On 21/09/16 11:12, "Carsten Ziegeler" <cziege...@apache.org> wrote:
>> On 21/09/16 08:13, "Carsten Ziegeler" <cziege...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> Finally, recently some people suggested that we support all of Oaks
>>> filtering possibilities for the ResourceChangeListener. I'm not a fan
>>> that - first of all, we should only support what is really needed.
>>> Second, as soon as we support it, it means that every resource provider
>>> needs to support it which might but a high burden for nothing on the
>>> implementations. And finally, as we already see with the globbing,
>>> filtering is nice but we have to be careful for remove events and
>>> clearly specifiy how this works - and specify it in a way that it
>>> works for the listeners.
>> What about support for the famous ExcludeExternal?
>That's already there - a listener by default just listens for local
>events. If it implements ExternalRCL as well (marker interface), it gets
>the external events as well
Ah, good to know!