Hi Alex,

right, I tested it in JewelExample. If you find something that does not
conform to what you thinked please let me know to address it.
I think it should not be very difficult to handle some isolated case with
what we have

thanks



2018-03-13 18:24 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>:

> Hi Carlos,
>
> Just so I'm clear, you believe that UIBase.as in the jewel-ui-set branch
> addresses all of these issues?  I've just been watching commits, so if you
> think that's the case then I will look at the current state of your UIBase.
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> On 3/13/18, 10:14 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
> <carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of carlosrov...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> >Hi Alex,
> >
> >2018-03-13 17:50 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>:
> >
> >> Hi Carlos,
> >>
> >> I do not think you are considering all of the scenarios in your proposed
> >> code.  I'm sad that I have to delineate them again, but I will try.
> >>
> >> 1) In Basic there are two sets of strings:  The fixed set from typeNames
> >> that should "never" change.  And the className set from the user that
> >>can
> >> not only add, but also remove a set of HTML classes.
> >>
> >>
> >I see the next email so I respond to this in the following, I solved that
> >and explain later
> >
> >
> >> 2) In MDL and I guess Jewel, there is a third set.  They are tied to
> >> properties like you said.  "fab" and "primary", and things like that.
> >>
> >
> >Yes this will be the normal case in users. People using Jewel or other UI
> >set with look and feel will
> >use properties as their normal basis in the same way they do now in MDL
> >
> >
> >>
> >> 3) For PAYG reasons, it would be great if Basic did not have to
> >> contemplate the third set.
> >>
> >> 4) For PAYG reasons, it would be nice if Basic did not have to assume
> >> conversion to array and call split().  The current code in the develop
> >> branch lets the browser do the split() in native code.
> >>
> >
> >for 3 and 4 what's the best way to left UIBase untouched so I can use my
> >code in Jewel?
> >Is the actual way of duplicating the code for UIBase in my own library the
> >best way?
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Then, as a performance consideration, Harbs claims that changing
> >>classList
> >> is expensive.
> >>
> >
> >I don't will say that there's a low performance, but my guess is that is
> >nothing that we should have in consideration, but we can discuss it later.
> >
> >
> >>
> >> So, your proposed solution MUST allow the user to delete/remove any
> >> strings they added without removing strings added from typeNames or from
> >> the "fab"/"primary" properties.
> >
> >
> >That's now working
> >
> >
> >> And allow add/remove of the user's
> >> strings before or after changing properties like "fab" and "primary".
> >>
> >
> >as we are dealing with a collection this is working and only one copy of
> >the string is maintained and outputted, I think in this way
> >less errors of this kind should happen
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Show us how that will work.  I'm pretty sure it is possible.  Then we
> >>will
> >> debate the performance aspects.
> >>
> >
> >I have it right now completely working in my branch, so it's a matter to
> >try it in JewelExample
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> -Alex
> >>
> >> On 3/13/18, 6:49 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos
> >>Rovira"
> >> <carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of carlosrov...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> >So, you if is == you expect that setting className in royale you remove
> >> >all
> >> >inclusive typeNames?
> >> >Harbs, className is not equal to class in HTML
> >> >
> >> >2018-03-13 14:08 GMT+01:00 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>:
> >> >
> >> >> className in Royale == class in HTML.
> >> >>
> >> >> > On Mar 13, 2018, at 2:55 PM, Carlos Rovira
> >><carlosrov...@apache.org>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I think we're getting to the point in this discussion.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > For me as a user, I expect to use className property to "add", and
> >>not
> >> >> > override all I have
> >> >> > for that reason in MDL and now in Royale we decided to create
> >> >>properties
> >> >> > (that use to be boolean) like "primary" or in MDL "fab" to add or
> >> >>remove
> >> >> > those properties (since are library properties that are managed
> >> >> > specifically).
