+1 for the idea. On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote:
> I suspect that not getting the report out early is a side effect of not > having a specific person assigned to generate the report. Everyone assumes > everyone else will do it. Perhaps it would help if you identified a > particular person, at the start of each period, who is responsible for the > next report? > > Patrick > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Sravya Tirukkovalur <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > My sincere apologies for not being able to put together the report much > in > > advance. I did send out the email one day prior, so that members of all > > time zones get a chance to review though, but I agree sooner would have > > been definitely better. Also I was not really sure if the concerns raised > > should be listed in the board report or they were mostly for the podling > > members to keep track, rectify and improve on it. > > > > Community has started working on the concerns raised and hoping to > resolve > > most of it soon. And I see that most of the product discussions happen on > > jira/review board, but I agree that it will be good to start discussions > > first on dev list for more community involvement. > > > > As we cannot edit the report now, I think it is fair enough to submit > > monthly reports for a bit until we resolve all the concerns raised. > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 2:57 AM, Joe Brockmeier <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2015, at 03:44 AM, David Nalley wrote: > > > > Hi folks: > > > > > > > > I apologize for a lack of engagement of late. That has caused > > > > problems. (lack of oversight on the release vote for instance) > > > > > > > > I left comments on the board report about concerns I have, and wanted > > > > to ensure that it's a conversation we continue and that it doesn't > > > > just get lost. > > > > > > > > So here are my comments - and one of the links will not work for you, > > > > but do work for the board members and IPMC members reviewing the > board > > > > report. My goal is not to beat up, or complain, but ensure that > things > > > > improve and that this projects successfully graduates. > > > > > > > > dn: Recently during the conversation around graduation, mentors have > > > > raised a number of concerns. The gravest of these is concerns > > > > around where project direction is occurring. > > > > See http://s.apache.org/sentrygraddiscussion for more detail. > > > > Additionally, it was discovered that Sentry did not follow the > > > > Incubator release process for the 1.5.0 release - though that is now > > > > being rectified on general@ - see: > > > > http://s.apache.org/sentryreleaseissue > > > > I am somewhat concerned that the report mentions neither of these > > > > things and for that reason, I am withholding signoff. > > > > > > Full agreement here. Also, I'm disappointed after the feedback I've > > > given elsewhere that -- once again -- the board report is being pulled > > > together at the last minute without the opportunity for actual > community > > > review of the report. The community should have at least 72 hours to > > > review something like this for proper discussion. > > > > > > I see an enormous disconnect between the project's report and the > > > reality. There are very serious concerns about the podling that have > > > been expressed to the project and they are not reflected here. > > > > > > > I also think it would be reasonable for the podling to report monthly > > > > for the next three months or so to report on progress dealing with > > > > these issues. > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > --David > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Sravya Tirukkovalur < > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > Thank you all for proof reading! I just posted the report to > > incubator > > > wiki. > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Gregory Chanan < > [email protected] > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> lgtm. > > > > >> > > > > >> Greg > > > > >> > > > > >> On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Lenni Kuff <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >> > +1 - lgtm, thanks for writing this up Sravya. > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Prasad Mujumdar < > > > [email protected]> > > > > >> > wrote: > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Looks fine to me. Thanks Sravya. > > > > >> > > +1 > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > thanks > > > > >> > > Prasad > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Sravya Tirukkovalur < > > > > >> > [email protected]> > > > > >> > > wrote: > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > Thank you Prasad for the feedback! Made the changes. > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Prasad Mujumdar < > > > > >> [email protected] > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > wrote: > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > Thanks Sravya for putting this together! Looks mostly > > > fine. A > > > > >> few > > > > >> > > > minor > > > > >> > > > > comments/suggestions below - > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > bq. Sentry community is getting ready for graduation. > > > > >> > > > > I am not sure if we want to mention that under "issues" > > > section. > > > > >> How > > > > >> > > > about > > > > >> > > > > adding that to community or project section ? > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > Date of last release - IMO we should wait for IPMC vote > for > > > new > > > > >> > > release. > > > > >> > > > We > > > > >> > > > > can mention the new release vote underway in the community > > > section. > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > thanks > > > > >> > > > > Prasad > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Sravya Tirukkovalur < > > > > >> > [email protected] > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > wrote: > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Hi all, > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Here is a draft of report [1]. Please let me know if you > > > have any > > > > >> > > > > > suggestions. As we need to submit this today, I will > wait > > > for > > > > >> > > another 6 > > > > >> > > > > > hours before submitting it on incubator page. If I > receive > > > > >> feedback > > > > >> > > > after > > > > >> > > > > > that I will update it directly there. > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Thanks! > > > > >> > > > > > [1]: > > > > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SENTRY/June+2015 > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > -- > > > > >> > > > Sravya Tirukkovalur > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Sravya Tirukkovalur > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > jzb > > > -- > > > Joe Brockmeier > > > [email protected] > > > Twitter: @jzb > > > http://www.dissociatedpress.net/ > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Sravya Tirukkovalur > > > -- Sravya Tirukkovalur
