Did you reboot your VM? Also, have you checked what user is running Jenkins on your VM? I think that can sometimes be a problem. I might be running Jenkins as the user.
-Alex On 4/19/20, 10:01 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <[email protected]> wrote: On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 9:55 PM Alex Harui <[email protected]> wrote: > Should be here: > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci2.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%3A8080%2FconfigureTools%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce57b89ef99cd486fd83508d7e4e7e84d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229557003118752&sdata=YJq3Ac1xpVWwyQDyFRgYmlcrGXs10W04hhON5QE0%2B90%3D&reserved=0 My git is located in the same exact location as master. Moreover, the git call from the commandline executes fine. The git call from ant exec is what is failing. > > > HTH, > -Alex > > From: OmPrakash Muppirala <[email protected]> > Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Date: Sunday, April 19, 2020 at 9:37 PM > To: Apache Royale Development <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Prioritize Release Jobs on CI > > I'm a bit stumped here. The royale-compiler is failing with this error: > > > BUILD FAILED > > c:\jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\jenkins.xml:55: Execute failed: > java.io.IOException: Cannot run program "git" (in directory > "c:\jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler"): CreateProcess error=2, The system > cannot find the file specified > > at java.lang.ProcessBuilder.start(Unknown Source) > > > It is from this part of the jenkins.xml: > > > <target name="closure-lib-download" description="Copies Closure > Library from GitHub"> > <echo message="Be patient. This takes a few minutes..." /> > <exec executable="git" failifexecutionfails="true"> > <arg value="clone" /> > <arg value="https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fgoogle%2Fclosure-library&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce57b89ef99cd486fd83508d7e4e7e84d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229557003118752&sdata=9fgEZdqrtoj75jvA8i0Yi%2FZj6X2rjgIkuShBpIv4Z1I%3D&reserved=0< > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fgoogle%2Fclosure-library&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce57b89ef99cd486fd83508d7e4e7e84d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229557003118752&sdata=9fgEZdqrtoj75jvA8i0Yi%2FZj6X2rjgIkuShBpIv4Z1I%3D&reserved=0>" > /> > <arg value="${closure.root}" /> > </exec> > <echo>Cloned fresh copy of Google Closure Library</echo> > </target> > > I am not sure how this executable call works without the full path. > > I checked the env variables, I do have both the git/bin and git/cmd > directory in the PATH: > > [cid:ii_k97zkk9o0] > > What am I missing? > > Thanks, > Om > > On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 11:54 PM OmPrakash Muppirala <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Update - I have successfully attached my VM as a slave agent of our > Jenkins instance. > I am going to pull the job - /royale-asjs_jsonly and tie it to my agent so > I can test it. > > It will fail for a sometime while I go set up my VM with all the > dependencies. > > Once we have the job successfully building on my VM, we can figure out how > to divide the load between the master and agent. > > Thanks, > Om > > On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 8:59 AM OmPrakash Muppirala <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > We could achieve the same by creating a new agent (separate vm) and > attaching it as a slave to the current Jenkins server. > > Then we can use labels/tags to tie release jobs to one agent and non > release jobs to another agent. > > That way we can maintain everything in one UI, one login while achieving > the concurrent building capabilities we want. > > Jenkins is built for this kind of stuff and I think it would be best we > followed this practice. > > Thanks, > Om > On Sat, Apr 18, 2020, 8:18 AM Alex Harui <[email protected]> wrote: > Om, I thought you were going to get the image from my VM and run it on > another VM. Then we'd remove all non-release jobs from your VM and all of > the release jobs from my VM. That won't solve the problem of how long it > takes for a commit to be built and tested, but will allow the RM to get a > release out without getting stuck behind the commit jobs. Is that > currently the plan? > > -Alex > > On 4/18/20, 12:43 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <[email protected]<mailto: > [email protected]>> wrote: > > Makes sense to me. I will set parallel executors back to 1. > > And start working on a new Jenkins instance. > > Thanks, > Om > > > On Sat, Apr 18, 2020, 12:28 AM Alex Harui <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Are you saying that Java, Ant and Maven do not know how to > distribute work > > to different cores? > > > > To repeat my main concern: our Jenkins jobs often use shared > resources. > > If you want to take the time to fix that, feel free, but I do not > know how > > you are going to keep two jobs from both trying to launch Flash > Player > > Debugger at the same time and open the same socket to communicate > with it, > > or try to parse the flashlog.txt that they have both written to. > > > > The royale-asjs job will use the royale-compiler workspace to get the > > compiler. If the compiler is building, the jars are not there and > the > > royale-asjs build fails. > > > > There is also only so much memory and some of our jobs use all of it > and > > I'm not sure if jobs slowed down due to paging memory and > writing/reading > > from disk, even if it is an SSD. > > > > I'm done for tonight, but that's what I was seeing last time I tried > to > > have both master and an agent running jobs in parallel. > > > > Thanks, > > -Alex > > > > On 4/17/20, 11:52 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > A typical setup would be to have 0 executors on master and at > least n > > number of executors on each agent, where n = number of cpu cores. > > I see that the current VM has 2 cores. So, I started with > setting the > > num > > executors on the current agent to 2. > > > > This should improve things quite a bit. If this doesn't work, I > will > > create a new VM and make it the slave agent of the current > Jenkins > > master. > > > > > > Thanks, > > Om > > > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 11:31 PM Alex Harui > <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > On your VM or mine? I don't think mine can handle it. I used > to > > run jobs > > > of master and agent and we got lots of failures and jobs took > > forever. If > > > two jobs are trying to run tests with the shared Flash Player > > Debugger, for > > > example, you won't get consistent results. > > > > > > -Alex > > > > > > On 4/17/20, 11:23 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" < > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > > wrote: > > > > > > I just realized that we have only one Agent (node) listed > under > > > Jenkins. I > > > am going to add at least one more node to start with. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Om > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 9:58 AM Alex Harui > > <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > I think I followed the instructions and enabled SSH. > > > > > > > > On 4/16/20, 9:37 AM, "Yishay Weiss" < > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > I haven’t gotten it to work. Could be ssh needs to be > > enabled on > > > the > > > > VM [1]. This is nice to have but not essential. So Alex, > let > > me know > > > if you > > > > want to try that, otherwise I’ll suspend my efforts on > this. > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmedium.com%2Ftechinpieces%2Fpractical-azure-how-to-enable-ssh-on-azure-vm-84d8fba8103e&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce57b89ef99cd486fd83508d7e4e7e84d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229557003118752&sdata=hB66ZhyhDqOPTp0PTxtPV4kzE2iI3TG9ERJCjkCwSaI%3D&reserved=0 > < > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmedium.com%2Ftechinpieces%2Fpractical-azure-how-to-enable-ssh-on-azure-vm-84d8fba8103e&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce57b89ef99cd486fd83508d7e4e7e84d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229557003118752&sdata=hB66ZhyhDqOPTp0PTxtPV4kzE2iI3TG9ERJCjkCwSaI%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > > > From: Yishay Weiss<mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2020 5:09 PM > > > > To: [email protected]<mailto: > [email protected]><mailto:[email protected]<mailto: > [email protected]>> > > > > Subject: RE: Prioritize Release Jobs on CI > > > > > > > > I’d like to try and install an ssh server. Can anyone > > think of a > > > > reason not to do that? I’m asking in terms of security, > and if > > there > > > might > > > > be a problem because it’s a VM. > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > From: Yishay Weiss<mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > > > Sent: Monday, April 13, 2020 10:02 AM > > > > To: [email protected]<mailto: > [email protected]><mailto:[email protected]<mailto: > [email protected]>> > > > > Subject: RE: Prioritize Release Jobs on CI > > > > > > > > Related, as most (all?) of the instructions don’t > require > > > anything but > > > > a shell wouldn’t it be easier and faster to access the > machine > > with > > > ssh > > > > [1], rather than using remote