Even BindingUtils didn't show off, RemoteObject from mx seems to be there.
The second option is enough.
"We hopefully will separate MX in libraries and will create a "jewel" config
that adds RPC and maybe others that could be needed."
That would be great.
Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> escreveu no dia sexta, 10/07/2020
à(s) 11:20:
> I'm not an expert on asconfic, but I remember I solved it maintaining
> "royale" as config and adding this:
>
> "library-path": [
> "${royalelib}/js/libs/MXRoyaleJS.swc"
> ],
> "js-library-path": [
> "${royalelib}/js/libs/MXRoyaleJS.swc"
> ],
>
> I think maybe just the second was enough...
>
> We hopefully will separate MX in libraries and will create a "jewel" config
> that adds RPC and maybe others that could be needed.
>
> Also remember to remove mx css adding this to additional compiler options:
>
>
> -compiler.exclude-defaults-css-files=MXRoyale-${royale.framework.version}-js.swc:defaults.css;
>
>
>
> El vie., 10 jul. 2020 a las 11:23, Hugo Ferreira (<hferreira...@gmail.com
> >)
> escribió:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > That's a good idea, because I want to avoid MX UI as much as possible,
> > since I decided for Royale, so Royale it is.
> > However I don't see so many problems for non-UI stuff.
> > My issue is that to work with MX, I saw that I need to change my
> > asconfig.json from "config": "royale" to "config": "flex" (ps: I'm using
> > Visual Studio Code) and then I got all sort of namespace conflicts
> between
> > MX and Royale.For what you said, I believe that's a better way to mix MX
> > and Royale without changing so dramatically config file.
> >
> > Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> escreveu no dia sexta,
> 10/07/2020
> > à(s) 09:32:
> >
> > > Hi Hugo,
> > > you can use MXRoyale in "Royale only" (i.e: jewel) apps.
> > > You must to be careful, but code like RPC classes, validators, and
> > probably
> > > BindingUtils can be used.
> > > I think while you don't use "visual" things, that should be ok. It
> maybe
> > > would require you to try it, but at least RPC classes are working for
> > many
> > > others and I used as well some validators time ago.
> > >
> > > El vie., 10 jul. 2020 a las 0:39, Hugo Ferreira (<
> hferreira...@gmail.com
> > >)
> > > escribió:
> > >
> > > > OK.
> > > > I'm using Royale only, so BindingUtils (mx version) is not available
> in
> > > my
> > > > case.
> > > > I will try to workaround in a different way (for sure I have to write
> > > more
> > > > code) but yes, BindingUtils is a short way in a single line to do the
> > > > things (it will be a missing feature).
> > > >
> > > > Greg Dove <greg.d...@gmail.com> escreveu no dia quinta, 9/07/2020
> à(s)
> > > > 23:34:
> > > >
> > > > > When I originally wrote that, it was not intended to be used
> directly
> > > in
> > > > > code, it was intended to support the metadata-driven injected
> > bindings,
> > > > > specifically with Crux. It is quite specific for Crux.
> > > > > It does need BindableChainInfo instances in that last argument
> > instead
> > > of
> > > > > strings. Perhaps the code can be adapted to be more useful other
> than
> > > > with
> > > > > Crux, but would need some time and effort focused on that.
> > > > > Is it not viable to use injection in your case?
> > > > >
> > > > > Since I worked on that, I did also do some work in the mx.binding
> > > inside
> > > > > MXRoyale. Maybe the BindingUtils in there is more like what you
> want?
> > > (It
> > > > > is closer to the original Flex)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 10:02 AM Hugo Ferreira <
> > hferreira...@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > The following line of code, compiles without any issue:
> > > > > > BindingUtils.bindProperty(header, "minimized", content,
> > ["visible"]);
> > > > > >
> > > > > > However at runtime, I got the following error on Google Chrome
> > > Console:
> > > > > > Uncaught TypeError: Error #1034: Type Coercion failed: cannot
> > convert
> > > > > > visible to org.apache.royale.crux.binding.BindableChainInfo
> > > > > > at Function.org.apache.royale.utils.Language.as
> > > (Language.js:115)
> > > > > > at
> > > > Function.org.apache.royale.crux.binding.BindingUtils.bindProperty
> > > > > > (BindingUtils.js:73)
> > > > > > at
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> pt.solidsoft.gc.view.login.Login.pt.solidsoft.framework.form.Form.addElement
> > > > > > (Form.mxml:32)
> > > > > > at
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> Function.org.apache.royale.utils.MXMLDataInterpreter.initializeStrandBasedObject
> > > > > > (MXMLDataInterpreter.js:241)
> > > > > > at
> > > > > >
> > > Function.org.apache.royale.utils.MXMLDataInterpreter.generateMXMLArray
> > > > > > (MXMLDataInterpreter.js:127)
> > > > > > at
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> Function.org.apache.royale.utils.MXMLDataInterpreter.generateMXMLInstances
> > > > > > (MXMLDataInterpreter.js:271)
> > > > > > at
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> pt.solidsoft.gc.view.login.Login.org.apache.royale.jewel.Container.addedToParent
> > > > > > (Container.js:76)
> > > > > > at
> > > > > >
> > org.apache.royale.html.Group.org.apache.royale.core.UIBase.addElement
> > > > > > (UIBase.js:405)
> > > > > > at
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > org.apache.royale.html.Group.org.apache.royale.core.GroupBase.addElement
> > > > > > (GroupBase.js:165)
> > > > > > at
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> Function.org.apache.royale.utils.MXMLDataInterpreter.initializeStrandBasedObject
> > > > > > (MXMLDataInterpreter.js:241)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > An explanation:
> > > > > > header is the source instance of a component
> > > > > > minimized is the public Bindable property that I'm listening
> > > > > > content is the target instance of a component
> > > > > > visible is the visibility of the target that I want to depend on
> > the
> > > > > > minimized property
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Is this a bug that I should insert on github issues or I'm doing
> > > > > something
> > > > > > wrong ?
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Carlos Rovira
> > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
