dev  

Messages by Thread

• FOSDEM 2016 - take action by 4th of December 2015 Roman Shaposhnik
• Review Request 40807: SENTRY-953: External Partitions which are referenced by more than one table can cause some unexpected behavior with Sentry HDFS sync Sravya Tirukkovalur
  • Re: Review Request 40807: SENTRY-953: External Partitions which are referenced by more than one table can cause some unexpected behavior with Sentry HDFS sync Li Li
• [ANNOUNCE] New Apache Sentry Committer - Anne Yu Sravya Tirukkovalur
  • RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Apache Sentry Committer - Anne Yu Ma, Junjie
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Apache Sentry Committer - Anne Yu Lenni Kuff
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Apache Sentry Committer - Anne Yu Hao Hao
  • RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Apache Sentry Committer - Anne Yu Sun, Dapeng
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Apache Sentry Committer - Anne Yu Prasad Mujumdar
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Apache Sentry Committer - Anne Yu Li Li
• IRC channel for Sentry Sravya Tirukkovalur
  • Re: IRC channel for Sentry Sravya Tirukkovalur
  • Re: IRC channel for Sentry Susan Lauber
  • Re: IRC channel for Sentry Sravya Tirukkovalur
• [DISCUSS] Sentry maturity assessment document Sravya Tirukkovalur
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Sentry maturity assessment document Sravya Tirukkovalur
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Sentry maturity assessment document Lenni Kuff
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Sentry maturity assessment document Sravya Tirukkovalur
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Sentry maturity assessment document Lenni Kuff
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Sentry maturity assessment document Sravya Tirukkovalur
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Sentry maturity assessment document Sravya Tirukkovalur
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Sentry maturity assessment document Lenni Kuff
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Sentry maturity assessment document Sravya Tirukkovalur
• December 2015 Report Marvin Humphrey
  • Re: December 2015 Report Sravya Tirukkovalur
  • Re: December 2015 Report Prasad Mujumdar
  • Re: December 2015 Report Sravya Tirukkovalur
  • Re: December 2015 Report Arvind Prabhakar
  • Re: December 2015 Report Sravya Tirukkovalur
  • Re: December 2015 Report Arvind Prabhakar
• [ANNOUNCE] CFP open for ApacheCon North America 2016 Rich Bowen
• Sentry-jdk-1.7 - Build # 542 - Unstable Apache Jenkins Server
  • Sentry-jdk-1.7 - Build # 543 - Fixed Apache Jenkins Server
• Review Request 40677: SENTRY835: Drop table leaves a connection open when using metastorelistener. Hao Hao
  • Re: Review Request 40677: SENTRY835: Drop table leaves a connection open when using metastorelistener. Anne Yu
  • Re: Review Request 40677: SENTRY835: Drop table leaves a connection open when using metastorelistener. Hao Hao
  • Re: Review Request 40677: SENTRY835: Drop table leaves a connection open when using metastorelistener. Anne Yu
  • Re: Review Request 40677: SENTRY835: Drop table leaves a connection open when using metastorelistener. Lenni Kuff
  • Re: Review Request 40677: SENTRY835: Drop table leaves a connection open when using metastorelistener. Hao Hao
  • Re: Review Request 40677: SENTRY835: Drop table leaves a connection open when using metastorelistener. Hao Hao
  • Re: Review Request 40677: SENTRY835: Drop table leaves a connection open when using metastorelistener. Lenni Kuff
  • Re: Review Request 40677: SENTRY835: Drop table leaves a connection open when using metastorelistener. Hao Hao
  • Re: Review Request 40677: SENTRY835: Drop table leaves a connection open when using metastorelistener. Anne Yu
• Review Request 40615: SENTRY-957: Exceptions in MetastoreCacheInitializer should probably not prevent HMS from starting up. Hao Hao
