Hi, I did it in pre:
https://royale.codeoscopic.com/download/ https://royale.codeoscopic.com/get-involved/ will push it tomorrow if nobody suggest any other change thanks Carlos El mié., 16 oct. 2019 a las 21:27, Alex Harui (<[email protected]>) escribió: > Sounds ok to me. > > On 10/16/19, 12:21 PM, "Carlos Rovira" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > thanks all for sharing ideas on how to deal with this issue. For what I > read I like some of them. > > We already have a "Get Involved" page (most of the time with forget we > have > menu options in the footer bar and top level menu options are only a > subset > of what we think "most important" for newcomers). > With that page in mind, I think we have solve the "creation of a new > page". > We can use that. > > What I see more easy is then is to move the nightly builds section to > that > page, so we are done. > > Let me know what you think. > > Carlos > > > > El mié., 16 oct. 2019 a las 18:38, Alex Harui > (<[email protected]>) > escribió: > > > The principle behind the policy is not ridiculous. AIUI, it is > important > > that the general public only downloads artifacts that the PMC has > approved > > as an act of the foundation, otherwise the foundation's ability to > provide > > a legal shield for release managers is weakened. > > > > I mostly agree that the way the word "might" in the policy is being > > interpreted is "ridiculous". I really don't think the general > public is > > being encouraged to download our nightly builds the way the current > site > > reads. However, both Justin and I warned about the wording on the > download > > page [1] before it went live because we've seen other projects get > > disrupted by similar nitpicking. AFAICT, the trend at the ASF is to > > continue to be more restrictive about the word "might" and make it > harder > > to find links to nightly builds on project websites. Other projects > that > > used to have links or links "below the fold" no longer do when I went > > looking just now. It won't be worth it to fight it, so let's just > plan on > > changing. > > > > I see other projects with separate pages, but there is always a > chance > > that someday the word "might" will be restricted even more to include > > separate pages. I'm not making the changes to the site, so I'll > leave it > > up to those who are doing the work to decide. > > > > IMO, with that in mind, when I look at the current site, it is almost > > entirely tuned towards our users. The only place we invite folks to > > contribute is way down on the landing page. And the page that takes > you to > > is about mailing lists. I guess you could say that the GitHub link > is an > > implied indicator that we're an open source project and that you > should > > contribute. > > > > So, here are my ideas. Feel free to reject them all: > > > > 1) Move the nightly build portion of the download page to a wiki > page in > > GitHub. > > 2) Add a "Get Involved" or "Contributing" menu item similar to what > Harbs > > suggested that goes to a different page like Andrew suggested > > 3) Replace the GitHub menu item with the "Get Involved" or > "Contributing" > > menu item > > 4) Add analytics to the nightly build links so we can see how many > people > > click it > > 5) Add a popup to the link to the nightly build so folks must agree > to the > > disclaimers. > > > > I recommend that we just do #1 and move on. We've got plenty of > other > > things to work on. > > > > My 2 cents, > > -Alex > > > > [1] > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.apache.org%2Fthread.html%2F8564ab5687c631bd4961bf8b987a5e9d30d6673d5050f72b8a9aaa53%40%253Cdev.royale.apache.org%253E&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C3069e9eec31c4fc643fd08d7526e02de%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637068504849942445&sdata=2LPwIowIFGZmQ%2FzCMYeq8xPcXKJKBQPPkqpX41U3V40%3D&reserved=0 > > > > On 10/16/19, 7:08 AM, "Josh Tynjala" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Hopefully a separate public page is allowed. What a ridiculous > policy! > > > > -- > > Josh Tynjala > > Bowler Hat LLC < > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbowlerhat.dev&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C3069e9eec31c4fc643fd08d7526e02de%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637068504849942445&sdata=NquMJTtJe9gbR1%2FnBTzhxcviBJ4YJP1gwF6vSXMBzSE%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 6:30 AM Andrew Wetmore < > [email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Can they have their own dedicated page, wreathed around with > > cautions and > > > disclaimers to scare away folks who should not be using them? > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 9:42 AM Carlos Rovira < > > [email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > we get request to remove Nightly builds from download page > (see > > issue in > > > > GitHub below). > > > > I open this thread to discuss where is better place for it. > > > > > > > > thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > El mié., 16 oct. 2019 a las 14:26, GitBox (<[email protected]>) > > escribió: > > > > > > > > > carlosrovira commented on issue #498: Nightly builds must > not be > > > promoted > > > > > on download pages > > > > > URL: > > > > > > > > > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fissues%2F498%23issuecomment-542675010&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C3069e9eec31c4fc643fd08d7526e02de%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637068504849942445&sdata=Z6dNjKh0aqBGikhqbsyBdU4vjPWVmU5WVbjttchDqv0%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I searched to the place in our mailing list that seems > to be > > the > > > > source > > > > > of the actual state for nightly on download page: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com%2FNeed-help-with-CSS-class-selector-font-family-is-always-Arial-tp1418p1485.html&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C3069e9eec31c4fc643fd08d7526e02de%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637068504849942445&sdata=E%2FKOMhp%2BiAXYz0J4x6OirDdMrygkD5vIzxyrfDI8aWc%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > > > I think If we want to change it we need to discuss in > list > > how we > > > want > > > > > it now > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. > > > > > To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use > the > > > > > URL above to go to the specific comment. > > > > > > > > > > For queries about this service, please contact > Infrastructure at: > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With regards, > > > > > Apache Git Services > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Carlos Rovira > > > > > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C3069e9eec31c4fc643fd08d7526e02de%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637068504849952441&sdata=lSw72rs2eai5YLdYdlkNczbbOARD8OrWrvHh5WVCAfA%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Andrew Wetmore > > > > > > > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcottage14.blogspot.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C3069e9eec31c4fc643fd08d7526e02de%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637068504849952441&sdata=kbtpYHjg2iy8yLowfz0EGQ7qWv3e5%2BWt7cLn7qGw5cs%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Carlos Rovira > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C3069e9eec31c4fc643fd08d7526e02de%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637068504849952441&sdata=lSw72rs2eai5YLdYdlkNczbbOARD8OrWrvHh5WVCAfA%3D&reserved=0 > > > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
