Thanks for putting together this list Prasad, let's start knocking these
items off. It seems like there is a lot of low hanging fruit.

Thanks,
Lenni
On Jun 5, 2015 10:44 AM, "Prasad Mujumdar" <[email protected]> wrote:

>    @Mentors, monthly reports are fine if that's helping to show the
> progress in the project.
>
> As discussed on the private@, here's the summary of the action items for
> the community in order to address the concerns -
> - Update the website for status file. - Tracked via SENTRY-759
> - Fix the mailing list archive link on Sentry page - Tracked via SENTRY-759
> - Review and Update 'How to xxx' steps - Tracked via SENTRY-759
> - Start discussion thread on dev@ about adding a project roadmap page on
> wiki - Pending
> - Add/improve committer/ppmc responsibilities listing on the wiki - Tracked
> via SENTRY-760
> - Add release discussion step in how to release - Tracked via SENTRY-760
> - Create checklist for how to vote on release  - Tracked via SENTRY-760
>
> Based on the current feedback, we will add monthly reporting to the PPMC
> responsibilities. Patrick's suggestion of community members volunteering in
> advance for next report sounds good. We could try that for next few
> reports.
>
> thanks
> Prasad
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 5:01 PM, Sravya Tirukkovalur <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 for the idea.
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > I suspect that not getting the report out early is a side effect of not
> > > having a specific person assigned to generate the report. Everyone
> > assumes
> > > everyone else will do it. Perhaps it would help if you identified a
> > > particular person, at the start of each period, who is responsible for
> > the
> > > next report?
> > >
> > > Patrick
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Sravya Tirukkovalur <
> [email protected]
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > My sincere apologies for not being able to put together the report
> much
> > > in
> > > > advance. I did send out the email one day prior, so that members of
> all
> > > > time zones get a chance to review though, but I agree sooner would
> have
> > > > been definitely better. Also I was not really sure if the concerns
> > raised
> > > > should be listed in the board report or they were mostly for the
> > podling
> > > > members to keep track, rectify and improve on it.
> > > >
> > > > Community has started working on the concerns raised and hoping to
> > > resolve
> > > > most of it soon. And I see that most of the product discussions
> happen
> > on
> > > > jira/review board, but I agree that it will be good to start
> > discussions
> > > > first on dev list for more community involvement.
> > > >
> > > > As we cannot edit the report now, I think it is fair enough to submit
> > > > monthly reports for a bit until we resolve all the concerns raised.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 2:57 AM, Joe Brockmeier <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2015, at 03:44 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> > > > > > Hi folks:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I apologize for a lack of engagement of late. That has caused
> > > > > > problems. (lack of oversight on the release vote for instance)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I left comments on the board report about concerns I have, and
> > wanted
> > > > > > to ensure that it's a conversation we continue and that it
> doesn't
> > > > > > just get lost.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So here are my comments - and one of the links will not work for
> > you,
> > > > > > but do work for the board members and IPMC members reviewing the
> > > board
> > > > > > report. My goal is not to beat up, or complain, but ensure that
> > > things
> > > > > > improve and that this projects successfully graduates.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > dn: Recently during the conversation around graduation, mentors
> > have
> > > > > > raised a number of concerns. The gravest of these is concerns
> > > > > > around where project direction is occurring.
> > > > > > See http://s.apache.org/sentrygraddiscussion for more detail.
> > > > > > Additionally, it was discovered that Sentry did not follow the
> > > > > > Incubator release process for the 1.5.0 release - though that is
> > now
> > > > > > being rectified on general@ - see:
> > > > > > http://s.apache.org/sentryreleaseissue
> > > > > > I am somewhat concerned that the report mentions neither of these
> > > > > > things and for that reason, I am withholding signoff.
> > > > >
> > > > > Full agreement here. Also, I'm disappointed after the feedback I've
> > > > > given elsewhere that -- once again -- the board report is being
> > pulled
> > > > > together at the last minute without the opportunity for actual
> > > community
> > > > > review of the report. The community should have at least 72 hours
> to
> > > > > review something like this for proper discussion.
> > > > >
> > > > > I see an enormous disconnect between the project's report and the
> > > > > reality. There are very serious concerns about the podling that
> have
> > > > > been expressed to the project and they are not reflected here.
> > > > >
> > > > > > I also think it would be reasonable for the podling to report
> > monthly
> > > > > > for the next three months or so to report on progress dealing
> with
> > > > > > these issues.
> > > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > > --David
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Sravya Tirukkovalur <
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > Thank you all for proof reading! I just posted the report to
> > > > incubator
> > > > > wiki.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Gregory Chanan <
> > > [email protected]
> > > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> lgtm.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Greg
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Lenni Kuff <
> > [email protected]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> > +1 - lgtm, thanks for writing this up Sravya.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Prasad Mujumdar <
> > > > > [email protected]>
> > > > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > >   Looks fine to me. Thanks Sravya.
> > > > > > >> > > +1
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > > thanks
> > > > > > >> > > Prasad
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > > On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Sravya Tirukkovalur <
> > > > > > >> > [email protected]>
> > > > > > >> > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > > > Thank you Prasad for the feedback! Made the changes.
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Prasad Mujumdar <
> > > > > > >> [email protected]
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > >    Thanks Sravya for putting this together! Looks
> mostly
> > > > > fine. A
> > > > > > >> few
> > > > > > >> > > > minor
> > > > > > >> > > > > comments/suggestions below -
> > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > bq. Sentry community is getting ready for graduation.
> > > > > > >> > > > > I am not sure if we want to mention that under
> "issues"
> > > > > section.
> > > > > > >> How
> > > > > > >> > > > about
> > > > > > >> > > > > adding that to community or project section ?
> > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > Date of last release - IMO we should wait for IPMC
> vote
> > > for
> > > > > new
> > > > > > >> > > release.
> > > > > > >> > > > We
> > > > > > >> > > > > can mention the new release vote underway in the
> > community
> > > > > section.
> > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > thanks
> > > > > > >> > > > > Prasad
> > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Sravya Tirukkovalur <
> > > > > > >> > [email protected]
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > > Here is a draft of report [1]. Please let me know if
> > you
> > > > > have any
> > > > > > >> > > > > > suggestions. As we need to submit this today, I will
> > > wait
> > > > > for
> > > > > > >> > > another 6
> > > > > > >> > > > > > hours before submitting it on incubator page. If I
> > > receive
> > > > > > >> feedback
> > > > > > >> > > > after
> > > > > > >> > > > > > that I will update it directly there.
> > > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > > >> > > > > > [1]:
> > > > > > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SENTRY/June+2015
> > > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > --
> > > > > > >> > > > Sravya Tirukkovalur
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Sravya Tirukkovalur
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > >
> > > > > jzb
> > > > > --
> > > > > Joe Brockmeier
> > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > Twitter: @jzb
> > > > > http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Sravya Tirukkovalur
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sravya Tirukkovalur
> >
>

Reply via email to