  • Re: Review Request 40615: SENTRY-957: Exceptions in MetastoreCacheInitializer should probably not prevent HMS from starting up. Hao Hao
  • Re: Review Request 40615: SENTRY-957: Exceptions in MetastoreCacheInitializer should probably not prevent HMS from starting up. Anne Yu
  • Re: Review Request 40615: SENTRY-957: Exceptions in MetastoreCacheInitializer should probably not prevent HMS from starting up. Hao Hao
  • Re: Review Request 40615: SENTRY-957: Exceptions in MetastoreCacheInitializer should probably not prevent HMS from starting up. Li Li
  • Re: Review Request 40615: SENTRY-957: Exceptions in MetastoreCacheInitializer should probably not prevent HMS from starting up. Lenni Kuff
  • Re: Review Request 40615: SENTRY-957: Exceptions in MetastoreCacheInitializer should probably not prevent HMS from starting up. Hao Hao
  • Re: Review Request 40615: SENTRY-957: Exceptions in MetastoreCacheInitializer should probably not prevent HMS from starting up. Lenni Kuff
  • Re: Review Request 40615: SENTRY-957: Exceptions in MetastoreCacheInitializer should probably not prevent HMS from starting up. Anne Yu
• Review Request 40465: SENTRY-965: Solr /terms request handler broken because of components declaration Gregory Chanan
  • Re: Review Request 40465: SENTRY-965: Solr /terms request handler broken because of components declaration Vamsee Yarlagadda
• Support for multiple versions of a binding? Gregory Chanan
  • RE: Support for multiple versions of a binding? Sun, Dapeng
  • Re: Support for multiple versions of a binding? Gregory Chanan
  • Re: Support for multiple versions of a binding? Lenni Kuff
• Sentry-jdk-1.7 - Build # 539 - Unstable Apache Jenkins Server
  • Sentry-jdk-1.7 - Build # 540 - Fixed Apache Jenkins Server
• Review Request 40408: Add concurrent jdbc and thrift client tests to ensure synchronization works fine Anne Yu
  • Re: Review Request 40408: Add concurrent jdbc and thrift client tests to ensure synchronization works fine Hao Hao
  • Re: Review Request 40408: Add concurrent jdbc and thrift client tests to ensure synchronization works fine Anne Yu
  • Re: Review Request 40408: Add concurrent jdbc and thrift client tests to ensure synchronization works fine Li Li
  • Re: Review Request 40408: Add concurrent jdbc and thrift client tests to ensure synchronization works fine Anne Yu
  • Re: Review Request 40408: Add concurrent jdbc and thrift client tests to ensure synchronization works fine Li Li
  • Re: Review Request 40408: Add concurrent jdbc and thrift client tests to ensure synchronization works fine Anne Yu
  • Re: Review Request 40408: Add concurrent jdbc and thrift client tests to ensure synchronization works fine Anne Yu
  • Re: Review Request 40408: Add concurrent jdbc and thrift client tests to ensure synchronization works fine Hao Hao
• [DISCUSS] Follow up from general@ thread Sravya Tirukkovalur
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Follow up from general@ thread Lenni Kuff
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Follow up from general@ thread Arvind Prabhakar
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Follow up from general@ thread Sravya Tirukkovalur
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Follow up from general@ thread Patrick Hunt
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Follow up from general@ thread Lenni Kuff
• Review Request 40316: Restore whitelist validation functionality to Sentry Ryan Pridgeon
  • Re: Review Request 40316: Restore whitelist validation functionality to Sentry Lenni Kuff
  • Re: Review Request 40316: Restore whitelist validation functionality to Sentry Hao Hao
  • Re: Review Request 40316: Restore whitelist validation functionality to Sentry Ryan Pridgeon
  • Re: Review Request 40316: Restore whitelist validation functionality to Sentry Ryan Pridgeon
  • Re: Review Request 40316: Restore whitelist validation functionality to Sentry Hao Hao
