[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5035?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14803033#comment-14803033
]
Bertrand Delacretaz commented on SLING-5035:
--------------------------------------------
I would not make that change...we did the same thing for Sling Filters in
SLING-2920 and I think everybody agrees that this was a mistake.
Although the current behavior might not be optimal, it works, and both
conventions (higher wins or lower wins) are valid and used in different places.
Changing the behavior would result in some existing injectors using the old
convention and others using the new one, which is the mess that we're seeing
with Filters after SLING-2920.
> Sling Models Injectors should be queried in the reverse order of their
> service ranking value
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SLING-5035
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5035
> Project: Sling
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Extensions
> Affects Versions: Sling Models Impl 1.2.2
> Reporter: Radu Cotescu
> Fix For: Sling Models Impl 1.2.4
>
>
> The current version of the {{ModelAdaptorFactory}} \[0\] queries the
> Injectors in the ascending order of their service ranking value. However they
> should be queried in the descending order of the service ranking, to use the
> same logic as the {{BundleContext#getServiceReference(String)}} method \[1\].
> \[0\] -
> https://github.com/apache/sling/blob/f56b444b765beb1c31eed01b4c09fbda4013a580/bundles/extensions/models/impl/src/main/java/org/apache/sling/models/impl/ModelAdapterFactory.java#L411
> \[1\] -
> https://osgi.org/javadoc/r4v42/org/osgi/framework/BundleContext.html#getServiceReference(java.lang.String)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
