L.S., How does http://servicemix.apache.org/news/moving_from_51_to_54.html sound?
Regards, Gert Vanthienen On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak <[email protected]> wrote: > Ok. It makes sense. As we have nothing more to do with 5.2.0 I can stage > today ans start the vote. Next I could do the Karaf upgrade in 5.[3,4].x. > It would be good if you could write the migrations news > > Regaeds > Krzysztof > On Jan 9, 2015 3:11 PM, "Gert Vanthienen" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Krzysztof, >> >> >> This is one of those two branches to allow people to smoothly >> transition from Karaf 2.3.x/Camel 2.13.x to Karaf 2.4.x/Camel 2.14.x - >> in this case, by upgrading the Camel version first and staying with >> the original Karaf version. Since we already have the branch set up, I >> think it would make sense to do at least one release of it. Perhaps we >> can do a little "migration" news item to explain the use case for the >> 5.2.0 and 5.3.0 as intermediate releases? If you're already too busy >> doing the other two releases, I don't mind sharing a bit of the >> workload and doing this one. >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Gert Vanthienen >> Regards, >> >> Gert Vanthienen >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hi >> > >> > We have another branch using following components: >> > >> > Dependency Version >> > ActiveMQ 5.10.0 >> > Camel 2.14.1 >> > CXF 3.0.2 >> > Karaf 2.3.9 >> > >> > >> > We have never released from this branch. Do you think we should release >> > 5.2.0? >> > >> > Regards >> > Krzysztof >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Krzysztof Sobkowiak >> > >> > JEE & OSS Architect | Senior Solution Architect @ Capgemini | Committer >> > @ ASF >> > Capgemini <http://www.pl.capgemini.com/> | Software Solutions Center >> > <http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/> | Wroclaw >> > e-mail: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> | >> > Twitter: @KSobkowiak >> > Calendar: http://goo.gl/yvsebC >>
