+1
it sounds good to me.
Regards
JB
On 01/09/2015 03:30 PM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak wrote:
Ok. It makes sense. As we have nothing more to do with 5.2.0 I can stage
today ans start the vote. Next I could do the Karaf upgrade in 5.[3,4].x.
It would be good if you could write the migrations news
Regaeds
Krzysztof
On Jan 9, 2015 3:11 PM, "Gert Vanthienen" <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Krzysztof,
This is one of those two branches to allow people to smoothly
transition from Karaf 2.3.x/Camel 2.13.x to Karaf 2.4.x/Camel 2.14.x -
in this case, by upgrading the Camel version first and staying with
the original Karaf version. Since we already have the branch set up, I
think it would make sense to do at least one release of it. Perhaps we
can do a little "migration" news item to explain the use case for the
5.2.0 and 5.3.0 as intermediate releases? If you're already too busy
doing the other two releases, I don't mind sharing a bit of the
workload and doing this one.
Regards,
Gert Vanthienen
Regards,
Gert Vanthienen
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi
We have another branch using following components:
Dependency Version
ActiveMQ 5.10.0
Camel 2.14.1
CXF 3.0.2
Karaf 2.3.9
We have never released from this branch. Do you think we should release
5.2.0?
Regards
Krzysztof
--
Krzysztof Sobkowiak
JEE & OSS Architect | Senior Solution Architect @ Capgemini | Committer
@ ASF
Capgemini <http://www.pl.capgemini.com/> | Software Solutions Center
<http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/> | Wroclaw
e-mail: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> |
Twitter: @KSobkowiak
Calendar: http://goo.gl/yvsebC
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[email protected]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
