On Friday 13 October 2017 14:17:03 Ian Boston wrote: > Hi, Hi Ian,
> On 13 October 2017 at 13:24, Oliver Lietz <apa...@oliverlietz.de> wrote: > > On Friday 13 October 2017 10:51:31 Ian Boston wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Hi, > > > > > I would like to upgrade Sling to depend on Oak 1.7.9 as it was just > > > released. The patch be the same as [1] with 1.7.8 replaced by 1.7.9. > > > > > > Any objections ? > > > > I prefer sticking to stable and wait for 1.8.0. > > Is that a strong preference ? yes, very strong. I hadn't the time to argue today, but Julian explained it well in the other thread (though I don't see how branching could help in general* as we are not able to cut releases anyway). > Not upgrading blocks the availability of OAK-6575 until 1.8.0 is released, > which creates delays in that feature being available downstream. [*] You can create private releases of course (which Adobe did in the past already, not recommended). Regards, O. > Best Regards > Ian > > > Regards, > > O. > > > > > Best Regards > > > Ian > > > > > > 1 https://github.com/apache/sling/compare/trunk...ieb: > > > upgradeToOak178?expand=1