> >> >> > I don't want to set primary and then className removes that! I
> >>think
> >> >>that
> >> >> > function is not right and will be the cause of many problems.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > If the user wants to remove all class names, he can do with a
> >>method
> >> >>that
> >> >> > callls element.classList.remove, but the behavior by default
> >> >>shouldn't be
> >> >> > to use className to get rid of all what we have.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > If you work with html directly , is normal to write class="class1
> >> >>class2
> >> >> > ..." and create from scratch
> >> >> >
> >> >> > in Royale you write mxml and as3 and use className to add
> >>additional
> >> >> > classes that are not in the api but not to remove the ones the
> >> >>component
> >> >> > set plus the ones the user "switched" on/off due to properties
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > 2018-03-13 13:42 GMT+01:00 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> No. className is supposed to *replace* the entire classList minus
> >>the
> >> >> >> internally managed ones (i.e. typeNames). Your code drastically
> >> >>changes
> >> >> the
> >> >> >> current behavior.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> You cannot use add for that and replacing the classList will
> >>destroy
> >> >> your
> >> >> >> custom class names.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>> On Mar 13, 2018, at 2:34 PM, Carlos Rovira
> >><carlosrov...@apache.org
> >> >
> >> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> Solving the multiple string value problem:
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> This: <j:TextButton text="PRIMARY" className="myCustomStyle some
> >> >>other"
> >> >> >>> primary="true"/>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> *<button type="button" class="jewel button textbutton
> >>myCustomStyle
> >> >> some
> >> >> >>> other primary" style="margin: 10px 0px 0px; display:
> >> >> >>> block;">PRIMARY</button>*
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> with this change
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> COMPILE::JS
> >> >> >>> protected function setClassName(value:String):void
> >> >> >>> {
> >> >> >>> var classes:Array = value.split(" ");
> >> >> >>> element.classList.add.apply(element.classList, classes);
> >> >> >>> }
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> I think this was all the problems we have right?
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> 2018-03-13 13:20 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira
> >><carlosrov...@apache.org>:
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>> Hi Piotr,
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> that's one of the advantages of a collection, order doesn't
> >> >>matter! :)
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> <j:TextButton text="PRIMARY" className="myCustomStyle"
> >> >> primary="true"/>
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> output:
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> *<button type="button" class="jewel button textbutton
> >>myCustomStyle
> >> >> >>>> primary" style="margin: 10px 0px 0px; display:
> >> >> block;">PRIMARY</button>*
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> this is one of the reason to change, since you'll end trying to
> >> >>figure
> >> >> >>>> what comes in first or not.
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> Do you need more evidence?
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> Thanks
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> 2018-03-13 12:48 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki
> >> >><piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> >> >> >:
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>>> In my example orders matters. Setup first className than your
> >> >> property.
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018, 12:39 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>
> >>wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>> Hi Carlos,
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>> I definitely appreciate the work you are doing. I’m swamped
> >>with
> >> >> work
> >> >> >>>>>> right now, so I don’t have the time to spend helping you.
> >>(Sorry
> >> >> about
> >> >> >>>>>> that.) :-(
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>> I think the discussions here are about pretty minor points.
> >>You
> >> >>can
> >> >> >>>>>> certainly implement jewel how you think makes sense, but if
> >>you
> >> >>want
> >> >> >> to
> >> >> >>>>>> make changes to basic in areas which are not broken, there
> >>needs
> >> >>to
> >> >> >> be a
> >> >> >>>>>> really good reason to do so.
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>> My $0.02,
> >> >> >>>>>> Harbs
> >> >> >>>>>>> On Mar 13, 2018, at 1:31 PM, Carlos Rovira <
> >> >> carlosrov...@apache.org>
> >> >> >>>>>> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>> Hi Piotr,
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>> thanks for your words, but is difficult to work on something
> >> >>when
> >> >> you
> >> >> >>>>>>> believe in your vision and others no, and more over when all
> >>the
> >> >> >> facts
> >> >> >>>>>> you
> >> >> >>>>>>> see corroborates that vision. It's difficult to maintain live
> >> >>the
> >> >> >>>>> moto in
> >> >> >>>>>>> that scenario.
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>> but anyway for you Kindly words
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>> Carlos
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>> 2018-03-13 12:21 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki <
> >> >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> >> >> >>>>>> :
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>> Carlos,
> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>> In my opinion you are not facing the wall from US. You are
> >> >>facing
> >> >> >> the
> >> >> >>>>>> wall
> >> >> >>>>>>>> from lack of volounteers who can help, do the job.
