On 21/09/16 14:14, "Robert Munteanu" <romb...@apache.org> wrote:

>On Wed, 2016-09-21 at 14:11 +0200, Stefan Egli wrote:
>> On 21/09/16 11:26, "Robert Munteanu" <romb...@apache.org> wrote:
>> 
>> > 
>> > On Wed, 2016-09-21 at 11:18 +0200, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>> > > 
>> > > So we a) need to clarify the contract and b) think about what we
>> > > do
>> > > if
>> > > someone registers for a glob pattern. Do we send removal of
>> > > parents
>> > > automatically or do we expect to listener to register at /?
>> > 
>> > I would say that we send removal of parents automatically, it's
>> > simpler
>> > for the clients.
>> 
>> Ok, I start to see the advantage of getting automatically notified on
>> parent removal.. am thinking though if such a choice should not be up
>> to
>> the listener (perhaps yes, with default 'true')?
>
>In what scenarios would it be useful to have this choice?

Good question, I'll try to come up with one :) Not in the cache scenario,
agreed. How's the exact definition here though: say you register for
removal of **.jsp - are you getting notified *only* for parents that
actually contain any *.jsp I assume? Otherwise I'm expecting noise..

Cheers,
Stefan


Reply via email to