On Friday 13 October 2017 14:17:03 Ian Boston wrote:
> Hi,

Hi Ian,

> On 13 October 2017 at 13:24, Oliver Lietz <apa...@oliverlietz.de> wrote:
> > On Friday 13 October 2017 10:51:31 Ian Boston wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > > I would like to upgrade Sling to depend on Oak 1.7.9 as it was just
> > > released. The patch be the same as [1] with 1.7.8 replaced by 1.7.9.
> > > 
> > > Any objections ?
> > 
> > I prefer sticking to stable and wait for 1.8.0.
> 
> Is that a strong preference ?

yes, very strong. I hadn't the time to argue today, but Julian explained it 
well in the other thread (though I don't see how branching could help in 
general* as we are not able to cut releases anyway).

> Not upgrading blocks the availability of OAK-6575 until 1.8.0 is released,
> which creates delays in that feature being available downstream.

[*] You can create private releases of course (which Adobe did in the past 
already, not recommended).

Regards,
O.

> Best Regards
> Ian
> 
> > Regards,
> > O.
> > 
> > > Best Regards
> > > Ian
> > > 
> > > 1 https://github.com/apache/sling/compare/trunk...ieb:
> > > upgradeToOak178?expand=1

Reply via email to