Agreed, now with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7421 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7421> resolved and the IT added for this as well you could go ahead with spinning a new release to unblock Sling 10. We defer the baseline discussion to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7429 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7429>.
> On 23. Jan 2018, at 13:28, Robert Munteanu <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Konrad, > > On Tue, 2018-01-23 at 13:13 +0100, Konrad Windszus wrote: >> But before spinning a new release I would like to get some more >> opinions on the basename handling of the i18n bundle in general >> (compare with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7421?focuse >> dCommentId=16335677&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpan >> els:comment-tabpanel#comment-16335677677 <https://issues.apache.org/j >> ira/browse/SLING- >> 7421?focusedCommentId=16335677&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system. >> issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-16335677>). I think most of >> the users might assume something else when it comes to requesting a >> dictionary without a basename. Right now it is not possible to >> explicitly request a value from a dictionary which is not having the >> basename property set. > > Without knowing too much about the i18n bundle, I woudl separate fixing > the regression from properly defining the future behaviour. > > I would like to get Sling 10 out the door with the same behaviour as > Sling 9, rather than wait even more to get better basename handling. > After all, no one complained so far :-) > > Thanks, > > Robert