  • Re: Review Request 40316: Restore whitelist validation functionality to Sentry Sravya Tirukkovalur
  • Re: Review Request 40316: Restore whitelist validation functionality to Sentry Ryan Pridgeon
  • Re: Review Request 40316: Restore whitelist validation functionality to Sentry Ryan Pridgeon
  • Re: Review Request 40316: Restore whitelist validation functionality to Sentry Sravya Tirukkovalur
  • Re: Review Request 40316: Restore whitelist validation functionality to Sentry Ryan Pridgeon
• Review Request 40039: SENTRY-945: Avoid logging all DataNucleus queries when debug logging is enabled Li Li
  • Re: Review Request 40039: SENTRY-945: Avoid logging all DataNucleus queries when debug logging is enabled Li Li
  • Re: Review Request 40039: SENTRY-945: Avoid logging all DataNucleus queries when debug logging is enabled Hao Hao
  • Re: Review Request 40039: SENTRY-945: Avoid logging all DataNucleus queries when debug logging is enabled Li Li
  • Re: Review Request 40039: SENTRY-945: Avoid logging all DataNucleus queries when debug logging is enabled Lenni Kuff
  • Re: Review Request 40039: SENTRY-945: Avoid logging all DataNucleus queries when debug logging is enabled Li Li
• [DISCUSS] Agenda for our 1st hangout - 11/12/15 Sravya Tirukkovalur
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Agenda for our 1st hangout - 11/12/15 Sravya Tirukkovalur
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Agenda for our 1st hangout - 11/12/15 Hao Hao
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Agenda for our 1st hangout - 11/12/15 Sravya Tirukkovalur
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Agenda for our 1st hangout - 11/12/15 Hao Hao
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Agenda for our 1st hangout - 11/12/15 Anne Yu
• Review Request 40239: SENTRY-954: removeAclFeature/addAclFeature should only affect dirs under a prefix which is managed. Ryan Pridgeon
  • Re: Review Request 40239: SENTRY-954: removeAclFeature/addAclFeature should only affect dirs under a prefix which is managed. Sravya Tirukkovalur
  • Re: Review Request 40239: SENTRY-954: removeAclFeature/addAclFeature should only affect dirs under a prefix which is managed. Hao Hao
  • Re: Review Request 40239: SENTRY-954: removeAclFeature/addAclFeature should only affect dirs under a prefix which is managed. Hao Hao
• Re: [jira] [Commented] (SENTRY-954) HDFS ACLs are not correctly managed for paths under prefix but not hive objects. Hao Hao
• [DISCUSS] Cool off period for commits? Lenni Kuff
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Cool off period for commits? Anne Yu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Cool off period for commits? Anne Yu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Cool off period for commits? Ryan P
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Cool off period for commits? Joe Brockmeier
  • RE: [DISCUSS] Cool off period for commits? Sun, Dapeng
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Cool off period for commits? Sravya Tirukkovalur
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Cool off period for commits? Lenni Kuff
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Cool off period for commits? Lenni Kuff
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Cool off period for commits? Lenni Kuff
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Cool off period for commits? Sravya Tirukkovalur
  • RE: [DISCUSS] Cool off period for commits? Ma, Junjie
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Cool off period for commits? Xuefu Zhang
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Cool off period for commits? Patrick Hunt
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Cool off period for commits? Lenni Kuff
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Cool off period for commits? Patrick Hunt
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Cool off period for commits? Prasad Mujumdar
