Ok. It makes sense. As we have nothing more to do with 5.2.0 I can stage today ans start the vote. Next I could do the Karaf upgrade in 5.[3,4].x. It would be good if you could write the migrations news
Regaeds Krzysztof On Jan 9, 2015 3:11 PM, "Gert Vanthienen" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Krzysztof, > > > This is one of those two branches to allow people to smoothly > transition from Karaf 2.3.x/Camel 2.13.x to Karaf 2.4.x/Camel 2.14.x - > in this case, by upgrading the Camel version first and staying with > the original Karaf version. Since we already have the branch set up, I > think it would make sense to do at least one release of it. Perhaps we > can do a little "migration" news item to explain the use case for the > 5.2.0 and 5.3.0 as intermediate releases? If you're already too busy > doing the other two releases, I don't mind sharing a bit of the > workload and doing this one. > > > Regards, > > Gert Vanthienen > Regards, > > Gert Vanthienen > > > On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi > > > > We have another branch using following components: > > > > Dependency Version > > ActiveMQ 5.10.0 > > Camel 2.14.1 > > CXF 3.0.2 > > Karaf 2.3.9 > > > > > > We have never released from this branch. Do you think we should release > > 5.2.0? > > > > Regards > > Krzysztof > > > > > > > > -- > > Krzysztof Sobkowiak > > > > JEE & OSS Architect | Senior Solution Architect @ Capgemini | Committer > > @ ASF > > Capgemini <http://www.pl.capgemini.com/> | Software Solutions Center > > <http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/> | Wroclaw > > e-mail: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> | > > Twitter: @KSobkowiak > > Calendar: http://goo.gl/yvsebC >
