@harbs could that become a blog entry? On Wed, Jul 4, 2018, 2:19 PM Harbs, <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Possibly. > > The way Hammer.js works is that you attach it to an element and create an > instance of it or a controller. The specific touch events need to be > specified. > > > On Jul 4, 2018, at 7:34 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: > > > > Harbs, > > > > Can we wrap Hammer.js into more easily reusable TouchControllers in > Royale? > > > > IMO, it doesn't matter if it is a can of worms. Royale hopefully makes > it easy to replace TouchControllers. So you can write one that mostly > works and if someone offers a better one at some point, you can switch to > that. We won't bake one into the components and make the user wait for a > next release to get improvements. > > > > My 2 cents, > > -Alex > > > > On 7/4/18, 9:26 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Carlos, > > > > Touch support is a can of worms. > > > > Basic touch support comes for free from Mouse Events. Anything more > than that, gets very complex very quickly. > > > > I use Hammer.js in my own app to handle touch, and it works very well. > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhammerjs.github.io%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C69560100ba4747a4e52808d5e1cae3c3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636663183877387695&sdata=8By2PeXtYHtWAy9%2BwBFwvW3CdtAEx%2Fly80MJCO8oqtM%3D&reserved=0 > < > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhammerjs.github.io%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C69560100ba4747a4e52808d5e1cae3c3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636663183877387695&sdata=8By2PeXtYHtWAy9%2BwBFwvW3CdtAEx%2Fly80MJCO8oqtM%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > Harbs > > > >> On Jul 4, 2018, at 4:47 PM, Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I'm looking how to provide touch support for Drawer so users can slide > out. > >> Is a default behavior in this kind of components. > >> > >> I'm seeing there's no TouchEvent or something similar. I think this is > an > >> important flaw, since not having this is like to say we are not prepared > >> for mobile and in the end we lost users. > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Carlos Rovira > >> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C69560100ba4747a4e52808d5e1cae3c3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636663183877387695&sdata=7j8FPbQ59eU0hMPOLfelshVI6DDqVCJtLrxGWpK4MVQ%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > >
