Hi Alex,
We have 3 files in our Project
Files Path is :
[1]Project -> applications.mxml (main file)
[2]Project ->shmApplication.as extends mx.core.Application
[3]Project-> AppView_ERP.mxml
As MX ViewStack , Canvas are working controls.
AppView_ERP.mxml has initial tag mx:Canvas
applications.mxml has initial tag cc:shmApplication and
We have method in applications.mxml
private function fn_roBasicConfRH(e:ResultEvent):void
{
var appViewStack:ViewStack = new ViewStack();
appViewStack.percentWidth = 100;
appViewStack.percentHeight = 100;
this.addElement(appViewStack);
var compERPView:Canvas = new AppView_ERP() as
Canvas;
compERPView.id = "appView_ERP";
appView = compERPView;
appViewStack.addElement(compERPView);
mx.external.ExternalInterface.call("function setWinStatus(){window.status='" +
iniFileParams.CompanyName + "';}");
}
Application is compiled Successfully but nothing shows in output.
If you need more details. I can create an example Project.
Thanks in Advance,
Alina Kazi
-----Original Message-----
From: Alina Kazi [mailto:alina.k...@d-bz.com]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2018 3:35 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: RE: Getting An Emulation Component To Run
Hi Alex,
We have replaced import spark.components.Application with import
mx.core.Application in our whole Application. After this change we are still
able to compile our Application successfully.
Are you using SWFLoader to load other applications? Again, your API Report did
not mention this.
We are not using SWFLoader anywhere in our Application. We are using
ModuleLoader only.
What do you mean by needing Spark Application many times?
Sorry, import spark.components.Application is written multiple times in src
code but used once.
That means now we don't need Spark Application.
Thanks for Helping us.
-Alina Kazi
-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2018 12:45 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run
Hi Alina,
Where did you use mx:Application in your application? Somehow it got into the
report.
What do you mean by needing Spark Application many times? Are you using
SWFLoader to load other applications? Again, your API Report did not mention
this.
Getting Application to work can be significant amount of work as it has a lot
of things to do. One approach you could take is to step through your example
with mx:Application and compare it to the Spark Application and make changes to
the Spark Application until it works, but I'm concerned that you can't always
copy code from mx:Application.
If you want to take on a big challenge like getting Appilcation to work that is
fine, but I guess I can delay my work on Charts and get Spark Application to
work. Let me know what you decide. But I am very concerned about the accuracy
of the data you have provided. I'm wondering what else you are using that we
don't know about.
I'm done for today. I will see what you decide in my morning.
-Alex
On 10/26/18, 12:22 AM, "Alina Kazi" <alina.k...@d-bz.com> wrote:
Hi Alex ,
I am using skinClass 2 times overall in my Application. I can skip that if
it takes a lot of time.
I don't know How API report skip some API's.
We need SparkApplication at many places in our Application.
If you can explain more in [1] , we want to also participate in getting
emulation component to run.
Like Spark TextInput is now working as MX TextInput, We have copied some
source from MX TextInput to Spark TextInput after reading [1] and it worked.
[1]
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FEmulation-Components%23getting-an-emulation-component-to-run&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C7c6b818c69de4dbb9f6908d63b13d563%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636761353707149252&sdata=wEZxyawLMz0VF3Jb7fVcA2bHtBCRz0UzUG4E1l1qXAU%3D&reserved=0
Thanks in Advance,
Alina Kazi
-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2018 11:50 AM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run
Hi Alina,
In your API report, only mx.core.Application was referenced. I don't
understand why Spark Application was not referenced, yet you are using it now.
We have not spent any time getting Spark Application to run. If that's really
what you need, I would start copying code from mx.core.Application. if you
don't have custom skins for Application, you can probably skip the
skinning-related code.
Good luck,
-Alex
On 10/25/18, 11:10 PM, "Alina Kazi" <alina.k...@d-bz.com> wrote:
Hi ,
We are able to compile our Application and Library Projects
successfully. Application Launch file uses a file that extends Spark
Application.as file. This Spark Application.as file is present in Apache
Royale SDK repo and has been emulated. But when we run the application, No
visual output is shown in index.html (i.e output file)
Spark Application extends SkinnableContainer in Flex SDK default.css
for SkinnableContainer is:
SkinnableContainer
{
skinClass:
ClassReference("spark.skins.spark.SkinnableContainerSkin");
}
In Flex mx:Application extends LayoutContainer extends Container in
Flex SDK default.css for Container is
Container
{
borderSkin: ClassReference("mx.skins.spark.ContainerBorderSkin");
borderStyle: "none";
cornerRadius: 0;
}
You have added in MXRoyale default.css
Container
{
IBeadView:
ClassReference("org.apache.royale.html.beads.ContainerView");
IBeadLayout:
ClassReference("org.apache.royale.html.beads.layouts.BasicLayout");
IViewport:
ClassReference("org.apache.royale.html.supportClasses.ScrollingViewport");
IViewportModel:
ClassReference("org.apache.royale.html.beads.models.ViewportModel");
}
And mx:Application shows output.
For Example :
[1] Nothing in Output
<s:Application
xmlns:fx="https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fns.adobe.com%2Fmxml%2F2009&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C7c6b818c69de4dbb9f6908d63b13d563%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636761353707149252&sdata=RQwMJaTLRNGo48o0BNsRqAP814fWlszWo%2BCslBKOzOY%3D&reserved=0";
xmlns:s="library://ns.apache.org/royale/spark"
xmlns:mx="library://ns.apache.org/royale/mx" height = "100%" width = "100%"
>
<s:Button x="30" y="30" id="searchBtn"
label="Search"/>
</s:Application>
[2] It shows Button in output file
<mx:Application
xmlns:fx="https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fns.adobe.com%2Fmxml%2F2009&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C7c6b818c69de4dbb9f6908d63b13d563%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636761353707149252&sdata=RQwMJaTLRNGo48o0BNsRqAP814fWlszWo%2BCslBKOzOY%3D&reserved=0";
xmlns:s="library://ns.apache.org/royale/spark"
xmlns:mx="library://ns.apache.org/royale/mx" height = "100%" width = "100%"
>
<s:Button x="30" y="30" id="searchBtn"
label="Search"/>
</mx:Application>
How can I get Spark Application working as MX Application ?
Thanks,
Alina
-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2018 10:04 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run
Hi Alina,
Again, I cannot help you as efficiently if you do not provide important
details.
You are showing some part of the console for building the application.
But did the compiler hang, or did it think it finished? What does your
build.xml look like? What was the full console output? I would want to see
what command you typed and all output up to and including the command prompt
after it finished. As I mentioned in prior emails, use paste.apache.org if
necessary for large quantities of console output.
From the one line you pasted below, it implied the build did not
finish, yet you are saying that you tried to run it and nothing showed up. Why
would you try to run it if the build did not finish? If the build did finish,
did you get the expected output files? If the build did not finish, try
stripping down what is in the Module until it works, or compare the build.xml
settings against examples/mxroyale/tourdeflexmodules.
There are so many ways things can go wrong, especially when developing
new code. You must learn how to work efficiently in these conditions.
Another technique is to compare working against non-working.
Examples/mxroyale/tourdeflexmodules is able to compile and load modules. You
can set breakpoints in the tourdeflexmodules code and follow how it works and
set breakpoints in similar places in your code and follow how it works and
compares.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 10/22/18, 1:12 AM, "Alina Kazi" <alina.k...@d-bz.com> wrote:
Hi Alex,
This time I told you about folders hierarchy its same as
examples/royale/ModuleExample.
js:UIModuleLoader is replaced with mx:ModuleLoader url property
is added in ModuleLoader and extra properties are removed, js:UIModule is
replaced with mx:Module
js:Application is replaced with mx:Application
namespace is replaced with mx namespace
Console output stopped at :
[mxmlc] 109142 bytes written to
D:\apache-royale-0.9.3-bin-js-swf\royale-asjs\examples\royale\ModuleExample\Module\bin-debug\Module.swf
in 3.220 seconds
How else I can explain it in a better way.
Simply I just want same working like examples/royale/ModuleExample
with Mx Controls.
I am not using TitleWindow in my current example.
Thanks,
Alina Kazi
-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2018 12:40 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run
Hi Alina,
Again, half a world away, I cannot know what your folder structure
and build files look like, or what you tried or didn't try. And now, I have to
stop working and we missed an opportunity to help you because the important
information was not provided in your earlier email. I wrote some techniques in
this email:
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.apache.org%2Fthread.html%2Fe6f3aa4010dca8c9bdbe2828a89295039d05d23806a5fe03ae18dbe4%40%253Cdev.royale.apache.org%253E&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C7c6b818c69de4dbb9f6908d63b13d563%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636761353707149252&sdata=L%2BE30bCLEQ1bNZZmN00nxfIbz3CqEJSBCzN%2Fqu6uLTs%3D&reserved=0
In your next email, I expect you see evidence that you have
understood and tried the techniques in the email I linked. You will be
expected to provide console output or information about the tree of elements.
And this might be a good opportunity for you to try the debugger and set
breakpoints in various places. Even if you don't actually solve the problem
you are facing, you are going to have to become an expert in debugging
JavaScript output from the Royale Compiler.
Please reserve the time to write a really good email with the
important information and questions. It will save all of us time.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 10/21/18, 11:39 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
Hi Alina,
The key piece for modules is getting the output in the right
place. Flex/Flash has some interesting rules around how URLs got loaded. I
haven't found a practical way to replicate that in the Browser, so for now, it
is up to you to put the output where you are telling ModuleLoader to load it.
If you look at the Ant build.xml for royale/ModuleExample, the
Module/build.xml assumes the MainApp has been built first and copies its output
files into the MainApp's output folders.
If you look at the build.xml for mxroyale/touredeflexexamples,
it uses the -module-output compiler option to redirect the output.
If you look in the Browser console, I expect you will see
errors that it couldn’t find a particular JS file for the module. Pay
attention to the folders and adjust your build script to place the output in
the right place (or adjust where you tell ModuleLoader to find the module.
HTH,
-Alex
On 10/21/18, 11:22 PM, "Alina Kazi" <alina.k...@d-bz.com> wrote:
Hi Alex,
Created an example contains two files :
1. Module.mxml
<mx:Module
xmlns:fx="https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fns.adobe.com%2Fmxml%2F2009&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C7c6b818c69de4dbb9f6908d63b13d563%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636761353707149252&sdata=RQwMJaTLRNGo48o0BNsRqAP814fWlszWo%2BCslBKOzOY%3D&reserved=0";
xmlns:mx="library://ns.apache.org/royale/mx">
<mx:Label text="This Label is in the module" />
<mx:TextInput id="ti" text="This TextInput is also in
the module" />
</mx:Module>
2. MainApp.mxml
<mx:Application
xmlns:fx="https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fns.adobe.com%2Fmxml%2F2009&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C7c6b818c69de4dbb9f6908d63b13d563%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636761353707149252&sdata=RQwMJaTLRNGo48o0BNsRqAP814fWlszWo%2BCslBKOzOY%3D&reserved=0";
xmlns:mx="library://ns.apache.org/royale/mx" >
<mx:Button label="Btn in Application" />
<mx:ModuleLoader id = "ml1" x="30" y="30" url =
"Module.swf" />
</mx:Application>
No visual output shown . I want it to work like
examples\royale\ModuleExample
Thanks in Advance ,
Alina Kazi
-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID]
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2018 9:33 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run
Hi Alina,
I think there is a misunderstanding somewhere.
How has your company built the Flex app over the past
years? Is it all from an IDE or do you have some sort of script or build tool?
Whatever you are using to build the Flex app should be
translated to the Ant script. What is currently in the Ant script you copied
from tourdeflexmodules is custom designed for tourdeflexmodules. It presumes
lots of little applications that don't use custom libraries.
The mxmlc task in Ant is just like running mxml from the
command line or having an Application project in an IDE.
The compc task in Ant is just like running compc from the
command line or having a Library project in an IDE.
You can see from the build.xml files in the royale-asjs
repo that we build SWCs by having a build.xml in each library folder and
calling them from a build.xml in a parent folder. You might find that pattern
useful.
You will need to understand the -source-path and
-library-path and -external-library-path and other compiler options that were
used to build the Flex app and copy probably all of those options into the
right place in the Ant scripts.
It would be uncommon to compile a file called shmUtil with
mxmlc. shmUtil sounds like a file in a library, not a standalone application.
I'll bet it comes from a library that should be compiled with compc along with
a lot of other files.
If you are having trouble with Ant, also try the
command-line, then others may be able to help you see the differences between
your Ant script and what worked on the command-line. If you use an IDE to
build the Flex app, you will need to find out all of the compiler options the
IDE sets up for you. I think others can help you with that as well.
-Alex
On 10/16/18, 2:17 AM, "Alina Kazi" <alina.k...@d-bz.com>
wrote:
Hi Alex,
Created a mxmlc task directly in build.xml still an
error is occured :
Added to Build.xml :
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FwBDm&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C7c6b818c69de4dbb9f6908d63b13d563%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636761353707149252&sdata=CyQofwZXxRS2RZPSxPaAaR2OPGkeLIjB2ZdXuOXExKA%3D&reserved=0
Error :
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FOXFT&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C7c6b818c69de4dbb9f6908d63b13d563%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636761353707159256&sdata=RcNxd8Vc4s4ks3P%2BY8zwAmJ97plf6P7XAbAFZ3bUg%2FI%3D&reserved=0
Thanks,
Alina Kazi
-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID]
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2018 11:46 AM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run
Hi Alina,
The example in examples/mxroyale/RemoteObjectAMFTest is
working and accesses the server that is in examples/amf/ SampleAmfWebApp.
Theoretically, your old mx:RemoteObject code should work untouched. Try it
without touching it and tell us what kinds of errors you are getting. If you
are getting runtime errors, see how the RemoteObjectAMFTest uses "casting" to
be explicit about the types of the RemoteObject expressions. You'll see "as
Operation" to indicate that an mx:method in an mx:RemoteObject is an Operation.
The compile-mxml macro is in the build.xml file. It
has certain expectations of the structure of the source files. Your source
files are likely have a different folder structure. You will need to add
source-paths and other compiler options to the macro, or stop using the macro
and call the mxmlc ant task directly. That is up to you. This is a good
opportunity to get to know Ant and the compiler better.
HTH,
-Alex
On 10/15/18, 11:07 PM, "Alina Kazi"
<alina.k...@d-bz.com> wrote:
Hi Alex & Carlos,
I haven't tested my ported Application with server
side functionality yet.
Can you please share an Example that I can follow
to get my mx:RemoteObject working as FLEX.
I have another question
I am working on my Application and it has two
different directories like com->shm->modules->AP and
com->shm->modules->components and I want to compile a file inside
com->shm->modules->AP->abc.mxml and it uses a file inside
com->shm->modules->components->xyz.mxml.
I have added <compile-mxml
folder="/com/shm/modules/AP/" example=" abc"/> to build.xml.
unable to access xyz inside abc.
Like
D:\apache-royale-0.9.3-bin-js-swf\royale-asjs\examples\mxroyale\tourdeflexmodules\src\spark\components\
VideoPlayerExample.mxml is using VideoPlayer.mxml in my case
VideoPlayer.mxml is not is the same directory.
Thanks,
Alina Kazi
-----Original Message-----
From: Carlos Rovira
[mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2018 12:26 AM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run
Hi Alex,
yes, I added those classes when worked trying to
make it work in net RO, but I found a wall at that time. I think DSK objects
had a different code when deserialized, and our AMF implementation was not able
to handle that.
I was not able to know how to deal with that so I
had to abandon. At least I could pass that disabling small messages on BlazeDS.
I don't think Small Messages are very important,
don't know how "small"
will be, so I think we can go to other things more
important. If I found some problem as I start to grow my application that could
be related to small messages I'll report. Hope not find any issue
The only drawback could be people coming that must
know they need to disable small messages on their BlazeDS.
I think it will be more important later since
IExternalizable in itself seems an important addition.
Thanks
Carlos
El lun., 15 oct. 2018 a las 20:21, Alex Harui
(<aha...@adobe.com.invalid>)
escribió:
> The classes that represent DSK, DSA and DSC are
in the MXRoyale and
> Network projects, but it looks like they
implement IExternalizable. I
> don't see any evidence that the JS AMF support
currently handles
> IExternalizable.
>
> I'm not clear on how important SmallMessages and
IExternalizable are.
> If it isn't that important, there are plenty of
other things to work
> on. If it is important, do we have a test case
that uses IExternalizable?
>
> -Alex
>
> On 10/15/18, 10:55 AM, "Carlos Rovira"
<carlosrov...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Yes,
>
> I tried today (with code pre-callProperty,
that I think does not make
> difference for this).
> There's small message support in RPC classes,
but when I looked at that
> code when I investigate it, I think must be
accompanied from some AMF
> serialization/deserialization support. I
couldn't find any resources on
> this in the internet about how to handle DSK,
DSA or DSC. Maybe
> you can ask
> internally in Adobe how to deal with that. My
guess is that this
> was added
> to Flash plugin AMF serialization
capabilities.
>
>
>
>
> El lun., 15 oct. 2018 a las 19:03, Alex Harui
> (<aha...@adobe.com.invalid>)
> escribió:
>
> > Carlos,
> >
> > Have you verified that small messages do
not work with the MX
> > RemoteObject? I thought I saw Small
Message support when I was
> migrating
> > the code.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 10/15/18, 10:01 AM, "Carlos Rovira"
<carlosrov...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Alina,
> >
> > just for if you don't know. If you use
BlazeDS Java server,
> remember
> > to set
> > up small messages to false, or you
RemoteObjects will not work.
> To get
> > small messages we'll need to upgrade AMF
> serialization-deserialization
> > to
> > know how to handle DSK, DSA, and DSC
RemoteClass aliases.
> >
> > Best
> >
> > Carlos
> >
> >
> > El lun., 15 oct. 2018 a las 18:39, Alex
Harui
> > (<aha...@adobe.com.invalid>)
> > escribió:
> >
> > > Hi Alina,
> > >
> > > Good to know. You (and anybody
working with the emulation
> > components) are
> > > expected to keep track of the commits
to the royale-compiler
> as well
> > as the
> > > royale-asjs repos and stay updated.
We are still finding bugs
> in the
> > > transpiling that may affect you.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 10/15/18, 2:17 AM, "Alina Kazi"
<alina.k...@d-bz.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Alex,
> > >
> > > Thanks a lot it worked for me.
> > >
> > > -Alina kazi
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Alex Harui
[mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID]
> > > Sent: Monday, October 15, 2018
2:07 PM
> > > To: dev@royale.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation
Component To Run
> > >
> > > Hi Alina,
> > >
> > > Are you sure you are using the
latest compiler? Try
> compiling
> > >
examples/mxroyale/RemoteObjectAMFTest. It compiles without
> errors
> > for me.
> > >
> > > I have to stop for tonight.
Hopefully others will help
> you.
> > >
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 10/15/18, 1:37 AM, "Alina
Kazi" <alina.k...@d-bz.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Alex,
> > > We are using MX Remote Object
in almost our every
> Class like
> > this:
> > > <mx:RemoteObject
> >
channelSet="{parentApplication.amfChannelSet}"
> > > id="DataProviderService"
showBusyCursor="true"
> > >
> > > destination="shmBasic"
fault="handleFault(event);"
> > >
> > > result="handleResult(event);" />
> > > We get error ASBlocker
subsystem.
> > > When we comment RemoteObject
we need to comment methods
> > those are
> > > using it.
> > >
> > > I agree with that if I will
delete some code for
> compilation
> > I
> > > will face other issues at later stage.
> > >
> > > Can I replace mx:remoteObject
with :
> > > <s:RemoteObject id="ro"
endpoint="
> > >
> >
>
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jamesward.com%2Fcensus2-tests%2Fmessagebroker%2Famf&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C7c6b818c69de4dbb9f6908d63b13d563%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636761353707159256&sdata=7GJvpDveb5dbyOpOtqwbHnLbiQLnlrEIwHm8FY7FTRE%3D&reserved=0
> > "
> > > destination="census"/>
> > >
> > > Thanks in Advance,
> > > Alina Kazi
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Alex Harui
[mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID]
> > > Sent: Monday, October 15,
2018 1:16 PM
> > > To: dev@royale.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: Getting An
Emulation Component To Run
> > >
> > > Hi Alina,
> > >
> > > I recommend just running the
compiled application and
> fixing
> > > problems as you run into them.
> > >
> > > If you start copying code and
deleting other code, you
> cannot
> > > guarantee that the results will run.
I'm not even sure
> TitleWindow
> > is a
> > > valid child control of an
Application. Usually it is a popup
> dialog.
> > >
> > > When you run the application,
you will probably find
> > exceptions in
> > > the console. Set a breakpoint, see
if you can figure out why
> it is
> > > generating an exception. Change the
code as needed.
> > >
> > > If you aren’t getting
exceptions, then look at the
> element
> > tree.
> > > Either all of the expected elements
have been created or not.
> If
> > not, then
> > > look at the innermost element to see
what it is. In the
> properties
> > for the
> > > element is a royale_wrapper property
that points to the
> transpiled
> > AS3
> > > class. That can help you know what
class didn't create its
> children.
> > > Check the _beads array of that class
to see if it created its
> beads
> > or
> > > not. If not, check the CSS for that
element, or debug into
> its code.
> > > Usually, addedToParent is where the
view bead is added.
> > >
> > > If the elements have been
created, check the sizes.
> Often
> > some of
> > > them will have width or height = 0.
Try to figure why it is
> getting
> > a bad
> > > size.
> > >
> > > If you take this approach,
then if you get stuck you
> can ask
> > a
> > > much more specific question and we
can give you more specific
> > answers.
> > >
> > > Unfortunately, our days only
overlap by a few hours,
> but I
> > hope
> > > other committers can help as well.
It is in their best
> interest to
> > improve
> > > their help and debugging skills.
> > >
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 10/15/18, 12:59 AM, "Alina
Kazi" <
> alina.k...@d-bz.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Alex,
> > > As our whole application
is compiled successfully
> without
> > > error as a part of SparkRoyale
Library.
> > >
> > > Now, We have created a
project like
> tourdeflexmodules to
> > > compile and visually see the
application output.
> > > Initially started with
the basic(small) file of our
> > > application that is used by most of
the files of our
> Application.
> > >
> > > We have a file in our
application "Picklist.mxml"
> > > It was actually like :
> > > [1]
> > >
> >
>
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FRVtj&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C7c6b818c69de4dbb9f6908d63b13d563%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636761353707159256&sdata=LI7kC1VOo2NpxzAVOR0tu2OrDG9fNeo3Qk0vwD8HOpo%3D&reserved=0
> > >
> > > we want to see it
visually as all our mx and spark
> > controls
> > > are already added in Apache Royale.
> > > Deleted whole code accept
visual controls from src
> file :
> > > [2]
> > >
> >
>
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FH4Sm&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C7c6b818c69de4dbb9f6908d63b13d563%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636761353707159256&sdata=oi6gY54TyplwWrQ1N%2BmONwdUaLO%2FSY%2FPhecgMqHOGlg%3D&reserved=0
> > >
> > > Nothing shows inside
spark BorderContainer &
> TitleWindow.
