Hi all Sling Thread Support (aka Commons Threads) uses an underlying java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor. By default this leads to thread names like "pool-1-thread-5".
I was wondering whether we should change the thread names so it is clear they are being managed by Sling Thread Support. Also, since Pools can be named, it may make sense to include the pool name. I imagine something along the lines of "Apache Sling - <pool name> - Thread #<counter>", e.g. "Apache Sling - Job Thread Pool - Thread #3". What do others think? Any objections? If there is agreement, I'll create a JIRA issue and go ahead with the implementation. Regards Julian
