On Friday 13 October 2017 13:00:53 Ian Boston wrote: > On 13 October 2017 at 11:16, Robert Munteanu <romb...@apache.org> wrote: > > Hi Ian,
Hi, > > On Fri, 2017-10-13 at 10:51 +0100, Ian Boston wrote: > > > Hi, > > > I would like to upgrade Sling to depend on Oak 1.7.9 as it was just > > > released. The patch be the same as [1] with 1.7.8 replaced by 1.7.9. > > > > > > Any objections ? > > > > No objections here. > > > > Related to the pull request - is it required for bundles consuming > > testing.paxexam to bump up their dependency version? > > If those bundles want to perform integration tests on Oak 1.7.9 then they > need to bump the dependency. > Some do, some dont, so I bumped all to make certain all would still build > on Oak 1.7.9. > > The first one that needs to do a release, will have to release paxexam at > the same time... and fix the references to the 0.0.5-SNAPSHOT version. > > I assume that was done before since all were on 0.0.4. no need for a new release of Testing PaxExam (but will do a release soon anyway), you can override the version for Oak with the one from POM (was done in the past e.g. for Oak Server): https://github.com/apache/sling/tree/trunk/testing/org.apache.sling.testing.paxexam Regards, O. > Best Regards > Ian > > > I think they can > > run their tests just fine on the old dependencies and in case of a > > release of that module we don't need to wait for a release of > > testing.paxexam. > > > > I'm looking at > > > > - bundles/commons/contentdetection > > - bundles/commons/metrics > > - bundles/extensions/org.apache.sling.resource.presence > > - bundles/scripting/core > > - contrib/extensions/rewriter > > - contrib/extensions/sling > > - contrib/scripting/freemarker > > - contrib/scripting/org.apache.sling.scripting.thymeleaf > > > > Thanks, > > > > Robert