> >> >> >>>>>>>> Believe me your Jewel effort in my list of tasks is almost
> >>on
> >> >>the
> >> >> >>>>> Top. I
> >> >> >>>>>>>> have to fiinish planned work in TranspiledActionScript first
> >> >>and I
> >> >> >>>>> hope
> >> >> >>>>>> to
> >> >> >>>>>>>> join.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>> When it will be - maybe in couple of weeks. In the end
> >> >>something
> >> >> >>>>> have to
> >> >> >>>>>>>> pay the bills and Royale is only fraction of that.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>> I contribute in other related areas. I Wish I could
> >>contribute
> >> >>in
> >> >> >>>>> your
> >> >> >>>>>> way
> >> >> >>>>>>>> or Alex and Peter.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>> Thanks for your work!
> >> >> >>>>>>>> Piotr
> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018, 12:00 Piotr Zarzycki <
> >> >> >>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> >> >> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> I personally said - Go and try, report back. I have gave
> >>you
> >> >>an
> >> >> >> real
> >> >> >>>>>>>> world
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> examples where classList failed. Try and post the results.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> 2018-03-13 11:49 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira <
> >> >> carlosrov...@apache.org
> >> >> >>> :
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> it's very hard to me to invest lot of time both in tryin
> >>to
> >> >> >> develop
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> something useful in the look and feel field for us where
> >>no
> >> >> other
> >> >> >>>>> is
> >> >> >>>>>>>> doing
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> work, trying to explain and discuss all issues I find
> >>without
> >> >> get
> >> >> >>>>> any
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> traction. It's like to face a wall all the time.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Maybe I'm wrong with my proposals but other times my
> >> >>perception
> >> >> is
> >> >> >>>>>> that
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> things are settled in a particular way
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> and we don't want to change it since is working in the
> >> >>current
> >> >> >>>>> state.
> >> >> >>>>>>>> But
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> I
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> think we always where thinking of change things as we
> >>evolve
> >> >> >>>>> Royale.
> >> >> >>>>>>>> We're
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> in a 0.9.2 release, we're not in 1.0, but the way we're
> >> >>managing
> >> >> >>>>> all
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> issues
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> seems to
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> me that we're fine with what we have now and we are
> >>freezing
> >> >>the
> >> >> >>>>> API.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> In all the issues raised last days only CSS compiler
> >>errors
> >> >>are
> >> >> >>>>> real
> >> >> >>>>>>>> bugs,
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> since without that fixes royale can't output concrete CSS
> >> >>rules
> >> >> (I
> >> >> >>>>>> think
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> those not require any discussion)
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> The font injection is maybe another bug (don't know why a
> >> >>class
> >> >> in
> >> >> >>>>> a
> >> >> >>>>>>>> theme
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> is not "visible" by the final app), but can be
> >>workarounded
> >> >>with
> >> >> >> an
> >> >> >>>>>> html
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> that setup the font for now.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Things like classNames discussion are not critical (I
> >>know),
> >> >> it's
> >> >> >>>>>> just a
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> matter to refine the API since I had problems each time I
> >>go
> >> >> that
> >> >> >>>>>> path,
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> first with MDL and now with Jewel. Maybe I'm the only one
> >> >>since
> >> >> no
> >> >> >>>>>> other
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> has tried what I'm trying to do: Creating Themes.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> In my opinion, give the users only a way to manage
> >>classNames
> >> >> vía
> >> >> >>>>>>>> string,
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> is insufficient and cumbersome and deserves at a minimun
> >>some
> >> >> API
> >> >> >>>>>>>> methods
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> since is an important point in how UI is stylized, and how
> >> >> >> controls
> >> >> >>>>>> and
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> objects in html can be "extended" or diferenciated (Alex
> >> >> explained
> >> >> >>>>>> very
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> well the importance of this in the typenames thread). So
> >>some
> >> >> API
> >> >> >>>>> to
> >> >> >>>>>>>> ease
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> that is for me very Wellcome since I'm doing that work,
> >>and
> >> >>will
> >> >> >> be
> >> >> >>>>>> more
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> users doing that work. In this point, I don't think we
> >>should
> >> >> >>>>> shield
> >> >> >>>>>> us
> >> >> >>>>>>>> in
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> things like PAYG or if that is a bit less performant.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> To close and avoid having much discussion to not reach to
> >> >>some
> >> >> >>>>>> valuable
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> point:  I can try to go with what we have, but makes me
> >>feel
> >> >>not
> >> >> >> so
> >> >> >>>>>> good
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> about the continuous rejection of my proposals. As well,
> >>you
> >> >>are
> >> >> >>>>>> saying
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> that we should wait to what users demand...but I'm an
> >>user of
> >> >> the
> >> >> >>>>> API,
> >> >> >>>>>>>> and
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> my perception as a "zero user" seems to be not valuable.
