Hi Chris, unless this is against some Apache rules the vote thread state this:
"This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called. The vote passes if there is: - At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC - More positive votes than negative votes" So this seems ok, right? Thanks Carlos El mié., 15 abr. 2020 a las 10:47, Yishay Weiss (<[email protected]>) escribió: > Hi Chris, > > I may have made a mistake here, but I thought it was ok since we had > enough +1 votes. As I understood it, that’s a sufficient condition. Trying > to speed things up, but my apologies if this somehow compromises Apache > rules. > > Thanks, > Yishay > > From: Christofer Dutz<mailto:[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2020 11:31 AM > To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 1.2.0 > > Royale not sticking to the typical 72 hour voting timeframe? > > Chris > > Am 15.04.20, 10:29 schrieb "Carlos Rovira" <[email protected]>: > > Hi Yishay, > > build tools and jburg was never released on its own before. Always was > part > of the global royale release. This is the first time we do this. > > Thanks > > El mié., 15 abr. 2020 a las 10:21, Yishay Weiss (< > [email protected]>) > escribió: > > > I’ve just noticed the subject should be changed to > > > > [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0. Looks > like a > > bug in CI step 6. > > > > Anyway, the vote has passed. I haven’t seen previous announcements on > > compiler build tools. Has this been done in the past? Can anyone > point me > > to an example? > > > > Thanks. > > > > From: Greg Dove<mailto:[email protected]> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2020 9:27 PM > > To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 1.2.0 > > > > fyi I can't get to this until my current EOD, about 12 hours from > now. I > > will remind myself what I need to do and check it then and vote, if > the > > voting is still open (I understand it may not be, as I think the > threshold > > was already passed). > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 6:03 AM Carlos Rovira < > [email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Remember that we have Maven Wrapper [1] in our repo so if you > don't have > > > maven installed you can just use "mvnw" (Mac) or "mvnw.cmd" (Win) > and > > that > > > will install maven for you :) > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/takari/maven-wrapper > > > > > > El mar., 14 abr. 2020 a las 18:05, Josh Tynjala (< > > > [email protected]>) > > > escribió: > > > > > > > If you're on Windows, and you happened to install Maven using the > > > > Chocolatey package manager, you may need to tweak the > > > ApproveBuildTools.xml > > > > file to get it to work. > > > > > > > > Find this line: > > > > > > > > <condition property="mvn" value="mvn.cmd"> > > > > > > > > And change it to this: > > > > > > > > <condition property="mvn" value="mvn.exe"> > > > > > > > > I think that most people will be fine, but I just wanted to > mention it. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Josh Tynjala > > > > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 1:33 PM <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > This is the discussion thread. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Yishay Weiss > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Carlos Rovira > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > > > > > > > -- > Carlos Rovira > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
