It's not about the minor changes in his app in my opinion. In the result of
the discussion it may end up that you will revert everything and solution
will be completely different. What will be the experience of the created
app on the user sight ?

2018-05-17 10:05 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org>:

> Hi Harbs,
>
> that was returned to the old way, actually we have the same than before
> refactor:
>
> import org.apache.royale.html.Group;
>
> public class NodeElementBase extends Group
>
> Maybe the problem is that we don't have any example of ButtonBar in
> examples? and thus I was not aware of that concrete component?
>
> I'll try to see that and if we need, I'll create and example now for that.
>
> The change to solve this in your code base is really easy and direct:
>
> search all "import org.apache.royale.html.supportClasses.DataGroup;" and
> replace with "import org.apache.royale.core.DataGroup;"
>
> (for me is clear that DataGroup is a Core piece, that will be used not as
> Basic or Jewel implementation, but as a "core" piece used for the rest of
> UI sets)
>
> I'll be looking at it right now
>
> Thanks for exposing it! :)
>
> Carlos
>
>
>
> 2018-05-17 8:49 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Having trouble getting this email to “take”. Trying a paste link
> instead...
> >
> > It looks like it does have issues.
> >
> > I just pulled the 0.9.3 branch.
> >
> > I get a lot of these warnings when I compile the framework:
> > https://paste.apache.org/Wy9t <https://paste.apache.org/Wy9t>
> >
> > I used it to compile my app, and I get runtime errors due to missing
> > components. This seems to be due to HTML not subclassing Group.
> >
> > Here’s an example of elements which go AWAL:
> > https://paste.apache.org/s9og <https://paste.apache.org/s9og>
> >
> > Everything below “ul" is missing.
> >
> > Harbs
> >
> > > On May 16, 2018, at 10:45 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID
> > <mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID>> wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm pretty sure the branches were cut before the changes in question.
> > You can pull down the branches and build them to verify.  Or look at
> their
> > history on GitHub.
> > >
> > > Om, did you see a date for when Maven SCM would be released?  The only
> > response I got from the Maven folks was to build Maven SCM from sources.
> > If it is going to be more than a week, I might actually try that.
> > >
> > > -Alex
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>



-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
<https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*

Reply via email to