> >> >>Since I
> >> >> >>>>> don't
> >> >> >>>>>>>> get
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> traction on this, I'll try to continue with what we have
> >>and
> >> >> >> report
> >> >> >>>>>> back
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> 2018-03-13 9:24 GMT+01:00 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> +1.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 13, 2018, at 10:08 AM, Alex Harui
> >> >> >>>>> <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> I am so sad and frustrated that we have spent so much
> >>time
> >> >>on
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> managing a
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> set of strings.  I just don't think we have the people
> >> >>power
> >> >> to
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> continue
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> to seek perfection until it is truly needed by a user.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> --
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Carlos Rovira
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >> http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%
> >> >>2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> >> 7Ce137bd7a9095473c2bcc08
> >> >>d588e95a01%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> >> 7C63656545817565873
> >> >>7&sdata=wBMX4vjDjPJZiYA8HcTGKv43mQQbQdaRXJRS%2BM5%2BO5c%3D&reserved=0
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> --
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Piotr Zarzycki
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Patreon:
> >> >>*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pat
> >> >>reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com
> >> %7Ce137bd7a9095
> >> >>473c2bcc08d588e95a01%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> >> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6365654
> >> >>58175658737&sdata=DNkm0Dce279Klqlmt%2BF7YV7%
> >> 2BiDRjzQWyG9GPG1rs2Bw%3D&rese
> >> >>rved=0
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pat
> >> >>reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com
> >> %7Ce137bd7a9095
> >> >>473c2bcc08d588e95a01%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> >> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6365654
> >> >>58175658737&sdata=DNkm0Dce279Klqlmt%2BF7YV7%
> >> 2BiDRjzQWyG9GPG1rs2Bw%3D&rese
> >> >>rved=0>*
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>> --
> >> >> >>>>>>> Carlos Rovira
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >> http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%
> >> >>2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> >> 7Ce137bd7a9095473c2bcc08
> >> >>d588e95a01%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> >> 7C63656545817565873
> >> >>7&sdata=wBMX4vjDjPJZiYA8HcTGKv43mQQbQdaRXJRS%2BM5%2BO5c%3D&reserved=0
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> --
> >> >> >>>> Carlos Rovira
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >> http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%
> >> >>2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> >> 7Ce137bd7a9095473c2bcc08
> >> >>d588e95a01%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> >> 7C63656545817565873
> >> >>7&sdata=wBMX4vjDjPJZiYA8HcTGKv43mQQbQdaRXJRS%2BM5%2BO5c%3D&reserved=0
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> --
> >> >> >>> Carlos Rovira
> >> >> >>>
> >> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >> http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%
> >> >>2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> >> 7Ce137bd7a9095473c2bcc08
> >> >>d588e95a01%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> >> 7C63656545817565873
> >> >>7&sdata=wBMX4vjDjPJZiYA8HcTGKv43mQQbQdaRXJRS%2BM5%2BO5c%3D&reserved=0
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > --
> >> >> > Carlos Rovira
> >> >> >
> >> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >> http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%
> >> >>2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> >> 7Ce137bd7a9095473c2bcc08
> >> >>d588e95a01%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> >> 7C63656545817565873
> >> >>7&sdata=wBMX4vjDjPJZiYA8HcTGKv43mQQbQdaRXJRS%2BM5%2BO5c%3D&reserved=0
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >--
> >> >Carlos Rovira
> >> >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >> http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2
> >> >Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> >> 7Ce137bd7a9095473c2bcc08d5
> >> >88e95a01%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> >> 7C636565458175658737&s
> >> >data=wBMX4vjDjPJZiYA8HcTGKv43mQQbQdaRXJRS%2BM5%2BO5c%3D&reserved=0
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >--
> >Carlos Rovira
> >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2
> >Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> 7Cce849efb1cf84ab780ae08d5
> >8905f78a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636565581091621628&s
> >data=5bptuicHsczeSJ84dMNT8%2FFZG42Ai732OmY8QCEbgXo%3D&reserved=0
>
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira

Reply via email to