> >> >>support
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >rather than as a first-level knowledge source.
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >I will continue building out the second and third
> >>>columns,
> >>> >>but
> >>> >> >> >>feel
> >>> >> >> >> >> >>free
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >to
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >pitch in. If you want to suggest things rather than
> >>>make
> >>> an
> >>> >> >>edit,
> >>> >> >> >> >> >>adding
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >comments to the document might be the best way. You can
> >>> >>also
> >>> >> >> >>change
> >>> >> >> >> >> >>from
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >"edit" to "suggest" mode if you want your changes to be
> >>> >> >> >>provisional
> >>> >> >> >> >>and
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >highlighted.
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >a
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >--
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >Andrew Wetmore
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >>> >> >> >> >> http%3A%2F%2Fcottage1
> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>4
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> .
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >blogspot.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> 7C1861f488d46a4134ce4f08
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >d55f52a21a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> 7C636519730868827131
> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>&sdata=B%2FnPo%2FH6U8AnuJlynjU%2B3eKHfgKu%
> >>> >> >> >> >> 2B3fhOkmENjwjIy4%3D&reserved=0
> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >--
> >>> >> >> >> >> >Andrew Wetmore
> >>> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >>> >> >> >> http%3A%2F%2Fcottage1
> >>> >> >> >> >>>4
> >>> >> >> >> >> .
> >>> >> >> >> >> >blogspot.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> >>> >> >> >> >> 7C9c35244ba8004d7e4ebd08
> >>> >> >> >> >> >d55f633d43%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> >>> >> >> >> >> 7C636519802209896361
> >>> >> >> >> >> >&sdata=ssBcUu2uT%2B9HEL9jV1GEy7yodbGfEliCc7B9Qf
> >>> >> >> 1%2BYFA%3D&reserved=0
> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >--
> >>> >> >> >> >Andrew Wetmore
> >>> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >>> >> >> http%3A%2F%2Fcottage1
> >>> >> >> >>>4
> >>> >> >> >> .
> >>> >> >> >> >blogspot.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> >>> >> >> >> 7C01f8158134ae46a8b0d408
> >>> >> >> >> >d55f7fc22b%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> >>> >> >> >> 7C636519924691296666
> >>> >> >> >> >&sdata=wOvxJz3fT%2BW%2FD5mu8LesyUX3P6ptS9QiXdSux1cO
> >>> >> y6I%3D&reserved=0
> >>> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >--
> >>> >> >> >Andrew Wetmore
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >>> >> http%3A%2F%2Fcottage1
> >>> >> >>>4
> >>> >> >> .
> >>> >> >> >blogspot.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> >>> >> >> 7C4949f27ff1064462e03e08
> >>> >> >> >d55f9a8fb3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> >>> >> >> 7C636520039803724615
> >>> >> >> >&sdata=QN4WEAtiJmK68PfEKiyCLeFSF95PKy
> qSSMvKu09xThI%3D&reserved=0
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >--
> >>> >> >Andrew Wetmore
> >>> >> >
> >>> >>
> >>> >>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%
> >>> 3A%2F%2Fcottage1
> >>> >>>4
> >>> >> .
> >>> >> >blogspot.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> >>> >> 7C0bae210e5d0e4116c8c808
> >>> >> >d55f9d3815%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> >>> >> 7C636520051271808981
> >>> >> >&sdata=p9nlqU7PE2Bk7nmeAqU0MCf8v%2FHP31A4kC6kJzaKkOg%3D&reserved=0
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >--
> >>> >Andrew Wetmore
> >>> >
> >>> >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%
> >>> 2F%2Fcottage14.
> >>> >blogspot.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C04b7f65
> >>> cebed415f0f8b08
> >>> >d560120114%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636
> >>> 520552807919920
> >>> >&sdata=aw6%2B5KPXUb55cZD4sF63JX3rjbqTs1KdQ96RekyA4Cg%3D&reserved=0
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Andrew Wetmore
> >>
> >>
> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Fcottage14
> >>.blogspot.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> 7C41516ef1bd6743c25b9f
> >>08d5612daa88%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636521771143519
> >>890&sdata=EPXCgMpPiuyGiBDAQfqsVb4yVTlFrtI5wU1TouIDVv8%3D&reserved=0
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >--
> >Andrew Wetmore
> >
> >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcottage14
> .
> >blogspot.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> 7C41516ef1bd6743c25b9f08
> >d5612daa88%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636521771143519890
> >&sdata=EPXCgMpPiuyGiBDAQfqsVb4yVTlFrtI5wU1TouIDVv8%3D&reserved=0
>
>


-- 
Andrew Wetmore

http://cottage14.blogspot.com/

Reply via email to