Hi Konrad, On Tue, 2018-01-23 at 13:13 +0100, Konrad Windszus wrote: > But before spinning a new release I would like to get some more > opinions on the basename handling of the i18n bundle in general > (compare with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7421?focuse > dCommentId=16335677&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpan > els:comment-tabpanel#comment-16335677677 <https://issues.apache.org/j > ira/browse/SLING- > 7421?focusedCommentId=16335677&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system. > issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-16335677>). I think most of > the users might assume something else when it comes to requesting a > dictionary without a basename. Right now it is not possible to > explicitly request a value from a dictionary which is not having the > basename property set.
Without knowing too much about the i18n bundle, I woudl separate fixing the regression from properly defining the future behaviour. I would like to get Sling 10 out the door with the same behaviour as Sling 9, rather than wait even more to get better basename handling. After all, no one complained so far :-) Thanks, Robert
