Hi Chris, and Justin, thanks for the pointers :)
Carlos El mié., 15 abr. 2020 a las 11:46, Yishay Weiss (<[email protected]>) escribió: > Hi Chris, > > > > Greg did vote before I announced the result. Anyway, for good measure, > let’s wait another 36 hours and see if anyone has objections to the result. > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > *From:* Christofer Dutz <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 15, 2020 12:26:50 PM > *To:* [email protected] <[email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 1.2.0 > > > > Hi all, > > Well theoretically for example Greg - who noted he'll be able to do a > review soon - could theoretically do the review and find something you > folks didn't. > So I would suggest to keep the vote open for the 72 hours ... especially > as you announced the votes to stay open for 72 hours. > > Was just jumping in from the side-lines, just in case you just overlooked > this. > > Chris > > > Am 15.04.20, 11:02 schrieb "Carlos Rovira" <[email protected]>: > > Hi Chris, > > unless this is against some Apache rules the vote thread state this: > > "This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called. > > The vote passes if there is: > - At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC > - More positive votes than negative votes" > > So this seems ok, right? > > Thanks > > Carlos > > > El mié., 15 abr. 2020 a las 10:47, Yishay Weiss (< > [email protected]>) > escribió: > > > Hi Chris, > > > > I may have made a mistake here, but I thought it was ok since we had > > enough +1 votes. As I understood it, that’s a sufficient condition. > Trying > > to speed things up, but my apologies if this somehow compromises > Apache > > rules. > > > > Thanks, > > Yishay > > > > From: Christofer Dutz<mailto:[email protected] > <[email protected]>> > > Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2020 11:31 AM > > To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 1.2.0 > > > > Royale not sticking to the typical 72 hour voting timeframe? > > > > Chris > > > > Am 15.04.20, 10:29 schrieb "Carlos Rovira" <[email protected] > >: > > > > Hi Yishay, > > > > build tools and jburg was never released on its own before. > Always was > > part > > of the global royale release. This is the first time we do this. > > > > Thanks > > > > El mié., 15 abr. 2020 a las 10:21, Yishay Weiss (< > > [email protected]>) > > escribió: > > > > > I’ve just noticed the subject should be changed to > > > > > > [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0. > Looks > > like a > > > bug in CI step 6. > > > > > > Anyway, the vote has passed. I haven’t seen previous > announcements on > > > compiler build tools. Has this been done in the past? Can > anyone > > point me > > > to an example? > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > From: Greg Dove<mailto:[email protected] > <[email protected]>> > > > Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2020 9:27 PM > > > To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:[email protected] > <[email protected]>> > > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 1.2.0 > > > > > > fyi I can't get to this until my current EOD, about 12 hours > from > > now. I > > > will remind myself what I need to do and check it then and > vote, if > > the > > > voting is still open (I understand it may not be, as I think > the > > threshold > > > was already passed). > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 6:03 AM Carlos Rovira < > > [email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Remember that we have Maven Wrapper [1] in our repo so if you > > don't have > > > > maven installed you can just use "mvnw" (Mac) or "mvnw.cmd" > (Win) > > and > > > that > > > > will install maven for you :) > > > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/takari/maven-wrapper > > > > > > > > El mar., 14 abr. 2020 a las 18:05, Josh Tynjala (< > > > > [email protected]>) > > > > escribió: > > > > > > > > > If you're on Windows, and you happened to install Maven > using the > > > > > Chocolatey package manager, you may need to tweak the > > > > ApproveBuildTools.xml > > > > > file to get it to work. > > > > > > > > > > Find this line: > > > > > > > > > > <condition property="mvn" value="mvn.cmd"> > > > > > > > > > > And change it to this: > > > > > > > > > > <condition property="mvn" value="mvn.exe"> > > > > > > > > > > I think that most people will be fine, but I just wanted to > > mention it. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Josh Tynjala > > > > > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 1:33 PM <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > This is the discussion thread. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Yishay Weiss > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Carlos Rovira > > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Carlos Rovira > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > > > > > > -- > Carlos Rovira > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > *From: *Christofer Dutz <[email protected]> > *Sent: *Wednesday, April 15, 2020 12:34 PM > *Subject: *Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 1.2.0 > > > > Hi all, > > Well theoretically for example Greg - who noted he'll be able to do a > review soon - could theoretically do the review and find something you > folks didn't. > So I would suggest to keep the vote open for the 72 hours ... especially > as you announced the votes to stay open for 72 hours. > > Was just jumping in from the side-lines, just in case you just overlooked > this. > > Chris > > > Am 15.04.20, 11:02 schrieb "Carlos Rovira" <[email protected]>: > > Hi Chris, > > unless this is against some Apache rules the vote thread state this: > > "This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called. > > The vote passes if there is: > - At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC > - More positive votes than negative votes" > > So this seems ok, right? > > Thanks > > Carlos > > > El mié., 15 abr. 2020 a las 10:47, Yishay Weiss (< > [email protected]>) > escribió: > > > Hi Chris, > > > > I may have made a mistake here, but I thought it was ok since we had > > enough +1 votes. As I understood it, that’s a sufficient condition. > Trying > > to speed things up, but my apologies if this somehow compromises > Apache > > rules. > > > > Thanks, > > Yishay > > > > From: Christofer Dutz<mailto:[email protected] > <[email protected]>> > > Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2020 11:31 AM > > To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 1.2.0 > > > > Royale not sticking to the typical 72 hour voting timeframe? > > > > Chris > > > > Am 15.04.20, 10:29 schrieb "Carlos Rovira" <[email protected] > >: > > > > Hi Yishay, > > > > build tools and jburg was never released on its own before. > Always was > > part > > of the global royale release. This is the first time we do this. > > > > Thanks > > > > El mié., 15 abr. 2020 a las 10:21, Yishay Weiss (< > > [email protected]>) > > escribió: > > > > > I’ve just noticed the subject should be changed to > > > > > > [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0. > Looks > > like a > > > bug in CI step 6. > > > > > > Anyway, the vote has passed. I haven’t seen previous > announcements on > > > compiler build tools. Has this been done in the past? Can > anyone > > point me > > > to an example? > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > From: Greg Dove<mailto:[email protected] > <[email protected]>> > > > Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2020 9:27 PM > > > To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:[email protected] > <[email protected]>> > > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 1.2.0 > > > > > > fyi I can't get to this until my current EOD, about 12 hours > from > > now. I > > > will remind myself what I need to do and check it then and > vote, if > > the > > > voting is still open (I understand it may not be, as I think > the > > threshold > > > was already passed). > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 6:03 AM Carlos Rovira < > > [email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Remember that we have Maven Wrapper [1] in our repo so if you > > don't have > > > > maven installed you can just use "mvnw" (Mac) or "mvnw.cmd" > (Win) > > and > > > that > > > > will install maven for you :) > > > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/takari/maven-wrapper > > > > > > > > El mar., 14 abr. 2020 a las 18:05, Josh Tynjala (< > > > > [email protected]>) > > > > escribió: > > > > > > > > > If you're on Windows, and you happened to install Maven > using the > > > > > Chocolatey package manager, you may need to tweak the > > > > ApproveBuildTools.xml > > > > > file to get it to work. > > > > > > > > > > Find this line: > > > > > > > > > > <condition property="mvn" value="mvn.cmd"> > > > > > > > > > > And change it to this: > > > > > > > > > > <condition property="mvn" value="mvn.exe"> > > > > > > > > > > I think that most people will be fine, but I just wanted to > > mention it. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Josh Tynjala > > > > > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 1:33 PM <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > This is the discussion thread. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Yishay Weiss > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Carlos Rovira > > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Carlos Rovira > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > > > > > > -- > Carlos Rovira > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