desktop? > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fwindows-server%2Fadministration%2Fopenssh%2Fopenssh_install_firstuse&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce57b89ef99cd486fd83508d7e4e7e84d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229557003118752&sdata=eaL4SoRKuYDqpNaeLvhnQPiYfTULGYD0JEhBK2mm4a4%3D&reserved=0 > < > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fwindows-server%2Fadministration%2Fopenssh%2Fopenssh_install_firstuse&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce57b89ef99cd486fd83508d7e4e7e84d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229557003128743&sdata=pkKsiZJqksZGMRqgam8yWQU5q4XB78QVI2hFuJj4hbI%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > > > From: Yishay Weiss<mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > > > Sent: Monday, April 13, 2020 9:55 AM > > > > To: [email protected]<mailto: > [email protected]><mailto:[email protected]<mailto: > [email protected]>> > > > > Subject: RE: Prioritize Release Jobs on CI > > > > > > > > Can’t you do that with remote desktop? > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > From: OmPrakash Muppirala <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > > > Sent: Monday, April 13, 2020 9:51:25 AM > > > > To: Apache Royale Development <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > > > Subject: Re: Prioritize Release Jobs on CI > > > > > > > > Alex, > > > > > > > > I believe this is your personal Azure subscription > right? > > Any > > > chance > > > > I can > > > > get access to it so I can try to copy the image out > the > > machine > > > and > > > > redeploy it somewhere else? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Om > > > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 6:18 PM OmPrakash Muppirala < > > > > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > I can help set this up on Azure. Give me some > time to > > work > > > out the > > > > > details? > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Om > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 12, 2020, 11:49 AM Harbs < > > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> OK. Good to know. > > > > >> > > > > >> > On Apr 12, 2020, at 9:45 PM, Alex Harui > > > <[email protected] > > > > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > >> > > > > > >> > FWIW, I just looked and the longest job in the > release > > > steps so > > > > far is > > > > >> 8 minutes. Most are under 2 minutes. There > might be > > jobs > > > later > > > > that take > > > > >> longer that we haven't run yet. IMO, the issue > isn't > > speed > > > of the > > > > machine, > > > > >> it is just that we are sharing the machine with > longer > > jobs > > > (1 hour > > > > for > > > > >> TourDeFlexMigration). And again, the machine > will be > > idle for > > > > stretches of > > > > >> time while the RM verifies artifacts after each > step. > > > > >> > > > > > >> > -Alex > > > > >> > > > > > >> > On 4/12/20, 11:32 AM, "Harbs" < > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > > > <mailto: > > > > >> [email protected]<mailto: > [email protected]>>> wrote: > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Fair enough. > > > > >> > > > > > >> > I expect builds to be somewhere between 10 > and 20 > > times > > > faster > > > > on a > > > > >> powerful machine. > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Yeah. It’s probably going to be a bit of work > > changing > > > the > > > > server, > > > > >> but probably worth it in the long run. > > > > >> > > > > > >> > I think I’ll try this when I do the next > release > > unless > > > Yishay > > > > wants > > > > >> to work with me on this for this release — but > I’m not > > going > > > to be > > > > able to > > > > >> help until after Passover (i.e. next week). > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Thanks, > > > > >> > Harbs > > > > >> > > > > > >> >> On Apr 12, 2020, at 9:22 PM, Alex Harui > > > <[email protected] > > > > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> The Azure portal says: Standard F2s_v2 (2 > vcpus, 4 > > GiB > > > memory) > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> I think I am reading changes to the build > process in > > your > > > > >> suggestions. I do not really want to spend more > of my > > time > > > on this > > > > >> process. But if you want to do the work, that's > fine > > with me. > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> -Alex > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> On 4/12/20, 10:57 AM, "Harbs" < > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > > > <mailto: > > > > >> [email protected]<mailto: > [email protected]>> <mailto:[email protected]<mailto: > [email protected]> > > <mailto: > > > > >> [email protected]<mailto: > [email protected]>>>> wrote: > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> What kind of horsepower is included in the > free > > Azure > > > account? > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> The server I mentioned builds (considerably) > > faster than > > > my own > > > > >> local machine. The ci server seems to build many > times > > slower. > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> One thing we can do to minimize running > server time > > > would be to > > > > >> transfer the artifacts to storage instead of > keeping > > them on > > > the > > > > server. On > > > > >> AWS, I’d probably use S3. Not sure what the > similar > > service on > > > > Azure is > > > > >> called. > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >>> On Apr 12, 2020, at 8:26 PM, Alex Harui > > > > <[email protected] > > > > >> <mailto:[email protected]<mailto: > [email protected]>>> wrote: > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> OK, that's pretty much how I understand Azure > as > > well. > > > The key > > > > thing > > > > >> is that "running" includes time where the CI > server is > > not > > > running > > > > any > > > > >> Jenkins jobs. The CI Server steps might take > only a few > > > hours of > > > > actual > > > > >> server time, but there is time where the RM is > verifying > > > artifacts > > > > locally > > > > >> so you'd be paying for that or the RM would have > to keep > > > shutting > > > > down and > > > > >> restarting. > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> Seems like it would be cheaper/simpler to get > the > > free > > > MSDN > > > > account > > > > >> and leave it running. > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> -Alex > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> On 4/12/20, 10:15 AM, "Harbs" < > > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > > > <mailto: > > > > >> [email protected]<mailto: > [email protected]>>> wrote: > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> My experience is with AWS. > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> I assume Microsoft has similar offerings, > but I > > don’t > > > have > > > > >> experience with Azure. > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> AWS has on-demand EC2 instances which you > pay for > > only > > > the > > > > actual > > > > >> time that they are running.[1] > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> Instances can be started and stopped via > command > > line > > > (or via > > > > the > > > > >> web interface) as long as you have valid > credentials to > > do so. > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> For example: an m5.4xlarge instance has 16 > cores > > and > > > costs > > > > about > > > > >> $1.5 per hour. On a machine like that, a full > build > > would > > > probably > > > > take > > > > >> less than 10 minutes. It’s probably possible to > do a > > full > > > release > > > > with only > > > > >> a few hours of server time. > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> Leaving a server like that running all the > time > > would get > > > > expensive, > > > > >> but if it’s just spun up for releases, you’d get > very > > fast > > > builds > > > > at a > > > > >> reasonable price. > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> I’d be happy to pay $10-$50 (and possibly > more) per > > > release to > > > > make > > > > >> the release process painless for the RM. > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> [1] > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce57b89ef99cd486fd83508d7e4e7e84d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229557003128743&sdata=iT0SjMYkQ7EQY7jG2fwkz%2Bjh%2FWTSXdnzALBAeyooXz0%3D&reserved=0 > < > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce57b89ef99cd486fd83508d7e4e7e84d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229557003128743&sdata=iT0SjMYkQ7EQY7jG2fwkz%2Bjh%2FWTSXdnzALBAeyooXz0%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > >> < > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce57b89ef99cd486fd83508d7e4e7e84d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229557003128743&sdata=iT0SjMYkQ7EQY7jG2fwkz%2Bjh%2FWTSXdnzALBAeyooXz0%3D&reserved=0 > < > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce57b89ef99cd486fd83508d7e4e7e84d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229557003128743&sdata=iT0SjMYkQ7EQY7jG2fwkz%2Bjh%2FWTSXdnzALBAeyooXz0%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > >> >< > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce57b89ef99cd486fd83508d7e4e7e84d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229557003128743&sdata=iT0SjMYkQ7EQY7jG2fwkz%2Bjh%2FWTSXdnzALBAeyooXz0%3D&reserved=0 > < > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce57b89ef99cd486fd83508d7e4e7e84d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229557003128743&sdata=iT0SjMYkQ7EQY7jG2fwkz%2Bjh%2FWTSXdnzALBAeyooXz0%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > >> < > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce57b89ef99cd486fd83508d7e4e7e84d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229557003128743&sdata=iT0SjMYkQ7EQY7jG2fwkz%2Bjh%2FWTSXdnzALBAeyooXz0%3D&reserved=0 > < > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce57b89ef99cd486fd83508d7e4e7e84d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229557003128743&sdata=iT0SjMYkQ7EQY7jG2fwkz%2Bjh%2FWTSXdnzALBAeyooXz0%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > >> >>< > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce57b89ef99cd486fd83508d7e4e7e84d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229557003138737&sdata=lYoWGyhdvlZ4Z0Qgoap%2FgDxOwlHgEtu6r9gwxVCSfg4%3D&reserved=0 > < > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce57b89ef99cd486fd83508d7e4e7e84d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229557003138737&sdata=lYoWGyhdvlZ4Z0Qgoap%2FgDxOwlHgEtu6r9gwxVCSfg4%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > >> < > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce57b89ef99cd486fd83508d7e4e7e84d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229557003138737&sdata=lYoWGyhdvlZ4Z0Qgoap%2FgDxOwlHgEtu6r9gwxVCSfg4%3D&reserved=0 > < > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce57b89ef99cd486fd83508d7e4e7e84d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229557003138737&sdata=lYoWGyhdvlZ4Z0Qgoap%2FgDxOwlHgEtu6r9gwxVCSfg4%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > >> >< > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce57b89ef99cd486fd83508d7e4e7e84d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229557003138737&sdata=lYoWGyhdvlZ4Z0Qgoap%2FgDxOwlHgEtu6r9gwxVCSfg4%3D&reserved=0 > < > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce57b89ef99cd486fd83508d7e4e7e84d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229557003138737&sdata=lYoWGyhdvlZ4Z0Qgoap%2FgDxOwlHgEtu6r9gwxVCSfg4%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > >> < > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce57b89ef99cd486fd83508d7e4e7e84d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229557003138737&sdata=lYoWGyhdvlZ4Z0Qgoap%2FgDxOwlHgEtu6r9gwxVCSfg4%3D&reserved=0 > < > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce57b89ef99cd486fd83508d7e4e7e84d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229557003138737&sdata=lYoWGyhdvlZ4Z0Qgoap%2FgDxOwlHgEtu6r9gwxVCSfg4%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>>> On Apr 12, 2020, at 7:45 PM, Alex Harui > > > > <[email protected]> > > > > >> wrote: > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >> >>>> I'm not very experienced with spinning up > > servers. The > > > CI > > > > server we > > > > >> are using is effectively free, based on a generous > > donation > > > from > > > > Microsoft > > > > >> of MSDN accounts to ASF committers. So I leave > it up > > 24/7, > > > and > > > > share the > > > > >> RDP access on private@. I think any other ASF > > committer > > > could do > > > > the > > > > >> same. IIRC, if that server actually is stopped, > I have > > to > > > use my > > > > personal > > > > >> (unshared) MSDN credentials to start it again. > AIUI, > > if I > > > > actually paid > > > > >> for the server, it would cost me to leave it > running > > even if > > > it > > > > didn't run > > > > >> jobs between releases. > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >> >>>> Is that what you are basically saying? I > think it > > might > > > be > > > > best if > > > > >> another committer got a CI server going via the MS > > donation > > > and > > > > could leave > > > > >> it up 24/7. > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >> >>>> -Alex > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >> >>>> On 4/12/20, 9:28 AM, "Harbs" < > > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > > > wrote: > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >> >>>> I’m willing to do this. > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >> >>>> Considering that the release will be run > > infrequently, it > > > > should be > > > > >> doable to have a relatively powerful server that > could > > be > > > spun up on > > > > >> demand. This is something I have setup for my own > > releases. > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >> >>>> The only complication would be that each RM > would > > need > > > valid > > > > >> credentials to spin up the server. > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >> >>>> Harbs > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >> >>>>> On Apr 12, 2020, at 7:10 PM, Alex Harui > > > > <[email protected]> > > > > >> wrote: > > > > >> >>>>> > > > > >> >>>>> A better solution, IMO, is for someone else > to > > offer up > > > a CI > > > > server > > > > >> only for release jobs. > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
