I'm sorry Harbs. I've seen that but I didn't connect it with Moonshine at
that moment. :(

Thank you!

On Tue, Jun 16, 2020, 6:06 PM Harbs <[email protected]> wrote:

> We discussed the version number and I already suggested that we change the
> number before release. No one objected before. That’s why I made the change.
>
> I reverted my commit fo now, so it should be back to 0.9.8 as soon as the
> next build completes. FWIW, the version number has always been changed in
> the develop branch immediately after release.
>
> I’m planning on discussing with Yishay and/or Alex starting the release
> soon. Not sure the implications of changing the version in the release
> branch vs. develop.
>
> > On Jun 16, 2020, at 5:42 PM, Piotr Zarzycki <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Harbs,
> >
> > You can use whatever you want number of version for release, but change
> it
> > once you release stuff not earlier - that's my point. It is not the
> problem
> > have 0.10.0 version of Royale for upcoming release at all.
> >
> > We are using hard coded url along with hard coded version in order to
> > download Nightly build of Royale. Now you have changed it so 0.9.8 is not
> > available obviously - our logic is failing and user is not able to
> download
> > Royale.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Piotr
> >
> > wt., 16 cze 2020 o 16:37 Harbs <[email protected]> napisał(a):
> >
> >> We can revert the bump, but I’m not sure it’s a great idea to set the
> >> version in the release branch. It seems to me that the develop branch
> >> should match the next release.
> >>
> >> If a version number of 0.10.0 breaks Moonshine, I think we should use
> >> 0.9.8 for the next release.
> >>
> >> Although I’m not sure I understand why 0.10.0 breaks Moonshine.
> >>
> >>> On Jun 16, 2020, at 5:29 PM, Andrew Wetmore <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I support Piotr in this. We need to apply the number bump closer to
> when
> >>> the release will be available, rather than disrupting a very useful
> >> partner
> >>> application and its user community.
> >>>
> >>> a
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 11:10 AM Piotr Zarzycki <
> >> [email protected]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi Chris,
> >>>>
> >>>> You are right and I have mentioned in my previous email that we are
> >>>> planning to fix that - it's going to happen probably in couple of
> >> weeks. It
> >>>> was not clear to you from the previous email ?
> >>>>
> >>>> I have asked Harbs for revert, cause I feel like it shouldn't be
> >> increased
> >>>> yet. Before he started to release it may have been days or weeks,
> cause
> >> non
> >>>> of us is obligated to hold any kind of schedule towards the project.
> It
> >>>> ends up that our tool won't work during all of that time.
> >>>>
> >>>> Let's wait for some words from Harbs.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Piotr
> >>>>
> >>>> wt., 16 cze 2020 o 16:03 Christofer Dutz <[email protected]>
> >>>> napisał(a):
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi all,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> just my few cents from the side-lines ...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> if the version bump from a release breaks something for an external
> >> tool,
> >>>>> I would probably consider that a problem with the tool, correct?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Shouldn't the situation where a new version is being released sort of
> >> be
> >>>> a
> >>>>> situation a tool can explicitly live with and the users shouldn't
> have
> >> to
> >>>>> wait for this version to be explicitly supported?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I so I would assume, if it downloads a nightly, it should probably
> >> check
> >>>>> the version and automatically use that.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> And after all Harbs did mention his plans to re-release pretty soon.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Perhaps an increased release speed is even something that will help
> >>>>> improve the overall tooling.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Chris
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Am 16.06.20, 12:58 schrieb "Piotr Zarzycki" <
> >> [email protected]
> >>>>> :
> >>>>>
> >>>>>   Hi Harbs,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>   I think your changes in develop version to 0.10.0 is a bit
> >> premature.
> >>>>>   Shouldn't you have done this during release process ?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>   Your changes break our Moonshine SDK Installer [1] - which we have
> >>>>> released
> >>>>>   one week ago with update where user can download newest released
> and
> >>>>>   nightly build of Royale. Right now downloading nightly is not
> >>>> possible
> >>>>>   through that - it's broken.
> >>>>>   We are planning for the next version have an ability to change
> setup
> >>>>> of SDK
> >>>>>   without need of releasing whole application, but this is still not
> >>>>>   implemented - if Royale stays with that version now we will need to
> >>>>> make
> >>>>>   another release - I would like to avoid that effort.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>   Would it be possible revert changes and make them once you start
> >>>>> release
> >>>>>   process ? In fact even during release process this [2] - shouldn't
> >>>>> change
> >>>>>   till release is done.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>   [1] https://moonshine-ide.com/download/#moonshine-sdk-installer
> >>>>>   [2]
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> http://apacheroyaleci2.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs_jsonly/
> >>>>>
> >>>>>   Thanks,
> >>>>>   Piotr
> >>>>>
> >>>>>   wt., 2 cze 2020 o 19:45 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]>
> >>>>> napisał(a):
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> +1 for 0.10.0
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> El mar., 2 jun. 2020 a las 17:53, Josh Tynjala (<
> >>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>>>> )
> >>>>>> escribió:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> +1 on 0.10.0
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> Josh Tynjala
> >>>>>>> Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 5:36 AM Andrew Wetmore <
> >>>> [email protected]
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> That's why I raised it now. I formally propose that, if this
> >>>>> release
> >>>>>>>> includes new functions or features, and is not just a bug fix,
> >>>>> that we
> >>>>>>> call
> >>>>>>>> it "0.10.0", and that we follow that pattern for future
> >>>> releases.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 9:04 AM Harbs <[email protected]>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I have no preference.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> If there’s a consensus on it being 0.10.0, that’s fine with
> >>>> me,
> >>>>>>> although
> >>>>>>>>> it’ll probably be easiest if we make that change before we
> >>>>> start on
> >>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>> release.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Harbs
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Jun 2, 2020, at 12:11 PM, Andrew Wetmore <
> >>>>> [email protected]>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> As Chris mentioned, will this release be 0.10.0? That is,
> >>>>> does it
> >>>>>> add
> >>>>>>>>>> features and functions? Or is it a bug-fix release, and
> >>>>> therefore
> >>>>>>>> 0.9.8?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 5:47 AM Piotr Zarzycki <
> >>>>>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Good luck! :)
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> wt., 2 cze 2020 o 10:36 Harbs <[email protected]>
> >>>>> napisał(a):
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I intend to start on the next release early next week.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I wanted to give folks a heads-up and time before I
> >>>> start.
> >>>>> If
> >>>>>>> there’s
> >>>>>>>>>>>> anything you have on your list to get done before our
> >>>> next
> >>>>>> release,
> >>>>>>>> now
> >>>>>>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>>>> the time. :-)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Harbs
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Piotr Zarzycki
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> >>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>> Andrew Wetmore
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> Andrew Wetmore
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Carlos Rovira
> >>>>>> http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>   --
> >>>>>
> >>>>>   Piotr Zarzycki
> >>>>>
> >>>>>   Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> >>>>>   <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>>
> >>>> Piotr Zarzycki
> >>>>
> >>>> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> >>>> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Andrew Wetmore
> >>>
> >>> http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
> >>
> >>
> >
> > --
> >
> > Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>
>

Reply via email to