> > > [3]
> > >
> >
>
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FEpS8&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C7c6b818c69de4dbb9f6908d63b13d563%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636761353707159256&sdata=ddTjjxt1kcfHa3pcewOUa0dyLFhkUhjsq%2FaPZ%2BwjWCc%3D&reserved=0
> > > How can we see all visual
controls as they were in
> Flex
> > of
> > > this particular file.
> > > Even spark
BorderContainer default.css is copied
> from
> > Flex
> > > ->Royale.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Alina Kazi
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Alex Harui
[mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID]
> > > Sent: Monday, October 15,
2018 11:15 AM
> > > To: dev@royale.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: Getting An
Emulation Component To Run
> > >
> > > Hi Alina,
> > >
> > > Different APIs will have
different solutions.
> Pick an
> > API you
> > > want to have work and let's discuss
how to make it work.
> > >
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 10/14/18, 10:48 PM,
"Alina Kazi" <
> alina.k...@d-bz.com
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Alex,
> > >
> > > All mx and spark
class methods those were left
> empty
> > for
> > > the compilation of Application.
> > > Also Module does not
show anything on screen.
> > >
> > > Thanks in Advance,
> > > Alina
> > >
> > > -----Original
Message-----
> > > From: Alex Harui
[mailto:
> aha...@adobe.com.INVALID]
> > > Sent: Thursday,
October 11, 2018 12:32 PM
> > > To:
dev@royale.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: Getting
An Emulation Component To
> Run
> > >
> > > Hi Alina,
> > >
> > > Which components or
properties are you trying
> to get
> > to
> > > run?
> > >
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 10/10/18, 10:40
PM, "Alina Kazi" <
> > alina.k...@d-bz.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Alex,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > What if CSS for a
component is not written
> in
> > Basic /
> > > Express defaults.css?
> > >
> > > And We need it in
MXRoyale / SparkRoyale
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Alina Kazi
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From: Alex Harui
[mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
> > > Sent: Monday,
October 08, 2018 8:40 PM
> > > To: Alina Kazi
> > > Subject: Re:
Getting An Emulation
> Component To
> > Run
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Alina,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Please ask these
questions on dev@ as
> well.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > CSS with
ClassReference is a way to use
> > Composition to
> > > customize components. Copying code
is usually a bad practice
> as it
> > > creates maintenance issues. So, in
general, the preference
> should
> > be to
> > > use CSS.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > HTH,
> > >
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From: Alina Kazi
<alina.k...@d-bz.com>
> > > Date: Monday,
October 8, 2018 at 2:02 AM
> > > To: Alex Harui
<aha...@adobe.com>
> > > Subject: Getting
An Emulation Component To
> Run
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Alex,
> > >
> > > We want to know
how can we identify which
> is the
> > right
> > > stub?
> > >
> > > For Example:
selected property written
> > differently in
> > > CheckBox, RadioButton and
> > >
> > > we want selected
property for Button. How
> can we
> > > identify and pick the right code for
Button?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 1. copying
the little bits of code
> from the
> > > Basic or Express version into the
right stub in the Emulation
> > Component
> > >
> > > 2. copying
the CSS from Basic or
> Express
> > > defaults.css into the MXRoyale or
SparkRoyale defaults.css
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks in Advance,
> > >
> > > Alina Kazi
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> >
> >
>
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C7c6b818c69de4dbb9f6908d63b13d563%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636761353707159256&sdata=HFp%2FC4U7r9tvPlhUTcEj2F0DJ0m1f97KgCvyM8%2BX5Xs%3D&reserved=0
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
>
>
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.
>
me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C04eb29f37fce
>
40d3df9908d632c77330%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6367
>
52229546474497&sdata=7S2M%2BRlyCsWd2pShdvTsjfyJp9xyZ5bdaAc3zZQrilU
> %3D&reserved=0
>
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C7c6b818c69de4dbb9f6908d63b13d563%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636761353707159256&sdata=HFp%2FC4U7r9tvPlhUTcEj2F0DJ0m1f97KgCvyM8%2BX5Xs%3D&reserved=0
