About the new Service-Center UI, some ideas from the user's point of view, 1. The function of the old UI is stable at 1.0.0-m2, including featrures and configuration files. The new UI should provide stable and usable features, and do not displayed test phase featrures in the UI interface to avoid misleading users, such as SCHEMA Test in 1.0.0-m1. 2. If there is no user appeal in the old UI, it is recommended to maintain compatibility, including the original usage methods, functions, and back-end interfaces,it is not excluded that the user may develop the UI by himself. If there are changes, it is recommended to provide detailed instructions. 3. I have seen some new features are added in the new UI. It is recommended that each function provide detailed instructions for users to understand and use quickly. 4. Need to provide Chinese version UI and manual : )
Best Wishes & Regards ------------------------------- Mabin Zen Lin <[email protected]> 于2018年7月17日周二 下午3:36写道： > +1 > > Best Regards, > --- > Zen Lin > [email protected] > Focused on Micro Service and Apache ServiceComb > > > Willem Jiang <[email protected]> 于2018年7月17日周二 下午3:33写道： > > > I cannot agree with you more about it. > > We need to avoid this kind of situation in our further development. > > Before we start writing the code, it's quite important that we need to > send > > a heads up or proposal to let others know about it. > > > > > > Willem Jiang > > > > Twitter: willemjiang > > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 3:22 PM, wjm wjm <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > ok > > > > > > but i think it's better raise proposal before start work on it. > > > > > > 2018-07-17 15:04 GMT+08:00 Willem Jiang <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > It‘s no harm if the development is down. We just need to get more > feed > > > > back from the community and consider to merge the UI to the new UI. > > > > For the UI, there are some License stuff of java script library we > need > > > to > > > > care about. We may need to address this issue before CSE UI is open > > > > sourced. > > > > > > > > > > > > Willem Jiang > > > > > > > > Twitter: willemjiang > > > > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 1:36 PM, Mohammad Asif Siddiqui < > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Guyz, > > > > > > > > > > The development of these design was already done before and that's > > the > > > > > reason we were able to show the snapshots of the new UI. The code > is > > > > ready > > > > > to be merged but before merging we decided to come here and discuss > > > about > > > > > this UI for people opinion. Since most of the people are concerned > > > about > > > > > the effort needed to re-design this UI, so I would like to tell > that > > > > > development is already done. > > > > > > > > > > So in my opinion we can merge this change to make the UI better and > > > > > whenever ServiceComb-UI gets opensourced then we can plan to merge > > some > > > > of > > > > > these designs to the ServiceComb-UI. > > > > > > > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > > > > > > > Regrds > > > > > Asif > > > > > > > > > > On 2018/07/16 10:57:00, Zen Lin <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > As we known, CSE is a initial commercial product of servicecomb > > and > > > we > > > > > > have tried our best to ask CSE to open source ServiceComb-UI to > > > > stronger > > > > > > servicecomb and let servicecomb service users better. > > > > > > But I think the discuss should focused on what's difference > > between > > > > > > servicecenter UI positioning and servicecomb UI positioning. > > > > > > > > > > > > If we sure the functionality of servicecenter UI is a subset of > of > > > > > > servicecomb UI which will be opensourceed future, and Asif have > > > willing > > > > > to > > > > > > keep on developing and maintaining a servicenter UI, will will > have > > > two > > > > > UI > > > > > > in future, I think that is allowed with a opensource project > also. > > > > > > > > > > > > Therefore, to my opinion, I think we can focused on discussing > > > > > > servicecenter-UI's position, something like, what functionality > for > > > > > > service-center UI is reasonable? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > > > --- > > > > > > Zen Lin > > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > Focused on Micro Service and Apache ServiceComb > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wjm wjm <[email protected]> 于2018年7月16日周一 下午12:43写道： > > > > > > > > > > > > > maybe we can change our mind to: make sure new feathers all in > > > > > > > ServiceComb-UI, not design a new one. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2018-07-16 12:41 GMT+08:00 wjm wjm <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as i said that, Proposal of new SC frontend seems to be a > > subset > > > of > > > > > > > > ServiceComb-UI > > > > > > > > if that's true, i think we no need to spend time to do one > > thing > > > > > with two > > > > > > > > way. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2018-07-16 11:58 GMT+08:00 Mohammad Asif Siddiqui < > > > > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Hi Sure, > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> If this new ServiceComb-UI(as per your mail) is opensourced > > then > > > > > will > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > >> exsisting service-center frontend deprecated?, If NO then I > > > still > > > > > > > believe > > > > > > > >> it's a good thought to upgrade the exsisting Service-Center > > > > > frontend. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> Regards > > > > > > > >> Asif > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> On 2018/07/16 00:51:06, "Sure" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > >> > -1 > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > we will publish the cse-UI in servicecomb(named > > servicecomb-UI > > > > may > > > > > > > be), > > > > > > > >> this’s the unified console of sc,cc and monitoring. So we > just > > > > need > > > > > to > > > > > > > cost > > > > > > > >> a little of time to fix bugs of SC-UI. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > The sericecomb-UI will be more valuable in the future > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > 发自我的iPhone > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > ------------------ Original ------------------ > > > > > > > >> > From: Mohammad Asif Siddiqui <[email protected]> > > > > > > > >> > Date: Fri,Jul 13,2018 7:55 PM > > > > > > > >> > To: dev <[email protected]> > > > > > > > >> > Cc: krishna.m.kumar <[email protected]>, > > > sanil.kumar < > > > > > > > >> [email protected]>, vinaym <[email protected]> > > > > > > > >> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal for Re-Design of > > > Service-Center > > > > > > > Frontend > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > Hi All, > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > As we have continously put an effort to improve the > > > > > Service-Center UI > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > >> > make it more usable and user friendly, going forwards I > > would > > > > > like to > > > > > > > >> > propose some major changes in the Design of frontend. Some > > of > > > > > those > > > > > > > >> changes > > > > > > > >> > will include : > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > 1. Update Dashboard to have a more better snapshot of what > > > > > > > >> > entities/resources are present in the Service-Center env. > > > > > > > >> > 2. A place holder in Dashboard to contain the basic User > > > > > Guide/FAQ for > > > > > > > >> > ServiceComb. > > > > > > > >> > 3. Add a new page for showing the list of instances which > > are > > > > > > > currently > > > > > > > >> > running and registered in service-center. > > > > > > > >> > 4. Add a new page for showing the topology of > Microservices, > > > > this > > > > > page > > > > > > > >> will > > > > > > > >> > describe the relationship between the different > > microservices > > > > and > > > > > some > > > > > > > >> > metadata of the microservices. > > > > > > > >> > 5. Advanced search criteria for Service and Instance List. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > Here is the Snapshot[1] of the changes we are planning to > > do. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > Most of the features development have been completed and > we > > > are > > > > > > > >> planning to > > > > > > > >> > put this change in the 1.0.0 release of Service-Center. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > Any thought on this? > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > [1] > > > > > > > >> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-servicecomb-service-cent > > > > > > > >> er/wiki/Service-Center-UI-Re-design > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > Regards > > > > > > > >> > Asif > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
