Good to know!  I assumed it was a long and involved process.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Dec 1, 2017, at 9:18 AM, Billie Rinaldi <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 4:02 AM, Puja Valiyil <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Eric,
>> I think the graduation process would take several months.  The rdf4j
>> upgrade is likely to be merged in prior to that.
>> 
> 
> Graduation would take only a month or two, depending on the timing of the
> discussion / vote threads and the scheduled board meeting.
> 
> 
>> What's the status of that pr?  I know Eric white and a few other
>> developers were helping the original author with it, but it fell off my
>> radar over thanksgiving.  Did we make a decision about how to support
>> legacy users (maintaining a 3.x branch and pulling the rdf 4j upgrade as.
>> 4.x change since it's a breaking change)?
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>> On Nov 30, 2017, at 5:20 AM, Erik Bijsterbosch <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> Shouldn't code for OpenRDF be refactored to RDF4J for graduation?
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Erik
>>> 
>>> 2017-11-22 23:55 GMT+01:00 Josh Elser <[email protected]>:
>>> 
>>>> Hiya,
>>>> 
>>>> (Disclaimer, I have not crunched any numbers yet about diversity,
>> traffic,
>>>> etc)
>>>> 
>>>> I was thinking the other day that Rya is "old" enough that we should
>> start
>>>> thinking about graduation[1], and, if we don't think it's ready, let's
>> set
>>>> concrete/actionable goals which people can push towards to get the
>> podling
>>>> to graduation.
>>>> 
>>>> Thoughts/Opinions?
>>>> 
>>>> - Josh
>>>> 
>>>> [1] https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html
>>>> 
>> 

Reply via email to