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Cool off period for commits? Lenni Kuff
• Monthly hangout details - 2nd Thursday each month at 5pm PST Sravya Tirukkovalur
• [DISCUSS] Handling of Exception in MetaStoreCacheIntializer Sravya Tirukkovalur
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Handling of Exception in MetaStoreCacheIntializer Ryan P
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Handling of Exception in MetaStoreCacheIntializer Sravya Tirukkovalur
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Handling of Exception in MetaStoreCacheIntializer Lenni Kuff
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Handling of Exception in MetaStoreCacheIntializer Sravya Tirukkovalur
• Sentry-jdk-1.7 - Build # 534 - Unstable Apache Jenkins Server
  • Sentry-jdk-1.7 - Build # 535 - Still Unstable Apache Jenkins Server
  • Sentry-jdk-1.7 - Build # 536 - Fixed Apache Jenkins Server
• OFFLINE (mostly) 9 November - 14 November Joe Brockmeier
• Review Request 40038: SENTRY-955: Add more meta data operation tests for column level privilege Sravya Tirukkovalur
  • Re: Review Request 40038: SENTRY-955: Add more meta data operation tests for column level privilege Hao Hao
  • Re: Review Request 40038: SENTRY-955: Add more meta data operation tests for column level privilege Sravya Tirukkovalur
  • Re: Review Request 40038: SENTRY-955: Add more meta data operation tests for column level privilege Sravya Tirukkovalur
  • Re: Review Request 40038: SENTRY-955: Add more meta data operation tests for column level privilege Anne Yu
  • Re: Review Request 40038: SENTRY-955: Add more meta data operation tests for column level privilege Hao Hao
  • Re: Review Request 40038: SENTRY-955: Add more meta data operation tests for column level privilege Li Li
• Review Request 39928: SENTRY-944: Setting HDFS rules on Sentry managed hdfs paths should not affect original hdfs rules. Hao Hao
  • Re: Review Request 39928: SENTRY-944: Setting HDFS rules on Sentry managed hdfs paths should not affect original hdfs rules. Anne Yu
  • Re: Review Request 39928: SENTRY-944: Setting HDFS rules on Sentry managed hdfs paths should not affect original hdfs rules. Anne Yu
  • Re: Review Request 39928: SENTRY-944: Setting HDFS rules on Sentry managed hdfs paths should not affect original hdfs rules. Sravya Tirukkovalur
  • Re: Review Request 39928: SENTRY-944: Setting HDFS rules on Sentry managed hdfs paths should not affect original hdfs rules. Hao Hao
  • Re: Review Request 39928: SENTRY-944: Setting HDFS rules on Sentry managed hdfs paths should not affect original hdfs rules. Hao Hao
  • Re: Review Request 39928: SENTRY-944: Setting HDFS rules on Sentry managed hdfs paths should not affect original hdfs rules. Hao Hao
  • Re: Review Request 39928: SENTRY-944: Setting HDFS rules on Sentry managed hdfs paths should not affect original hdfs rules. Sravya Tirukkovalur
  • Re: Review Request 39928: SENTRY-944: Setting HDFS rules on Sentry managed hdfs paths should not affect original hdfs rules. Hao Hao
  • Re: Review Request 39928: SENTRY-944: Setting HDFS rules on Sentry managed hdfs paths should not affect original hdfs rules. Sravya Tirukkovalur
  • Re: Review Request 39928: SENTRY-944: Setting HDFS rules on Sentry managed hdfs paths should not affect original hdfs rules. Hao Hao
  • Re: Review Request 39928: SENTRY-944: Setting HDFS rules on Sentry managed hdfs paths should not affect original hdfs rules. Ryan Pridgeon
  • Re: Review Request 39928: SENTRY-944: Setting HDFS rules on Sentry managed hdfs paths should not affect original hdfs rules. Sravya Tirukkovalur
  • Re: Review Request 39928: SENTRY-944: Setting HDFS rules on Sentry managed hdfs paths should not affect original hdfs rules. Hao Hao
  • Re: Review Request 39928: SENTRY-944: Setting HDFS rules on Sentry managed hdfs paths should not affect original hdfs rules. Hao Hao
  • Re: Review Request 39928: SENTRY-944: Setting HDFS rules on Sentry managed hdfs paths should not affect original hdfs rules. Hao Hao
