> On 21/09/16 14:14, "Robert Munteanu" <romb...@apache.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, 2016-09-21 at 14:11 +0200, Stefan Egli wrote:
>>> On 21/09/16 11:26, "Robert Munteanu" <romb...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 2016-09-21 at 11:18 +0200, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>>>>> So we a) need to clarify the contract and b) think about what we
>>>>> do
>>>>> if
>>>>> someone registers for a glob pattern. Do we send removal of
>>>>> parents
>>>>> automatically or do we expect to listener to register at /?
>>>> I would say that we send removal of parents automatically, it's
>>>> simpler
>>>> for the clients.
>>> Ok, I start to see the advantage of getting automatically notified on
>>> parent removal.. am thinking though if such a choice should not be up
>>> to
>>> the listener (perhaps yes, with default 'true')?
>> In what scenarios would it be useful to have this choice?
> Good question, I'll try to come up with one :) Not in the cache scenario,
> agreed. How's the exact definition here though: say you register for
> removal of **.jsp - are you getting notified *only* for parents that
> actually contain any *.jsp I assume? Otherwise I'm expecting noise..
How does the sender now?



Carsten Ziegeler
Adobe Research Switzerland

Reply via email to