+1. I like this Regards Krzysztof
On 13.01.2015 10:20, Gert Vanthienen wrote: > L.S., > > How does http://servicemix.apache.org/news/moving_from_51_to_54.html sound? > > Regards, > > Gert Vanthienen > > > On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Ok. It makes sense. As we have nothing more to do with 5.2.0 I can stage >> today ans start the vote. Next I could do the Karaf upgrade in 5.[3,4].x. >> It would be good if you could write the migrations news >> >> Regaeds >> Krzysztof >> On Jan 9, 2015 3:11 PM, "Gert Vanthienen" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Krzysztof, >>> >>> >>> This is one of those two branches to allow people to smoothly >>> transition from Karaf 2.3.x/Camel 2.13.x to Karaf 2.4.x/Camel 2.14.x - >>> in this case, by upgrading the Camel version first and staying with >>> the original Karaf version. Since we already have the branch set up, I >>> think it would make sense to do at least one release of it. Perhaps we >>> can do a little "migration" news item to explain the use case for the >>> 5.2.0 and 5.3.0 as intermediate releases? If you're already too busy >>> doing the other two releases, I don't mind sharing a bit of the >>> workload and doing this one. >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Gert Vanthienen >>> Regards, >>> >>> Gert Vanthienen >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Hi >>>> >>>> We have another branch using following components: >>>> >>>> Dependency Version >>>> ActiveMQ 5.10.0 >>>> Camel 2.14.1 >>>> CXF 3.0.2 >>>> Karaf 2.3.9 >>>> >>>> >>>> We have never released from this branch. Do you think we should release >>>> 5.2.0? >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Krzysztof >>>> >>> -- Krzysztof Sobkowiak JEE & OSS Architect | Senior Solution Architect @ Capgemini | Committer @ ASF Capgemini <http://www.pl.capgemini.com/> | Software Solutions Center <http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/> | Wroclaw e-mail: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> | Twitter: @KSobkowiak Calendar: http://goo.gl/yvsebC