  • Re: Review Request 39928: SENTRY-944: Setting HDFS rules on Sentry managed hdfs paths should not affect original hdfs rules. Hao Hao
  • Re: Review Request 39928: SENTRY-944: Setting HDFS rules on Sentry managed hdfs paths should not affect original hdfs rules. Sravya Tirukkovalur
  • Re: Review Request 39928: SENTRY-944: Setting HDFS rules on Sentry managed hdfs paths should not affect original hdfs rules. Hao Hao
  • Re: Review Request 39928: SENTRY-944: Setting HDFS rules on Sentry managed hdfs paths should not affect original hdfs rules. Hao Hao
  • Re: Review Request 39928: SENTRY-944: Setting HDFS rules on Sentry managed hdfs paths should not affect original hdfs rules. Hao Hao
  • Re: Review Request 39928: SENTRY-944: Setting HDFS rules on Sentry managed hdfs paths should not affect original hdfs rules. Sravya Tirukkovalur
• Sentry-jdk-1.7 - Build # 530 - Failure Apache Jenkins Server
  • Sentry-jdk-1.7 - Build # 531 - Unstable Apache Jenkins Server
  • Sentry-jdk-1.7 - Build # 532 - Fixed Apache Jenkins Server
• Fwd: Concerning Sentry: A disagreement over the Apache Way and graduation Joe Brockmeier
• Review Request 39824: SENTRY-936: getGroup and getUser should always return orginal hdfs values for paths in prefix which are not sentry managed Sravya Tirukkovalur
  • Re: Review Request 39824: SENTRY-936: getGroup and getUser should always return orginal hdfs values for paths in prefix which are not sentry managed Li Li
• Review Request 39801: SENTRY-498: Sentry integration with Hive authorization framework V2 Dapeng Sun
  • Re: Review Request 39801: SENTRY-498: Sentry integration with Hive authorization framework V2 Li Li
  • Re: Review Request 39801: SENTRY-498: Sentry integration with Hive authorization framework V2 Dapeng Sun
  • Re: Review Request 39801: SENTRY-498: Sentry integration with Hive authorization framework V2 Dapeng Sun
  • Re: Review Request 39801: SENTRY-498: Sentry integration with Hive authorization framework V2 Colin Ma
  • Re: Review Request 39801: SENTRY-498: Sentry integration with Hive authorization framework V2 Dapeng Sun
  • Re: Review Request 39801: SENTRY-498: Sentry integration with Hive authorization framework V2 Dapeng Sun
• JDK6 compatibility Colm O hEigeartaigh
  • Re: JDK6 compatibility Anne Yu
  • Re: JDK6 compatibility Colm O hEigeartaigh
  • Re: JDK6 compatibility Anne Yu
  • Re: JDK6 compatibility Colm O hEigeartaigh
  • Re: JDK6 compatibility Anne Yu
  • RE: JDK6 compatibility Sun, Dapeng
  • Re: JDK6 compatibility Colm O hEigeartaigh
• Review Request 39677: SENTRY-915: Improve Hive E2E tests for keep consistent with Hive metadata Dapeng Sun
  • Re: Review Request 39677: SENTRY-915: Improve Hive E2E tests for keep consistent with Hive metadata Dapeng Sun
  • Re: Review Request 39677: SENTRY-915: Improve Hive E2E tests for keep consistent with Hive metadata shen guoquan
  • Re: Review Request 39677: SENTRY-915: Improve Hive E2E tests for keep consistent with Hive metadata Dapeng Sun
  • Re: Review Request 39677: SENTRY-915: Improve Hive E2E tests for keep consistent with Hive metadata Dapeng Sun
  • Re: Review Request 39677: SENTRY-915: Improve Hive E2E tests for keep consistent with Hive metadata shen guoquan
• Sentry-jdk-1.7 - Build # 525 - Unstable Apache Jenkins Server
  • Sentry-jdk-1.7 - Build # 526 - Fixed Apache Jenkins Server
• Sentry 1.4 and Hive 0.13 configured to SSL oandreychenko
• Sentry-jdk-1.7 - Build # 522 - Unstable Apache Jenkins Server
  • Sentry-jdk-1.7 - Build # 523 - Fixed Apache Jenkins Server
• Sentry-jdk-1.7 - Build # 520 - Unstable Apache Jenkins Server
  • Sentry-jdk-1.7 - Build # 521 - Fixed Apache Jenkins Server
• [VOTE] Monthly hangout? Sravya Tirukkovalur
  • Re: [VOTE] Monthly hangout? Anne Yu
  • RE: [VOTE] Monthly hangout? Ma, Junjie
  • RE: [VOTE] Monthly hangout? Sun, Dapeng
  • RE: [VOTE] Monthly hangout? Lenni Kuff
  • Re: [VOTE] Monthly hangout? Sravya Tirukkovalur

• Earlier messages
• Later messages