On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 4:02 AM, Puja Valiyil <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Eric, > I think the graduation process would take several months. The rdf4j > upgrade is likely to be merged in prior to that. > Graduation would take only a month or two, depending on the timing of the discussion / vote threads and the scheduled board meeting. > What's the status of that pr? I know Eric white and a few other > developers were helping the original author with it, but it fell off my > radar over thanksgiving. Did we make a decision about how to support > legacy users (maintaining a 3.x branch and pulling the rdf 4j upgrade as. > 4.x change since it's a breaking change)? > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Nov 30, 2017, at 5:20 AM, Erik Bijsterbosch <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > Shouldn't code for OpenRDF be refactored to RDF4J for graduation? > > > > Regards, > > Erik > > > > 2017-11-22 23:55 GMT+01:00 Josh Elser <[email protected]>: > > > >> Hiya, > >> > >> (Disclaimer, I have not crunched any numbers yet about diversity, > traffic, > >> etc) > >> > >> I was thinking the other day that Rya is "old" enough that we should > start > >> thinking about graduation[1], and, if we don't think it's ready, let's > set > >> concrete/actionable goals which people can push towards to get the > podling > >> to graduation. > >> > >> Thoughts/Opinions? > >> > >> - Josh > >> > >> [1] https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html > >> >
