There is a vote of Service-Center 1.0.0, please spend some time play with it. Now we just need to make sure the UI is work as we expected.
Willem Jiang Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 11:35 AM, Bin Ma <[email protected]> wrote: > About the new Service-Center UI, some ideas from the user's point of view, > 1. The function of the old UI is stable at 1.0.0-m2, including featrures > and configuration files. The new UI should provide stable and usable > features, and do not displayed test phase featrures in the UI interface to > avoid misleading users, such as SCHEMA Test in 1.0.0-m1. > 2. If there is no user appeal in the old UI, it is recommended to maintain > compatibility, including the original usage methods, functions, and > back-end interfaces,it is not excluded that the user may develop the UI by > himself. If there are changes, it is recommended to provide detailed > instructions. > 3. I have seen some new features are added in the new UI. It is recommended > that each function provide detailed instructions for users to understand > and use quickly. > 4. Need to provide Chinese version UI and manual : ) > > Best Wishes & Regards > ------------------------------- > Mabin > > > > Zen Lin <[email protected]> 于2018年7月17日周二 下午3:36写道： > > > +1 > > > > Best Regards, > > --- > > Zen Lin > > [email protected] > > Focused on Micro Service and Apache ServiceComb > > > > > > Willem Jiang <[email protected]> 于2018年7月17日周二 下午3:33写道： > > > > > I cannot agree with you more about it. > > > We need to avoid this kind of situation in our further development. > > > Before we start writing the code, it's quite important that we need to > > send > > > a heads up or proposal to let others know about it. > > > > > > > > > Willem Jiang > > > > > > Twitter: willemjiang > > > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 3:22 PM, wjm wjm <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > ok > > > > > > > > but i think it's better raise proposal before start work on it. > > > > > > > > 2018-07-17 15:04 GMT+08:00 Willem Jiang <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > > > It‘s no harm if the development is down. We just need to get more > > feed > > > > > back from the community and consider to merge the UI to the new UI. > > > > > For the UI, there are some License stuff of java script library we > > need > > > > to > > > > > care about. We may need to address this issue before CSE UI is open > > > > > sourced. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Willem Jiang > > > > > > > > > > Twitter: willemjiang > > > > > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 1:36 PM, Mohammad Asif Siddiqui < > > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Guyz, > > > > > > > > > > > > The development of these design was already done before and > that's > > > the > > > > > > reason we were able to show the snapshots of the new UI. The code > > is > > > > > ready > > > > > > to be merged but before merging we decided to come here and > discuss > > > > about > > > > > > this UI for people opinion. Since most of the people are > concerned > > > > about > > > > > > the effort needed to re-design this UI, so I would like to tell > > that > > > > > > development is already done. > > > > > > > > > > > > So in my opinion we can merge this change to make the UI better > and > > > > > > whenever ServiceComb-UI gets opensourced then we can plan to > merge > > > some > > > > > of > > > > > > these designs to the ServiceComb-UI. > > > > > > > > > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > > > > > > > > > Regrds > > > > > > Asif > > > > > > > > > > > > On 2018/07/16 10:57:00, Zen Lin <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > As we known, CSE is a initial commercial product of > servicecomb > > > and > > > > we > > > > > > > have tried our best to ask CSE to open source ServiceComb-UI to > > > > > stronger > > > > > > > servicecomb and let servicecomb service users better. > > > > > > > But I think the discuss should focused on what's difference > > > between > > > > > > > servicecenter UI positioning and servicecomb UI positioning. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If we sure the functionality of servicecenter UI is a subset of > > of > > > > > > > servicecomb UI which will be opensourceed future, and Asif have > > > > willing > > > > > > to > > > > > > > keep on developing and maintaining a servicenter UI, will will > > have > > > > two > > > > > > UI > > > > > > > in future, I think that is allowed with a opensource project > > also. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Therefore, to my opinion, I think we can focused on discussing > > > > > > > servicecenter-UI's position, something like, what functionality > > for > > > > > > > service-center UI is reasonable? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > Zen Lin > > > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > Focused on Micro Service and Apache ServiceComb > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wjm wjm <[email protected]> 于2018年7月16日周一 下午12:43写道： > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > maybe we can change our mind to: make sure new feathers all > in > > > > > > > > ServiceComb-UI, not design a new one. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2018-07-16 12:41 GMT+08:00 wjm wjm <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as i said that, Proposal of new SC frontend seems to be a > > > subset > > > > of > > > > > > > > > ServiceComb-UI > > > > > > > > > if that's true, i think we no need to spend time to do one > > > thing > > > > > > with two > > > > > > > > > way. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2018-07-16 11:58 GMT+08:00 Mohammad Asif Siddiqui < > > > > > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > > : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Hi Sure, > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> If this new ServiceComb-UI(as per your mail) is > opensourced > > > then > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > >> exsisting service-center frontend deprecated?, If NO then > I > > > > still > > > > > > > > believe > > > > > > > > >> it's a good thought to upgrade the exsisting > Service-Center > > > > > > frontend. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> Regards > > > > > > > > >> Asif > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> On 2018/07/16 00:51:06, "Sure" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > >> > -1 > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > we will publish the cse-UI in servicecomb(named > > > servicecomb-UI > > > > > may > > > > > > > > be), > > > > > > > > >> this’s the unified console of sc,cc and monitoring. So we > > just > > > > > need > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > cost > > > > > > > > >> a little of time to fix bugs of SC-UI. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > The sericecomb-UI will be more valuable in the future > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > 发自我的iPhone > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > ------------------ Original ------------------ > > > > > > > > >> > From: Mohammad Asif Siddiqui <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > >> > Date: Fri,Jul 13,2018 7:55 PM > > > > > > > > >> > To: dev <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > >> > Cc: krishna.m.kumar <[email protected]>, > > > > sanil.kumar < > > > > > > > > >> [email protected]>, vinaym <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > >> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal for Re-Design of > > > > Service-Center > > > > > > > > Frontend > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > Hi All, > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > As we have continously put an effort to improve the > > > > > > Service-Center UI > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > >> > make it more usable and user friendly, going forwards I > > > would > > > > > > like to > > > > > > > > >> > propose some major changes in the Design of frontend. > Some > > > of > > > > > > those > > > > > > > > >> changes > > > > > > > > >> > will include : > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > 1. Update Dashboard to have a more better snapshot of > what > > > > > > > > >> > entities/resources are present in the Service-Center > env. > > > > > > > > >> > 2. A place holder in Dashboard to contain the basic User > > > > > > Guide/FAQ for > > > > > > > > >> > ServiceComb. > > > > > > > > >> > 3. Add a new page for showing the list of instances > which > > > are > > > > > > > > currently > > > > > > > > >> > running and registered in service-center. > > > > > > > > >> > 4. Add a new page for showing the topology of > > Microservices, > > > > > this > > > > > > page > > > > > > > > >> will > > > > > > > > >> > describe the relationship between the different > > > microservices > > > > > and > > > > > > some > > > > > > > > >> > metadata of the microservices. > > > > > > > > >> > 5. Advanced search criteria for Service and Instance > List. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > Here is the Snapshot[1] of the changes we are planning > to > > > do. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > Most of the features development have been completed and > > we > > > > are > > > > > > > > >> planning to > > > > > > > > >> > put this change in the 1.0.0 release of Service-Center. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > Any thought on this? > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > [1] > > > > > > > > >> > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-servicecomb-service-cent > > > > > > > > >> er/wiki/Service-Center-UI-Re-design > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > Regards > > > > > > > > >> > Asif > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
