I’m in favour for changing the thread names to the format "Apache Sling - <pool name> -Thread #<counter>” Konrad
> On 01 Dec 2015, at 10:15, Julian Sedding <jsedd...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all > > Sling Thread Support (aka Commons Threads) uses an underlying > java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor. By default this leads to > thread names like "pool-1-thread-5". > > I was wondering whether we should change the thread names so it is > clear they are being managed by Sling Thread Support. Also, since > Pools can be named, it may make sense to include the pool name. I > imagine something along the lines of "Apache Sling - <pool name> - > Thread #<counter>", e.g. "Apache Sling - Job Thread Pool - Thread #3". > > What do others think? Any objections? If there is agreement, I'll > create a JIRA issue and go ahead with the implementation. > > Regards > Julian
